Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

MASTERING P-LAW

by James Krieger

It is a Masters level investment, & most of those who struggle do not even have an undergraduate comprehension of math, liberal arts & the sciences. Most of us who show promise have spent years studying political science & economics beforehand, or are accomplished in industry (Bill).

P is an interdisciplinary subject matter that requires extensive background knowledge in the history of thought, law, economics, game theory, neuroscience, sociobiology, anthropology, computational science & so on.

If you are struggling with basic concepts, I can tell you that you do not have what it takes to be a producer/contributor. The core of propertarianism is not difficult to grasp; we’d be able to teach it as third year course at top 20 undergraduate schools & most students would ‘get it.’ That most struggle speaks to the poor quality of education in America.

LEARNING P BY FOLLOWING POSTS

—“I’m a good example of someone who didn’t learn P, just kept following posts and after around 6 months I can follow posts pretty easily. A lot of the operational terms come up consistently and once you’ve looked up ‘demarcation’ a few times, and seen how it’s used you know what it means. Still haven’t won a King of the Hill yet though, I figure I’ll have to actually learn P to be able to do that.”— Grant Cameron McPhee

yeah, well, you just illustrated that you learned by playing king of the hill: observing the game until you’re ready to try to make the climb.

THERE IS NO BETTER WAY TO TEACH HUMANS THAN KING OF THE HILL GAMES – IT IS HOW WE EVOLVED TO LEARN.