OMG I didn’t get that association. Thank you. No. Greg uses Janus (Ancient – past and future). The image I used was The Janus Face of Good and Evil (medieval). (sh-t)
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-24 21:26:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242563425282273282
Reply addressees: @PeterAl09732414
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242560874226860039
You pick. I don’t care. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-24 21:05:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242558272764289030
Reply addressees: @JFGariepy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242554962774765568
I have to get serious work done. I’m not willing to teach kindergarten to anyone no matter how intellectually honest. Sorry. And don’t try to shame me into it. It’s just a matter of cost.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-24 21:04:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242558007969538049
Reply addressees: @PaulKnowsBest2
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242557489217966082
Well, that isn’t quite logical. But yes it was intellectually insulting.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-24 21:02:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242557347328929792
Reply addressees: @PaulKnowsBest2
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242556898131562498
In the choice between my probability of error and your probability of not understanding which is more likely?
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-24 20:57:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242556215919628292
Reply addressees: @PaulKnowsBest2
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242554881208127488
So again you just didn’t understand what I’d written -which given the brevity is understandable.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-24 20:56:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242555971928559616
Reply addressees: @LLaddon @MrMatt444
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242555840487469062
yese but that’s what I worked on. Solving that problem. it’s fixable. but it’s not implementable without ‘effort’.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-24 20:56:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242555819180376064
Reply addressees: @PaulKnowsBest2
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242555394637156355
But while I bet you will ‘address’ them, but are you as afraid to debate me as Molyneux is?
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-24 20:51:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242554607173337088
Reply addressees: @JFGariepy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242550750795964422
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@JFGariepy That would be fine.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1242550750795964422
That would be fine.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-24 20:35:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242550750795964422
Reply addressees: @JFGariepy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242550578812764164
It it needs further clarification and you’re not too pissed then ask.
Net. Molyneux is an informed debater but he never matured into the analytic program nor from there to the scientific. Your talent is in using common sense. And to take down Molyneux’s argument is out of scope.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-24 20:33:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242550158136676363
Reply addressees: @JFGariepy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1242546232045772802