Because they have genetically, culturally, theologically, and argumentatively institutionalized the art of LYING just as I’ve illustrated. False promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophism, polymoralism, half truths, cherry picking) critique (undermining, straw manning, GSRRM).
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-11 15:46:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204789573768896513
THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF LYING
—“Because they have genetically, culturally, theologically, and argumentatively institutionalized the art of LYING just as I’ve illustrated. False promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophism, polymoralism, half truths, cherry picking) critique (undermining, straw manning, GSRRM).”—
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-11 12:11:00 UTC
Personally (not the natural law) I have come to understand that while I’m intuitively libertarian, the experiment with porn is that it’s a net negative, but that it is better to regulate a net negative than it is to turn it into a black market. I’d ban it in my neck of the woods.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-11 02:44:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204592641482072071
Reply addressees: @EnlightenedNPC @Nationalist7346
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204592037296820225
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@EnlightenedNPC @Nationalist7346 And beyond that it’s a Political question (“We just don’t want it here”), or an empirical question (“Accumulate evidence and inability to voluntarily or institutionally regulate means we have to ban it.”).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1204592037296820225
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@EnlightenedNPC @Nationalist7346 And beyond that it’s a Political question (“We just don’t want it here”), or an empirical question (“Accumulate evidence and inability to voluntarily or institutionally regulate means we have to ban it.”).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1204592037296820225
I never err. Ever.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-11 01:19:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204571286720131072
Reply addressees: @dormant511 @paulkrugman
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204570957769269248
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204570957769269248
Beautiful.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-10 23:51:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204549142049165313
Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204547898496765952
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204547898496765952
Think on what you just said and what’s going on with men in america.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-10 23:01:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204536613642153985
Reply addressees: @Zgames56026867 @DfeatPropaganda
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204508127497879552
IN REPLY TO:
@Zgames56026867
@curtdoolittle @DfeatPropaganda Isn’t Mao a bad example, though? His armies were mostly peasants with absolutely nothing to lose.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204508127497879552
good. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-10 19:54:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204489626079125513
Reply addressees: @MeisterDutch
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204481194479493126
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204481194479493126
He’s correct. My point is that it isn’t NECESSARY.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-10 18:48:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204473007579766784
Reply addressees: @MeansToReveal
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204471364717031426
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204471364717031426
(sorry if harsh. trying to lay this message down everywhere, and you gave me the opportunity) 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-10 17:49:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204458079284350976
Reply addressees: @DfeatPropaganda
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204457216092385282
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@DfeatPropaganda Some of us are capable of profound things, and achieve them. Others are not – because they cannot imagine doing them. Why? Because they cannot imagine getting a core of others to follow them. Why? Because they have no strategy, no plan, and lack the knowledge to do so. Study Mao.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1204457216092385282
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@DfeatPropaganda Some of us are capable of profound things, and achieve them. Others are not – because they cannot imagine doing them. Why? Because they cannot imagine getting a core of others to follow them. Why? Because they have no strategy, no plan, and lack the knowledge to do so. Study Mao.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1204457216092385282
It’s interesting when people make claims without evidence. How did Mao do it? Your Errors: Because you don’t understand you assume others don’t. Because you don’t know how to “Mao” assumes others don’t. Because you don’t know how to CAUSE the collapse, you assume others don’t.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-10 17:44:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204456853159198720
Reply addressees: @DfeatPropaganda
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204444717360066566
IN REPLY TO:
@DfeatPropaganda
@curtdoolittle I disagree
A necessary prerequisite to any hot civil war is an economic collapse.
As long as the average person can care for themselves and family, they have too much to lose to take up arms.
Now if we have an economic collapse in your timeframe, then anything’s possible.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204444717360066566