Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

—“The view of some people against your character: Overly arrogant (narcissistic and gets very defensive when challenged); uses GRSM when speaking against it; talks about being aristocratic but is not noble (i.e 3 ex-wives, not fit, and likely not even capable of fighting a war) (hypocritical). Some people suggest your king of the hill tactics is just an excuse to use GRSM.”—

I can see that. Also, I’m intolerant, fickle, find the populi rather vulgar, am kind but not nice, ruthless, and probably not a very good person either. Of course, none of that is a criticism of my work. It’s a demand for christian equality and subsidy of their education, not aryan aristocracy and demand for demonstration of achievement in exchange for education. 😉 Different frames are inconceivable. Nietzsche was still a christian, a continental, and a german. Aristotle wasn’t. And Odin sure wasn’t. I’ve internalized it: Religion Appeals, Law Demands.

—“The view of some people against your character: Overly arrogant (narcissistic and gets very defensive when challenged); uses GRSM when speaking against it; talks about being aristocratic but is not noble (i.e 3 ex-wives, not fit, and likely not even capable of fighting a war) (hypocritical). Some people suggest your king of the hill tactics is just an excuse to use GRSM.”—

I can see that. Also, I’m intolerant, fickle, find the populi rather vulgar, am kind but not nice, ruthless, and probably not a very good person either. Of course, none of that is a criticism of my work. It’s a demand for christian equality and subsidy of their education, not aryan aristocracy and demand for demonstration of achievement in exchange for education. 😉 Different frames are inconceivable. Nietzsche was still a christian, a continental, and a german. Aristotle wasn’t. And Odin sure wasn’t. I’ve internalized it: Religion Appeals, Law Demands.