Define reproductive preference as I have defined it 😉 and see if your claim holds. (Don’t worry, it doesn’t, because your definition is a single property while mine is the necessary economics of an interaction of an organism with its environment. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 18:59:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321889307435683842
Reply addressees: @PotsPol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321888670622863361
No you presumed a definition without asking mine. I presumed you were at least somewhat familiar with my work in the suppression of the kind of lying you’re engaging in. 😉 The difference is I educated you in my definition and you sought to claim I was using your definition. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 18:57:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321888892958711810
Reply addressees: @PotsPol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321887740108148736
Here is what you are doing: “Have you stopped beating your wife yet?” Well, I haven’t ever beaten my wife. So is xyz the only criteria as you define it or as I define it? I define it as a spectrum in the economy of reproductive preference and you are using verbalism of sophists.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 18:17:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321878947358015488
Reply addressees: @PotsPol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321877915844419585
Then you are wrong in the first, because you are just unsophisticated – likely because you were never educated in computation, cognitive science, or economics.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 18:12:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321877577263419393
Reply addressees: @PotsPol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321876830299791361
Again a dishonest question baiting into a false dichotomy. Under deceit. The taxonomic record, as all evolutionary history, reflects a cycle of variation and specialization including by isolation and hybridization within a hybridization window, else specialization or replacement. https://twitter.com/PotsPol/status/1321856524575277056
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 17:03:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321860220784676864
There is no reproductive opportunity to exercise . Do you realize how illogical that statement is. Lol
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 16:48:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321856468044435461
Reply addressees: @PotsPol @RonNoble7 @ThruTheHayes @WorMartiN @Nationalist7346
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321854953338687489
And no. My specialty doesn’t matter other than that you are demonstrating techniques of deceit. They can be used to mask insecurity via negativa or deception via positiva. You aren’t signaling insecurity as much as deceit. So that is all I notice. Anyway, go ahead.Others benefit.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 16:44:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321855468671848451
Reply addressees: @PotsPol @RonNoble7 @ThruTheHayes @WorMartiN @Nationalist7346
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321852607888084993
It’s in the absence of stress
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 16:31:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321852213610905601
Reply addressees: @PotsPol @RonNoble7
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321850511662993411
Presumes individuals ergo no.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 16:31:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321852111915782147
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN @PotsPol @RonNoble7 @ThruTheHayes @Nationalist7346
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321850270448570371
Andrew yang trying to say something marginally intelligent. https://twitter.com/AndrewYang/status/1321484856698802190
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 16:24:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321850354036805633