Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

THE STRATEGY

by Daniel Roland Anderson

Curt hoped to galvanize enough unified opposition to constitute a threat that the Establishment would negotiate with.

John Mark was part of the strategy.

The reaction to the event shows that this strategy cannot succeed because no leader on the Right can set a strategy without risking arbitrary cancellation by a small section of the larger market available to the Right.

The reaction to the event demonstrates that no movement from the dissident Right can succeed without including the same market segment that prevents the movement from succeeding at achieving Curt’s goal:

Put together a big enough threat WITH a moral license sufficient to get a seat at the table.

If we could have gotten that seat, I believe we could have dictated terms. We could have been that powerful, that fast.

For me, avoiding a wide, destructive war was worth the risk of Curt being called a cuck.

(I don’t bear enough of that cost to make that call.)

But it didn’t work. The market has spoken. The movement cannot come from the dissident Right.

My question for Curt is whether there is time to galvanize a movement powerful enough to present demands with the requisite moral license before we reach critical mass during the election cycle.

My answer will come from watching Curt. If there’s a way forward, he’ll find it. But if he stays too quiet for too long, I’d get your mags loaded.

—

FACTS AS I UNDERSTAND THEM

GIVEN

1. I am a strategist, and a visionary, not a frontman “leader”. I have said this since the beginning. I make an aristotle, merlin, or wizard Oz just fine. But I’m an old, short, unfit, unhealthy super nerd, and an arrogant and effete one – and that’s not a frontman. … But the current acceleration forced my hand.

2. John might have made one. He had the talent for it, but the risk to a man of quality with family is too high given the fickleness of the right.

AND WHEREAS

3. The right wants a leader – an uncle Adolph for some and a Jesus for others.

4. The right cannot develop a leader. The internet boys will crab bucket anyone who tries. In this sense the internet “keeps the right down and lifts the left up.”

5. The kind of rhetoric from an uncle Adolph or Jesus that satisfies the right will have ideas his or her crushed by the left.

6. An uncle Adolph will be personally crushed by the left -that is their specialty: personalize and destroy.

7. It’s possible a key public figure already extant could shift into position of leader.

8. A key public figure already extant will not take a dissident right position, only a mainstream right position.

9. The dissident right is a political liability to a mainstream right position and rhetoric.

10. The dissident right will have no choice but to follow that person if he or she can emerge, so they can be mobilized as grunts. but they can’t be made a political entity in and of themselves.

11. In the absence of that person (or persons), the right will try protests or marches but continue to be crushed by the more nimble and aggressive left. And the media and state will continue to treat the right as a legitimate threat with illegitimate grievances.

12. The right will try spontaneous strikes again. If we are lucky we can encourage this to be against infrastructure of cities not shooting sprees. The state and media will continue to treat the right as a legitimate threat with illegitimate grievances, and the entire world will turn against the right.

13. The right will either be defeated or resort to opportunistic house to house warfare, which will look like ethnic rather than anti-left purge of ideology.

14. If the democrats are in control then it will be an all out state warfare against whites.

THEREFORE

15. My option is to complete my work, pivot mainstream and seek to provide a mainstream solution for an existing conservative to use as a platform to jump into national leadership.

16. That will result in a civic nationalist position at the cost of ethnocentrism. and an ethnic homeland is off the table.

17. Americans cannot take the cause to europe.

AND THEREFORE

18. The only choice for ethnocentrists is the worst kind of civil war: every last one of the enemy.

19. I don’t think I need to talk more about that.

KINDA SAD.

My plan would have worked. But no way to get there from here.

We soldier onward. 😉