Same thing happens in the Dryer with socks. Heat is an accelerant apparently.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 19:30:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231300161814585350
Reply addressees: @AliceTeller @hbdchick @joannathemad89 @LadaMokusa @AAAllegedly
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231293308179222529
RT @NoahRevoy: Intergenerational trauma can stop with us if we dont repeat our parents mistakes.
If you are unsure how to develop a health…
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 18:28:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231284580801445888
AWESOME P-HUMOR 😉
by Stephen Wells
To be or not to be.
That is the question.
Whether tis nobler in the mind
to suffer the slings and arrows of Leftist false grammar
or take arms against a sea of operational struggles
and by opposing, end them?
Actor: Lawrence Olivier, Object grammar of P in Hamlet setting Subject: nerdy levity
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 11:03:00 UTC
RT @MartianHoplite: It’s REAL easy to argue that most of the historical evil we’re accused of is exaggerated or wholly made up; too easy; s…
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 00:19:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231010496389795840
–“We can quibble over colors, but nobody’s walking through walls claiming they don’t exist. Ha.”—Adam Jacob Robert Walker
(regarding qualia)
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 17:27:00 UTC
TESTIMONY – P IS SCIENTIFIC(LOGICAL, OPERATIONAL, EMPIRICAL) ARTICULATION OF OUR ANCIENT TRADITIONS.
by Scott Strong
What’s brilliant about you Curt is your ability to articulate it all so methodically. The reality is these Western ideas weren’t really formed by one great philosopher but are rather an an hod, kit-bashed collection of mostly intuitive practices that our ancestors accumulated, not out of some great philosophy or moral conviction, so much as pure pragmatism in that they were the best practices that simply *worked* and because if people did things that *didn’t* work, the group would die in battle, or starve in the lean winter months.
Propertarianism is not your invention, but rather your codification and articulation of the mostly intuitive unconscious pragmatic wisdom of our ancestors.
===
(That’s right. I just wrote it down for the first time the way others have written their bibles of primitive thought in primitive language. It may not have been possible to our body of advanced thought until we had an advanced language to write it in. But we’ve been practicing it for thousands of years. And that’s why propertarianism is a product of our European civilization, not me – i’m not that important and our ancestors are. And that is why it has more legitimacy than some other nonsense some philosopher pulled out of his had. I’m just a scientists discovering and capturing the rules of western civilization.
I’m just doing natural science in the natural law of our people – writing down the formulae.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 13:37:00 UTC
TESTIMONY: “MANY IDEAS ARE SCARY AT FIRST”
by Brandon Potts
I have to say when I first learned of you and saw your words they worried and angered me. Then I put my arrogance aside and I analyzed and researched what you had said.
While many of your ideas are scary to those that are set in their ways to those willing to learn and listen they are freeing.
Even my wife agrees with much of what you say.
Don’t ever stop my friend and one day you may be the king we need.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 13:29:00 UTC
MORE ACCURATELY DESCRIBED AS SPECTRA
by Luke Weinhagen
I view freedom, liberty and sovereignty in general as concepts more accurately described as spectra than as binaries – (https://www.facebook.com/luke.weinhagen/posts/10218951102141226) – as every individual has varying access to each of these within any of the limitless interactions we can exercise them, but I agree with the conclusion.
We all have limits. these limits make cooperation valuable. We exceed our individual limits for freedom and liberty through cooperation with others. In doing so we insure each other’s sovereignty. Where we fail to do so we are at the mercy of, are slaves to, the forces imposing those limits.Updated Feb 21, 2020, 1:03 PM
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 13:03:00 UTC
TESTIMONY (P AND CONTINGENCY)
by Robert Danis
What I like most about your writings for P is that your breaking it down into the smallest possible component. Most people try to take a something as a whole and you can’t – you have to break it down into components.
===IMPORTANT==
Continuous recursive disambiguation
Convert all speech to transactions stated in a series of subjectively (humanly) testable operations.
Meaning: first causes. 😉
And as first causes, there are no contingent premises.
And as non-contingent P is closed to deception by suggestion that is dependent upon ambiguity and contingency.
This is why P defeats set logic – which is forever contingent.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 11:59:00 UTC
TESTIMONY
by Robby Thorne
I had given up on saving Western Civilization until I found you. Because of you, I’ve gotten off the couch, away from the TV, and spend my days coordinating 2A events. Last night while I was at work, people from our small militia, basically strong armed a small town to go 2A. Still, I had a hand in it. This morning I’m in my car in the cold, waiting to see if I have motivated people in my community to get some exercise. So rather than cuss you for putting me to work, I think you for giving me something worthwhile to do, and giving me hope for the future. You might not see the fruits of your labor, but I’m starting to pick apples here in VA. You really are my hero Curt. Have a great day my friend.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 11:51:00 UTC