—“With high trust we have beneficial social momentum (other people’s predictable actions), which is what energy is, a source of momentum we can use to our benefit.”—Steve Pender
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-17 14:37:00 UTC
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
This is the first time a post has been censored without notification. I don’t ev
This is the first time a post has been censored without notification. I don’t even know what it was. I suspect it might have been an image, and they purged all instances of an image? (which they do). but I have no way of knowing.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-17 08:24:00 UTC
-
“It has not been the devil’s policy to keep the masses of mankind in ignorance;
—“It has not been the devil’s policy to keep the masses of mankind in ignorance; but finding that they will read, he is doing all in his power to poison their books.”— John Kenneth Galbraith
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-17 01:22:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184640741416558597
-
“It has not been the devil’s policy to keep the masses of mankind in ignorance;
—“It has not been the devil’s policy to keep the masses of mankind in ignorance; but finding that they will read, he is doing all in his power to poison their books.”— John Kenneth Galbraith
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 21:22:00 UTC
-
Anyway. I’ll follow and see if I can learn anything. Thanks for the ping pong
Anyway. I’ll follow and see if I can learn anything.
Thanks for the ping pong.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 21:08:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184576772970561536
Reply addressees: @MattPirkowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184576665139253248
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@MattPirkowski Well, just testing the waters. There is an elegant structure to your thought worth investigating. I think I understand your personal ethics and we all justify that which we are most comfortable with. Choice of Law, Philosophy, and Theology mirror our Choice of Responsibility.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184576665139253248
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@MattPirkowski Well, just testing the waters. There is an elegant structure to your thought worth investigating. I think I understand your personal ethics and we all justify that which we are most comfortable with. Choice of Law, Philosophy, and Theology mirror our Choice of Responsibility.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184576665139253248
-
Well, just testing the waters. There is an elegant structure to your thought wor
Well, just testing the waters. There is an elegant structure to your thought worth investigating. I think I understand your personal ethics and we all justify that which we are most comfortable with. Choice of Law, Philosophy, and Theology mirror our Choice of Responsibility.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 21:07:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184576665139253248
Reply addressees: @MattPirkowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184574542733176832
IN REPLY TO:
@MattPirkowski
@curtdoolittle Yeah, after perusing some of your work I don’t think we’re going to see eye to eye on much.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184574542733176832
-
So when you say ‘adaptive’ independent of costs, that licenses Genghis Khan. I c
So when you say ‘adaptive’ independent of costs, that licenses Genghis Khan. I can’t determine whether you mean survival from stresses, competition within mutually beneficial limits, or adaptation to ordinary change.
IOW: is your claim of undecidability true?
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 21:03:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184575536221315072
Reply addressees: @MattPirkowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184575137074548741
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@MattPirkowski … but rarely if ever for a group. Just the opposite. At least, I can’t find any evidence of it in history. At some point reciprocity within limits of proportionality are necessary to prevent defection or limit one’s replacement (assassination).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184575137074548741
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@MattPirkowski … but rarely if ever for a group. Just the opposite. At least, I can’t find any evidence of it in history. At some point reciprocity within limits of proportionality are necessary to prevent defection or limit one’s replacement (assassination).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184575137074548741
-
(or incredible liars. Jury is in on the aristotelians(scientific). Jury is delib
(or incredible liars. Jury is in on the aristotelians(scientific). Jury is deliberating on the platonists (literary), and a conviction is likely. Why? pretty good evidence more harm than good.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 20:24:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184565768350064640
Reply addressees: @MattPirkowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181985737320697857
IN REPLY TO:
@MattPirkowski
Philosophers are perhaps most accurately conceptualized as linguistic terraformers.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181985737320697857
-
( M- feedback on fb via brandon hayes. first two paragraphs mix colloquial and t
( M- feedback on fb via brandon hayes. first two paragraphs mix colloquial and technical. last two are exceptional and quotable. good stuff.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 20:16:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184563664168390663
Reply addressees: @MattPirkowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184554849808945153
IN REPLY TO:
@MattPirkowski
This would also go some distance toward explaining why the most self-referential domains within academia, namely those social sciences concerned only with their hermetic language-games, would be far more vulnerable to pathological inflationary periods driven by positive feedback.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184554849808945153
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/72576587_485735188690043_86903298004
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/72576587_485735188690043_8690329800436350976_o_485735182023377.jpg (not sure who made this.)(not sure who made this.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 11:01:00 UTC