The Postmodern Program – Truth Doesn’t Matter, It’s All Just Reducible to Power https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/the-postmodern-program-truth-doesnt-matter-its-all-just-reducible-to-power/
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 16:41:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267496425270718466
THE POSTMODERN PROGRAM – TRUTH DOESN’T MATTER, IT’S ALL JUST REDUCIBLE TO POWER
—“Talked to a physical professor today, he said … It is *semantics* to say: that energy is not always heat, and that heat flow is irreversible, and that heat is produced as a difference in temperature and flows from hot to cold. …Yep…that happened. It usually happens over internet communication. First time to my face.”— Joseph E. Postma —“Proof that the sickness of postmodernism has also infected the hard sciences.”—Murray O’Brien —“You might as well go into a church and try to explain to the congregation that there is no god. But, the POINT is, those that matter, in the congregation, do not care if there is a god or not. They know the belief in a god is what they benefit from. So, they are the ones that have to destroy you, by any means. Otherwise they lose their control over, and resulting benefit from, the rest of the believing congregation. It is simply a matter of control, NOT science, or logic, or reason.”—Derek Alker –“Simply a matter of power.”— Joseph E. Postma
THE POSTMODERN PROGRAM – TRUTH DOESN’T MATTER, IT’S ALL JUST REDUCIBLE TO POWER
—“Talked to a physical professor today, he said … It is *semantics* to say: that energy is not always heat, and that heat flow is irreversible, and that heat is produced as a difference in temperature and flows from hot to cold. …Yep…that happened. It usually happens over internet communication. First time to my face.”— Joseph E. Postma —“Proof that the sickness of postmodernism has also infected the hard sciences.”—Murray O’Brien —“You might as well go into a church and try to explain to the congregation that there is no god. But, the POINT is, those that matter, in the congregation, do not care if there is a god or not. They know the belief in a god is what they benefit from. So, they are the ones that have to destroy you, by any means. Otherwise they lose their control over, and resulting benefit from, the rest of the believing congregation. It is simply a matter of control, NOT science, or logic, or reason.”—Derek Alker –“Simply a matter of power.”— Joseph E. Postma
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 16:39:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267495986504531980
Libertarians Made Great Useful Idiots https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/libertarians-made-great-useful-idiots/
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 16:02:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267486751255339008
Libertarians Made Great Useful Idiots https://t.co/rLEbHJQJyc
Oct 23, 2019, 2:57 PM LIBERTARIANS MADE GREAT USEFUL IDIOTS
—“Patent nonsense. Genetics is the most fundamental element of private property and inheritance.”—Jonathan Besler
Resource Free of Demonstrated interest. Desired Interest (not property) Demonstrated Interest (not property) Possession (non property) Consensual (reciprocally Insured proto Property Normatively Insured (social Property) Institutionally Insured (political Property) … Political Property: … … Private Property (monopoly of control) … … Private Common Property (unenumerated interest) … … Shareholder Property (enumerated interest) … … Franchised Common Property (unenumerated interest) One can demonstrate interest in children (create and maintain them) One can demonstrate possession of children by force, by convention, by institution) Property – meaning insured, possession, of demonstrated interest – on the other hand, is a consensual, normative, or political category because it is insured by others. If you possess it, and it’s not insured, it’s not property. That’s what property means: that which is insured by other parties. And good luck with rational operational and empirical evidence to the contrary. So you are confusing demonstrated interest with factional possession, and factual insurance, and factual terms of insurance. Which is why libertarianism succeeded the way marxism and abrahamic religion succeeded = by taking advantage of ignorance of people using conflationary terms, to create the presumption of logic where there is none. Libertarians shouldn’t feel too bad about being useful idiots for the enemy. But they were and are. But the authors of libertarianism come from a long tradition of deception by false promise, baiting into hazard, sophism, and critique, ad profiting from doing so. There is only one source of sovereignty and that is the reciprocal insurance of reciprocity by all men capable of bearing arms. Everything else is lying.
Oct 23, 2019, 2:57 PM LIBERTARIANS MADE GREAT USEFUL IDIOTS
—“Patent nonsense. Genetics is the most fundamental element of private property and inheritance.”—Jonathan Besler
Resource Free of Demonstrated interest. Desired Interest (not property) Demonstrated Interest (not property) Possession (non property) Consensual (reciprocally Insured proto Property Normatively Insured (social Property) Institutionally Insured (political Property) … Political Property: … … Private Property (monopoly of control) … … Private Common Property (unenumerated interest) … … Shareholder Property (enumerated interest) … … Franchised Common Property (unenumerated interest) One can demonstrate interest in children (create and maintain them) One can demonstrate possession of children by force, by convention, by institution) Property – meaning insured, possession, of demonstrated interest – on the other hand, is a consensual, normative, or political category because it is insured by others. If you possess it, and it’s not insured, it’s not property. That’s what property means: that which is insured by other parties. And good luck with rational operational and empirical evidence to the contrary. So you are confusing demonstrated interest with factional possession, and factual insurance, and factual terms of insurance. Which is why libertarianism succeeded the way marxism and abrahamic religion succeeded = by taking advantage of ignorance of people using conflationary terms, to create the presumption of logic where there is none. Libertarians shouldn’t feel too bad about being useful idiots for the enemy. But they were and are. But the authors of libertarianism come from a long tradition of deception by false promise, baiting into hazard, sophism, and critique, ad profiting from doing so. There is only one source of sovereignty and that is the reciprocal insurance of reciprocity by all men capable of bearing arms. Everything else is lying.
Why do you think I’m disagreeing with you?
That was my point.
No intent.
No malice.
Just a fking idiot prone to violence that never should have worn a badge.
That does not warrant allowing antifa to mix with protesters and foster violence and race hatred.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 15:53:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267484480127873028
Reply addressees: @KowboyCasanova @RjjenaPlayer1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267478883407998977