Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

—“You have some great concepts. I have been working through your philosophy and most of the time I am nodding in agreement but I do have a few questions I need answered.”—

That’s my job. Let’s do it.

to start off with the primary innovation of P-Law is truthfulness. So you can’t make an untruthful “legislation”, or one of false promise, or one of baiting into a hazard. And its a crime even to propose one. And the court must ascend (not veto) any legislation that violates the constitution. As such, you can do what you want as long as (a) you’re truthful and transparent about it (b) it doesn’t export harms outside your community. (c) you pay the costs of your folly.

–“First off- how do you take into account that MANY people are liberal as youth and grow conservatives? (I know I did) Are people allowed to move into areas( or out) as their political values change?”—

Crows fly to urban centers to mate and to the suburbs to raise young. So do humans, and for the same reasons. 😉 The Free Cities can have ‘licentious laws’ in order to accommodate the wants of licentious people. But they may not bring licentious people or laws out of free cities. The degree of self-expression in urban areas as hyperconsumption, and the constraint on self-expression and consumption as conservation in favor of reproduction, can’t be violated. So unless some communities do what they do, you can’t spread blue outside of blue. But there is no reason that people can’t move. And my understanding is that they can’t vote on anything other than taxes related to them for 10-12 years after moving to a non-free city in order to protect against it.

—“Also- even though i want to support something other than our broken system- I will never put myself in a position where I have no vote as a woman. Neither will any of the conservative blacks and browns I know ( And there are more than you think) I’m not trying to nay say- but you are looking for high IQ intellectual people. Mine is 163 and I was in all the gifted programs and you ( as a movement) would be undermining the potential success of propertarianism should you try to tell people like me “Trust white men” to make all the decisions. You would be better off the simply abolish the democratic and republican parties and re-establish Conservative parties that are governed by the more concisely spelled out constitution. THAT alone should prevent the mess we have now from happening again.”—

The mistake in our past was a monopoly parliament (or house) rather than the tradition of adding houses for classes as they began to obtain and make use of capital (get the franchise).

So we have corrected that by adding houses for the genders. This creates a condition where both men and women must agree for something to pass. This limits both sexes.

My presumption is that staets would do the same for races if the races diverged in interest as they do today – because the size of the underclasses in some races prohibits their survival in an advanced technological society. My suspicion is that given how easy it is to set up new states, that people would migrate to an area with commons of their preference rather than create conflicting houses of government. I also am fairly sure there are communities of all races that prefer to make small segregated communities. all of this is possible. it’s pretty libertarian in that sense.

—“But if you also control the school curriculum and hold parents accountable for being “Parents” and prevent the liberal hivemind currently in the educational institutions- you have the problem solved without sounding so antiquated and ( hate to say it Chauvinistic) “—

We have taken (brutally detailed) action against that. Again, the minute you have to tell the truth that’s consistent with physical natural and evolutionary law it gets very hard to say anything ‘liberal’ because ‘liberal’ is predicated on the false promise of the nature of man, uniformity of man, the malleability of man, the consequences of eliminating selection pressure, and endless growth freeing us from physical laws of scarcity. that is a lot of lies to keep alive when all of them are false and as such claims illegal.

—“To get your party off the ground, much less before the 2020 election, you will HAVE to have the conservative media on your side. You need the Tucker Carlesons, Hannities and Laura Ingrams or the world to get the word out. You need to have millions of supporters not tens of thousands.”—

Two points.

1 – I built a top 25 Digital Agency. And I understand the complex value proposition and how it’s sold: slowly. Some things are advertized (simple), some marketed (simply), some explained (less so) and some sold (complicated). Our strategy is to provide people who sell with the information and incentives and to use the rather extraordinary benefits of our economic proposals to market to those who might pay the cost being sold.

2 – We don’t and no one else does either, believe the question is resolvable by elections anyway. it’s over demographically the people who mass immigrated third worlders, and used women in the workforce, taxes, advertising hyperconsumption, and debt to fund it, in order to suppress our people’s reproduction. The number of people required regardless of voting is terribly small and there are plenty. So the purpose of messaging is to sell the benefits and reduce resistance. The state, financial, media, and academic sectors get burned to shreds by our amendments to the constitution. they wont care what we vote for. It’s not an election question. Elections are over. And you can’t know the data and have any other opinion.

-“And right now- you have a branding problem. I am as conservative as you can possibly get and ( I never thought I would say this) but when “Mark” Said women and blacks wouldn’t get a vote- I almost wrote you off as quacks.”—

I don’t know the context but john and I try different messages with different markets. But that’s not the case. it’s that you can create any polity you can organize, because other than necessary route or way (highway, rail, air transport), local laws take precedence. So I suspect he meant if you wanted to produce a community like that you could.

—“Your whole platform sort of writes women( And minorities) off as weak and ignorant.”—

We paint women, ‘betas’, and minorities as victims of the false promises of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, by the left, just as Christians were fooled by the same false promises in the ancient world by the same category of people who always profit from the selling of false promise in order to undermine civilizations. Just is what it is. The problem is it’s just SCIENCE. On the female (empathic) to male (analytic) spectrum, we have little agency over whether we treat empathy-experience or action-consequences with priority. For this reason women out of empathic pre-rational incentives, and minorites out of an inability to compete under the burden of market civilizaton that is and always has been an evolutionary meat grinder – and the reason for our success as a people.

The question is: can we teach people morality, law, and economics when the truth is painful? Well, we teach them lies and we get conflict. Shouldn’t we teach them truth and provide one another comfort instead?

—“( or it seems to) I’m as fed up with progressive Karens and BLM as anyone. Wouldn’t making the constitution clearer, shutting the loopholes, and the other measures control things?”—

We are plugging them, expanding them for false promise, but most of what we are doing is reforming the economy, state, and military for this and next century.

—-“The “no immigration unless they integrate into our culture” is also great. But you will not win anyone other than white men to your cause unless you can stop sounding like a dictatorship. Just asking. Like I said- Mark said people only “Nay Say” But these things are genuinely preventing me from being able to support you. SO help me, and those like me out. Allow us to get behind you.”—

I would need an example. John and I, at his advice, chose a strategy of appealing to those who would fight, because we didn’t think the present migration of normal people under the Overton window would happen. When we saw it happening we pivoted more mainstream and we still are doing so. the constitution is pretty awesome. it’s just painfully true.

—“I also need to point out that the balance between empathy and strength needs to be “Balanced” WHen you slant the balance away from that side you end up with a caveman society.”—

The way you solve that is with empirical evidence. And then houses of government between the different biases in thought.

—“We screwed up when we allowed the left to control the arts like the media, film, music, and art. We allowed them to get us used to the ideas of the extreme right and we didn’t even know it. That need to be fixed”—

They always do. The difference is whether they are seeking to mediate the fact that the laws of nature and natures’ god: the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws are a tragedy we must suffer, and find heroism, love, and compassion in our continuance anyway. Or whether a false promise that those laws can be circumvented and more so, the false blaming of Europeans for adhering to those laws and transcending man, when it is nature and nature’s god that made those laws.

What the left did is punish white men for the rimes of nature and nature’s god. Bt it is white men and white men alone who discovered, adapted to, and applied those laws, and in doing so dragged mankind kicking and screaming against his will out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, early death, and victimization by a nature all but hostile to human life.

Nothing like the irony of calling man a supremacist by blaming him for following the law of nature and nature’s god. 😉

Petulant children.