Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • The Making Of A Slave by Willie Lynch

    Sep 30, 2019, 1:53 PM

    Lisa Outhwaite: “Have you ever read The Making Of A Slave by Willie Lynch? It’s a reproduction of a speech supposedly given by Willie Lynch, slave-owner, around the early 1700s, in Virginia. It’s a guide on how to produce hard-working but docile slaves. Essentially he describes in detail on how to condition the female slave – it all works via the female. He would take a female slave, preferably one pregnant or with young children, and force her to watch the beating into submission of the most confident or masculine of the male slaves. The natural tendency in women to seek the most dominant protector and provider then suffers a crisis – she cannot rely on her own men for survival. This instinct for provision, that is at its most profound during pregnancy or when she has young children, is then transferred onto the slave owner. Despite his horrific abuses, he is seen as the dominant male and therefore the source of all security. The woman then is entirely submissive to him but, more importantly, she will raise all subsequent offspring to be obedient as that, to her mind at least, is the only way to secure their survival.  … The relentless ridiculing of Western men within our media works in a similar fashion. Western women have shifted loyalty over to the slave-owner – the state. She then raises her children to respect this new source of provision and protection.”

  • We Are Unique

    We Are Unique https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/we-are-unique/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 23:39:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267601816025432068

  • We Are Unique

    We Are Unique https://t.co/iuhpe6vn94

  • The National Socialism Question. It Won the 20 Th Right?

    The National Socialism Question. It Won the 20 Th Right? https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/the-national-socialism-question-it-won-the-20-th-right/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 23:38:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267601467457798145

  • The National Socialism Question. It Won the 20 Th Right?

    The National Socialism Question. It Won the 20 Th Right? https://t.co/7V3ZBbogjn

  • No You Don”t Understand Ukraine. (Really)

    No You Don”t Understand Ukraine. (Really) https://t.co/QDx3u3FaaV

  • The Right Loves the Feeling of Moral Righteousness as Much as The Left Loves Out

    The Right Loves the Feeling of Moral Righteousness as Much as The Left Loves Outrage https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/the-right-loves-the-feeling-of-moral-righteousness-as-much-as-the-left-loves-outrage/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 23:37:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267601074879430658

  • The Right Loves the Feeling of Moral Righteousness as Much as The Left Loves Out

    The Right Loves the Feeling of Moral Righteousness as Much as The Left Loves Outrage https://t.co/iF7aiZ0PGm

  • The Right Loves the Feeling of Moral Righteousness as Much as The Left Loves Outrage

    —“Any ‘new right’ must recognize ancient western liberal tradition of ‘noble individualism’ & liberal education, etc. to avoid throwing it out with the bathwater of ‘egalitarian individualism’, which diverted the liberal idea to modern hedonic socialist ends.”— @demontage2000

    Yes but those are not terms that can be institutionally enforced. Use instead: 1. Legal: Sovereignty and Reciprocity; Juridical Defense and Jury; Truth before face, Duty before self 2. Political: Markets before authority. 3. Aesthetic: Heroism, Excellence, Transcendence That the foundation. There is still more. The right loves the feeling of moral righteousness as much as the left loves outrage. But that is why conservative thinkers failed. We must like the founders, but better than they, create institutions and processes that provide shared incentives, not that require shared belief. The left invented desirable denial, sophism and pseudoscience. The postwar right doubled down on moralizing, b/c they were as afraid of admitting western civ is eugenic as the left was of eugenics. It invalidated democracy as national virtue narrative, in addition to the church. This inflection and the failure to continue eugenics will be seen in history like the failure of the greeks to bring about the industrial revolution. It is the basis for all problems of humanity in the post agrarian era. Vast numbers of people and cultures are detrimental to man.

  • The Right Loves the Feeling of Moral Righteousness as Much as The Left Loves Outrage

    —“Any ‘new right’ must recognize ancient western liberal tradition of ‘noble individualism’ & liberal education, etc. to avoid throwing it out with the bathwater of ‘egalitarian individualism’, which diverted the liberal idea to modern hedonic socialist ends.”— @demontage2000

    Yes but those are not terms that can be institutionally enforced. Use instead: 1. Legal: Sovereignty and Reciprocity; Juridical Defense and Jury; Truth before face, Duty before self 2. Political: Markets before authority. 3. Aesthetic: Heroism, Excellence, Transcendence That the foundation. There is still more. The right loves the feeling of moral righteousness as much as the left loves outrage. But that is why conservative thinkers failed. We must like the founders, but better than they, create institutions and processes that provide shared incentives, not that require shared belief. The left invented desirable denial, sophism and pseudoscience. The postwar right doubled down on moralizing, b/c they were as afraid of admitting western civ is eugenic as the left was of eugenics. It invalidated democracy as national virtue narrative, in addition to the church. This inflection and the failure to continue eugenics will be seen in history like the failure of the greeks to bring about the industrial revolution. It is the basis for all problems of humanity in the post agrarian era. Vast numbers of people and cultures are detrimental to man.