So what are the chances that Gab will become the Christian equivalent of FB/Twitter? I’m a Jeffersonian Christian (Jesus was a philosopher, Churchianity was as evil a capture of his ideas as marxism-postmodernism-feminist-pc/woke-anti-whiteness is a capture of European science today. And the Jefferson bible the only living representation of Jesus’s solution to the hard problem of tolerating continuous adaptation to the laws of nature: love). And 90% of the hate I get is from Christians with a room temperature IQ. We were booted from FB by a conspiracy of the Nazis – not the left. Our movement was undermined by mouth breathing Christians – not the left. I’m constantly attacked by Christians – not the left. This is why the right fails Anti-intellectualism, Non-cooperation, false merit, pride and virtue. Nazis, Ethnonationalists, Traditionalists, Civic Nationalists, Libertarians, Christians, Anarchists “I gotta have it my way even if we all lose because of it” The political philosophy of spoiled privileged children. . . . . (bait)
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
No the Jews Always Had Choices – They Chose
—“It’s not an accident that Jews in Europe excelled at financial endeavors and professions: it was all they were allowed to do, so characterizing it as “parasitism” is unfair. Every human economic activity can be characterized as “parasitic.”— @KCDefenseLawyer
You haven’t stated why it’s all they were allowed to do (record of conspiracy against the population), or why they were able to do it (non-payment for ore responsibility for defense, institutions, commons, territory), or why they were allowed to do it (the nobility lacked bankers until the Templars), or what the rate of interest was (300%+), or why they charged that rate of interest (baiting into seizure), or what they did if it couldn’t be paid (seizure). The Jewish group evolutionary strategy is ‘avoiding the cost of territory, commons, rule, and defense, by creating a state within a state, by undermining by baiting into hazard while escaping warranty and liability and maintaining plausible deniability’. This is the group strategy of human females. This is why I am concerned that reforming our laws to prevent this method of fraud made possible by our first right of self-determination isn’t enough – because it’s a genetic strategy and they manifest feminine cognition, verbal ability, speech, method of argument, workload. We don’t think of it this way but females are more aggressive than males. Jews and Arabs are more aggressive than Europeans. This has something to do with sensitivity to status signals (lower neoteny) and is likely related to the Jewish and Arab and all south Eurasian tendency to lie by face before truth even when unnecessary and to treat deceit as cunning and prideful. As for claiming people are generally parasitic, that’s false. All cooperation under reciprocity is non-parasitic – and it’s disproportionately productive. There is no other action that is more beneficial than cooperation. Adaptive cooperation is the most beneficial which i why we can afford these expensive brains. The purpose of the common natural law is to incrementally suppress parasitism. There is a unique vulnerability in western civilization because we use adversarial meritocratic markets in every aspect of life, under the principle of self-determination by sovereignty. This means we do not defend the population against scams like other peoples do. As in all things the west is an engine of natural selection but only if it continues to suppress methods of irreciprocity no matter how complex.
-
No the Jews Always Had Choices – They Chose
—“It’s not an accident that Jews in Europe excelled at financial endeavors and professions: it was all they were allowed to do, so characterizing it as “parasitism” is unfair. Every human economic activity can be characterized as “parasitic.”— @KCDefenseLawyer
You haven’t stated why it’s all they were allowed to do (record of conspiracy against the population), or why they were able to do it (non-payment for ore responsibility for defense, institutions, commons, territory), or why they were allowed to do it (the nobility lacked bankers until the Templars), or what the rate of interest was (300%+), or why they charged that rate of interest (baiting into seizure), or what they did if it couldn’t be paid (seizure). The Jewish group evolutionary strategy is ‘avoiding the cost of territory, commons, rule, and defense, by creating a state within a state, by undermining by baiting into hazard while escaping warranty and liability and maintaining plausible deniability’. This is the group strategy of human females. This is why I am concerned that reforming our laws to prevent this method of fraud made possible by our first right of self-determination isn’t enough – because it’s a genetic strategy and they manifest feminine cognition, verbal ability, speech, method of argument, workload. We don’t think of it this way but females are more aggressive than males. Jews and Arabs are more aggressive than Europeans. This has something to do with sensitivity to status signals (lower neoteny) and is likely related to the Jewish and Arab and all south Eurasian tendency to lie by face before truth even when unnecessary and to treat deceit as cunning and prideful. As for claiming people are generally parasitic, that’s false. All cooperation under reciprocity is non-parasitic – and it’s disproportionately productive. There is no other action that is more beneficial than cooperation. Adaptive cooperation is the most beneficial which i why we can afford these expensive brains. The purpose of the common natural law is to incrementally suppress parasitism. There is a unique vulnerability in western civilization because we use adversarial meritocratic markets in every aspect of life, under the principle of self-determination by sovereignty. This means we do not defend the population against scams like other peoples do. As in all things the west is an engine of natural selection but only if it continues to suppress methods of irreciprocity no matter how complex.
-
You don’t have a point. 😉
You don’t have a point. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 16:20:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355551550442237956
Reply addressees: @nicholaspiccari @drvolts
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355551455785218053
-
An opinion not in evidence
An opinion not in evidence.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 16:16:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355550544232919044
Reply addressees: @Herman15614714 @strongstate
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355545695156121603
-
You are stating an opinion. I’m prosecuting an argument. 😉
You are stating an opinion. I’m prosecuting an argument. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 16:15:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355550192662175744
Reply addressees: @nicholaspiccari @drvolts
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355548260153380867
-
(It’s the science). So you have to ask yourself why you’re lying and denying,eva
(It’s the science). So you have to ask yourself why you’re lying and denying,evading and ad hom, disapproval instead of argument. The reason is, as I stated because you’re demonstrating cognitively female traits – not education, information, cognitive, and testimonial discipline.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 15:34:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355539961328635908
Reply addressees: @nicholaspiccari @drvolts
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355538132305924102
-
I pretty much never err. It’s my job not to. I do make one mistake on a regular
I pretty much never err. It’s my job not to. I do make one mistake on a regular basis – I overestimate the common man, and in particular, I underestimate the degree to which a third of the male sex was born with female personality and cognitive traits. (“Men without chests”)
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 15:20:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355536362502582273
-
I pretty much never err. It’s my job not to. I do make one mistake on a regular
I pretty much never err. It’s my job not to. I do make one mistake on a regular basis – I overestimate the common man, and in particular, I underestimate the degree to which a third of the male sex was born with female personality and cognitive traits. (“Men without chests”)
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 15:19:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355536039201411072
Reply addressees: @nicholaspiccari @drvolts
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355533894427275267
-
@Rhodok That’s a great philosophy if you have time on your side
@Rhodok That’s a great philosophy if you have time on your side
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 12:18:37 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105644629495582080