Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
@curtdoolittle Not sure what you’ve got to gain in arguing with someone so historically ignorant as to miss that extremely obvious point.
The destruction is coming, as it has come to all empires. Helps to have a ready supply of bricks once everyone’s got the bloodshed out of their system.
You seem to claim to have knowledge you don’t possess. Do you think everyone else is a timid basement dweller like you? And if I was going to organize this would be the very last place I would do it. There is no value in numbers or popularity. Mass movements are for leftists 😉
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/84339750_198464524885042_5102217394399477760_o_198464521551709.jpg “NAME CALLING DOOLITTLE NUMBER 9999999999….”
—“I don’t know how many things you’ve been accused of being, but here’s one you might find interesting.🤣”— A Friend
(re: doolittle)
….—“He’s a wannabe Nassim Taleb. He’s trying to re invent stoicism.”–Sabo Vojvodic
LOL…. That’s pretty much missing the ballpark.. by a few continents…
I did work on religion for a year, and did push for stoicism as one of the answers to mindfulness – until I understood it’s the stoic method of discipline but not it’s virtues.
So, it’s really just a matter of complexity. People don’t have a frame for Propertarianism other than ideology, philosophy.
If I sold red lollipops people would understand Red Lollipops.
If I sold something trivial like “The NAP”, people would understand Red-Lollipop NAP.
But I sell, a methodology producing a universally commensurable value natural vocabulary, grammar, and logic across all fields, a table of grammars explaining all paradigms of communication, an explanation of the means of undermining western civilization by the use of abrahamic method of deception – the polar opposite of aristotelian testimony – a method of falsifying testimony using that language to complete the scientific method, the formal logic of the psychological and social sciences, uniting hard and soft sciences, the strict construction of law, using that language and method, a constitution restoring the american constitution and the foundations of western civilization; and and explanation for the success of western civilization and the failure or stagnation or decline of other civilizations.
Ok. So. We’ve had a the socrates(criticis) plato(justificationism) aristotle (falsificaton) program; The paul-whomever-augustine program; the Bacon-Locke-smith-hume program to restore aristotle, the rousseau-Kantian-german idealist program (thru Heidegger) to undermine aristotle, and the marxist-postmodernist-feminist-denialist program to undermine the entire western tradition again. And in my view im’ completing the hilbert-brouwer/bridgman-maxwell-darwin-crick-menger-popper-kuhn-hayek program that was interrupted by the war, and the invasion of the west by the marxists and jews.
And for some reason it’s hard to imagine that P is on the same scale as Aristotle – When, it’s really just rewriting and completing Aristotle’s project in fully scientific prose. (Not that it was my intention. It’s just the outcome.)
So yeah. It’s waaaaaay too much for people to understand P if they don’t know the history of thought.”NAME CALLING DOOLITTLE NUMBER 9999999999….”
—“I don’t know how many things you’ve been accused of being, but here’s one you might find interesting.🤣”— A Friend
(re: doolittle)
….—“He’s a wannabe Nassim Taleb. He’s trying to re invent stoicism.”–Sabo Vojvodic
LOL…. That’s pretty much missing the ballpark.. by a few continents…
I did work on religion for a year, and did push for stoicism as one of the answers to mindfulness – until I understood it’s the stoic method of discipline but not it’s virtues.
So, it’s really just a matter of complexity. People don’t have a frame for Propertarianism other than ideology, philosophy.
If I sold red lollipops people would understand Red Lollipops.
If I sold something trivial like “The NAP”, people would understand Red-Lollipop NAP.
But I sell, a methodology producing a universally commensurable value natural vocabulary, grammar, and logic across all fields, a table of grammars explaining all paradigms of communication, an explanation of the means of undermining western civilization by the use of abrahamic method of deception – the polar opposite of aristotelian testimony – a method of falsifying testimony using that language to complete the scientific method, the formal logic of the psychological and social sciences, uniting hard and soft sciences, the strict construction of law, using that language and method, a constitution restoring the american constitution and the foundations of western civilization; and and explanation for the success of western civilization and the failure or stagnation or decline of other civilizations.
Ok. So. We’ve had a the socrates(criticis) plato(justificationism) aristotle (falsificaton) program; The paul-whomever-augustine program; the Bacon-Locke-smith-hume program to restore aristotle, the rousseau-Kantian-german idealist program (thru Heidegger) to undermine aristotle, and the marxist-postmodernist-feminist-denialist program to undermine the entire western tradition again. And in my view im’ completing the hilbert-brouwer/bridgman-maxwell-darwin-crick-menger-popper-kuhn-hayek program that was interrupted by the war, and the invasion of the west by the marxists and jews.
And for some reason it’s hard to imagine that P is on the same scale as Aristotle – When, it’s really just rewriting and completing Aristotle’s project in fully scientific prose. (Not that it was my intention. It’s just the outcome.)
So yeah. It’s waaaaaay too much for people to understand P if they don’t know the history of thought.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/83817627_198430574888437_6081974278717177856_n_198430571555104.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/84348392_198579378206890_8788443556604805120_n_198579371540224.jpg MOST REGRETTED MAJOR
(And those we shouldn’t have granted student loans for)
The reason to ‘waste time’ on idiots is that I copy these conversations and repost them, and it educates others on how to argue with idiots.
Some people are convinced that it’s possible to come to a compromise when that is not the left’s objective. It is to destroy the west.
—“I feel ya. I’ve said exactly the same in the past myself. On the very rare occasion I’ve managed to get someone to concede they were wrong, they were back to saying the same exact shit the next day. I can only hope the lurkers gain something from it all.”—
Yep. It’s all about (a) catching the interested, (b) educating the willing, (c) encouraging the involved, (d) making leaders of the convinced.
That’s what we do: our organizational funnel:
Advocates > John Mark > Me > Bill Joslin > The Team > the involved.
RT @JayMan471: Well if we wanted proof that they’ve gone off the rails for those who doubted it https://twitter.com/accidentalscene/status/1223856539615797248
The problem you face, is that I have used your little verbal spasm to (a) expose others to the ideas (b) plant seeds in your memory that you will have to wrestle with as time passes and the evidence accumulates. Doubling-down will prevent acceptance but it will do its work.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
—“Tolerance is a virtue, as such it has a golden mean; and too much tolerance quickly becomes a vice. If they call it anger, could they just be confusing rational intolerance with an emotional state?”—Andrew M Gilmour
