Thats nonsense.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-30 12:12:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829492289301102949
Reply addressees: @SidneyG41629545 @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1828912216806174870
Thats nonsense.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-30 12:12:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829492289301102949
Reply addressees: @SidneyG41629545 @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1828912216806174870
I still can’t believe anyone would say that other than as indirect criticism as a proxy for your anti-racism.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-30 11:59:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829489026115817645
Reply addressees: @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829277500570312714
RT @JoshuaLisec: “Let’s be clear,” = Here comes BS
“Actually,” = Here comes BS
“To be honest,” = Here comes BS
“Like literally,” = Hereโฆ
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-30 10:53:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829472538688192865
Sure. It’s a great topic for Q&A. ;). (and it’s not that complicated) ๐
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-29 21:03:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829263540374609947
Reply addressees: @partymember55
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829243083025998024
Interesting question. Or is it that I address the issue more? We’d have to ask Martin.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-29 21:02:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829263270169268595
Reply addressees: @partymember55 @AutistocratMS @Asuka_On_Drugs @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829259726326304894
I was answering the question more broadly.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-29 17:13:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829205665317040512
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @Asuka_On_Drugs @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829204824099008601
RT @curtdoolittle: @AutistocratMS @Asuka_On_Drugs @whatifalthist Martin and I have a very small number of disagreements and they are usuallโฆ
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-29 17:06:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829204027860725837
They’re horrible people.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-29 12:16:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829131126893347221
Reply addressees: @SteveSailorMan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829127623978405977
Love you Daniel. lol ๐
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-29 12:16:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829131054529052975
Reply addressees: @DRolandAnderson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829127408483750174
(“woke sequence” not “work sequence”. I make enough typos on my own. I don’t need help from ‘autocorrect’. ๐ )
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-29 12:00:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829127007466045768
Reply addressees: @SteveSailorMan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829126259999166909
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
–“5% of women on X behave this way. I believe Curt is wrong. I think itโs a sign of an immature woman not all women.”– Stephen Smith (@SteveSailorMan)
Yes, it’s a sign of immature women in particular, and Women on x behaving this way demonstrate high neuroticism – what we’d expect.
However, all women, under pressure, will at least demonstrate some fraction of this behavior, as will a minority of cognitively feminine men. Almost all women demonstrate the naxalt-axalt fallacy. And a supermajority demonstrate the inversion of true-false with desirable-undesirable.
But this argument requires context: Please remember that I am trying to explain the origins and ‘logic’ of the feminine > abrahamic > marxist-sequence of seditions that constitute the feminine means of antisocial behavior, underming, sedition, and treason.
So my ’emphasis’ serves the purpose of attempting to sensitize the audience of followers, their friends, and associates such that they learn to both identify it, and most importantly, realize it is an instinctual response that can be given voice as a pretense of argument using the feminine > abrahamic > marxist sequence – yet that we can suppress that antisociality and criminality just as we have that of violence with the law. The problem is male antisociality is obvious, but female antisociality is seditious and incremental, which we can see from the evolution of the feminist movement on one hand, and the evolution of the cultural marxist to race marxist to work sequence on the other.
Affections
CD
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1829126259999166909