P Logic in Relationships https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/p-logic-in-relationships/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 20:21:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232400272988618752
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
Sure but what does that have to do with anything?
Sure but what does that have to do with anything?
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 19:56:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232394076412051456
Reply addressees: @Abhiman11678846
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232375355475972097
-
As for the hayekian view won’t argue with you there. too dense causality
As for the hayekian view won’t argue with you there. too dense causality
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 19:39:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232389639429861377
Reply addressees: @Abhiman11678846
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232389493220573186
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Abhiman11678846 This is not true.Caloric consumption in england in 1000ad was luxurious. And when the Crusaders went to the levant they had to teach people how to farm and plow.I know my ancestors and what they did and they lived just fine. Peasants less so. But no trade-city level wealth sure.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1232389493220573186
-
This is not true.Caloric consumption in england in 1000ad was luxurious. And whe
This is not true.Caloric consumption in england in 1000ad was luxurious. And when the Crusaders went to the levant they had to teach people how to farm and plow.I know my ancestors and what they did and they lived just fine. Peasants less so. But no trade-city level wealth sure.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 19:38:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232389493220573186
Reply addressees: @Abhiman11678846
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232381223751815169
-
Testimony (P and Contingency)
Testimony (P and Contingency) https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/testimony-p-and-contingency/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 19:29:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232387078958260226
-
Testimony (P and Contingency)
by Robert Danis [W]hat I like most about your writings for P is that your breaking it down into the smallest possible component. Most people try to take a something as a whole and you can’t – you have to break it down into components.
===IMPORTANT== 1. Continuous recursive disambiguation 2. Convert all speech to transactions stated in a series of subjectively (humanly) testable operations. Meaning: first causes. 😉 And as first causes, there are no contingent premises. And as non-contingent P is closed to deception by suggestion that is dependent upon ambiguity and contingency. This is why P defeats set logic – which is forever contingent.
-
Testimony (P and Contingency)
by Robert Danis [W]hat I like most about your writings for P is that your breaking it down into the smallest possible component. Most people try to take a something as a whole and you can’t – you have to break it down into components.
===IMPORTANT== 1. Continuous recursive disambiguation 2. Convert all speech to transactions stated in a series of subjectively (humanly) testable operations. Meaning: first causes. 😉 And as first causes, there are no contingent premises. And as non-contingent P is closed to deception by suggestion that is dependent upon ambiguity and contingency. This is why P defeats set logic – which is forever contingent.
-
Recent: Inalienability
Recent: Inalienability https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/recent-inalienability/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 19:27:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232386748002553858
-
More Accurately Described as Spectra
More Accurately Described as Spectra https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/more-accurately-described-as-spectra/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 19:26:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232386362311139329
-
More Accurately Described as Spectra
by Luke Weinhagen [I] view freedom, liberty and sovereignty in general as concepts more accurately described as spectra than as binaries – (https://www.facebook.com/luke.weinhagen/posts/10218951102141226) – as every individual has varying access to each of these within any of the limitless interactions we can exercise them, but I agree with the conclusion. We all have limits. These limits make cooperation valuable. We exceed our individual limits for freedom and liberty through cooperation with others. In doing so we insure each other’s sovereignty. Where we fail to do so we are at the mercy of, are slaves to, the forces imposing those limits.
re: Curt Doolittle February 21 at 11:29 AM You are sovereign in fact or you are not. You have liberty or freedom by permission. If you must ask permission you are a slave.