
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-14 12:37:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1294251679861415937
Reply addressees: @andruwne @realDonaldTrump
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1294245407246225411


Source date (UTC): 2020-08-14 12:37:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1294251679861415937
Reply addressees: @andruwne @realDonaldTrump
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1294245407246225411
Happy to show if you want.
Reply addressees: @jamesfoxhiggins @realgalaxyjesus
Happy to show if you want.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-13 22:55:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1294044815647281152
Reply addressees: @jamesfoxhiggins @realgalaxyjesus
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1294044565138100224
Yes.
Reply addressees: @Gatberg1 @bierlingm @RoamResearch
Yes.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-12 13:42:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1293543497614663686
Reply addressees: @Gatberg1 @bierlingm @RoamResearch
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1293270103044304899
Yes we’ll tell that to Tibetans Mongolians Uighurs Vietnamese Europeans … lol.
Reply addressees: @RealityRelate
Yes we’ll tell that to Tibetans Mongolians Uighurs Vietnamese Europeans … lol.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-10 21:55:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292942781925732353
Reply addressees: @RealityRelate
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292921276554772484
Sure. Not sure if you’re a follower. If not, thought for you:
Justificationism(phil) vs Falsificationism(sci) vs Adversarialism(law): Logically Constructible(Internally Consistent) and Externally Correspondent(Observable) and Survives in the Market for Application(Existential).
Reply addressees: @Mowiztheflow
Sure. Not sure if you’re a follower. If not, thought for you:
Justificationism(phil) vs Falsificationism(sci) vs Adversarialism(law): Logically Constructible(Internally Consistent) and Externally Correspondent(Observable) and Survives in the Market for Application(Existential).
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-10 18:41:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292893740835704832
Reply addressees: @Mowiztheflow
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292882719807082496
(I’ve blocked the other party. But, in P-Law, ‘science’ is a testable definition, requiring testifiability(rare), completeness(rare), test of malincentives(!!!), warranty (very rare), and liability(only extant commercially). Some physics, econ, all climate, social, psych, fails.)
Reply addressees: @Derek86342645 @galt_the