A costly but relatively simple fix is available. 😉
Reply addressees: @bullfrogboxer
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
A costly but relatively simple fix is available. 😉
-
Anglo Empirical Uninspirational vs Continental Romantic Inactionable
Anglo Empirical Uninspirational vs Continental Romantic Inactionable https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/08/01/anglo-empirical-uninspirational-vs-continental-romantic-inactionable/
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-01 01:32:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1289373305988841474
-
Anglo Empirical Uninspirational vs Continental Romantic Inactionable
Anglo Empirical Uninspirational vs Continental Romantic Inactionable https://t.co/yO7uvy9G5N
-
Anglo Empirical Uninspirational vs Continental Romantic Inactionable
ANGLO EMPIRICAL UNINSPIRATIONAL VS CONTINENTAL ROMANTIC INACTIONABLE
1) Because conservatism is a romantic and anti-intellectual disposition, we see the Continental Right produces romantic political literature, and the Anglo Right produces empirical political literature. The Romantic isn’t actionable, and the Empirical isn’t inspirational.
2) So throughout our history, we have had the martial aristocracy, the legal nobility, and the church nobility, and the right cannot function without Martial to lead, Legal to administer, and Church to parent. The European people are entirely composed of followers – and neutered.
3) As I slowly catch up to Nietzsche on this subject the horror of it is suffocating. Our civ is wealthy because we have the only high trust, self-supporting, middle, working, and laboring classes. But they’ve been made followers of the aristocracy because of it – and useless.
4) So he’s right. The only Europeans that ever existed were the aristocracy.
And we, in our vanity, thought we could replace them.
-
Anglo Empirical Uninspirational vs Continental Romantic Inactionable
ANGLO EMPIRICAL UNINSPIRATIONAL VS CONTINENTAL ROMANTIC INACTIONABLE
1) Because conservatism is a romantic and anti-intellectual disposition, we see the Continental Right produces romantic political literature, and the Anglo Right produces empirical political literature. The Romantic isn’t actionable, and the Empirical isn’t inspirational.
2) So throughout our history, we have had the martial aristocracy, the legal nobility, and the church nobility, and the right cannot function without Martial to lead, Legal to administer, and Church to parent. The European people are entirely composed of followers – and neutered.
3) As I slowly catch up to Nietzsche on this subject the horror of it is suffocating. Our civ is wealthy because we have the only high trust, self-supporting, middle, working, and laboring classes. But they’ve been made followers of the aristocracy because of it – and useless.
4) So he’s right. The only Europeans that ever existed were the aristocracy.
And we, in our vanity, thought we could replace them.
-
The Choice Episode 12 Popularity vs Necessity – The Problem of Conservative Anti
The Choice Episode 12 Popularity vs Necessity – The Problem of Conservative Anti-Intellectualism
https://youtu.be/5g9RuiGRSvQ
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-01 01:29:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1289372612846424064
-
The Choice Episode 12 Popularity vs Necessity – The Problem of Conservative Anti
The Choice Episode 12 Popularity vs Necessity – The Problem of Conservative Anti-Intellectualism
https://t.co/9pA4QpCV6k -
The Choice Episode 12 Popularity vs Necessity – The Problem of Conservative Anti
The Choice Episode 12 Popularity vs Necessity – The Problem of Conservative Anti-Intellectualism
https://t.co/9pA4QplkeM via @YouTube -
2020-08-01
https://t.co/sLVudCmtsK
Reply addressees: @janonthemtn @erinviene -
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-01 01:05:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1289366513720295424
Reply addressees: @janonthemtn @erinviene
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1289361751457370119