No it didn’t provide a summary. We have demonstrated repeatedly that you aren’t capable of making that assessment. Keith admitted to now understanding. You are using evasion and denial of the universal evidence of the history of the common law. LIE AND DENY.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-13 04:42:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360449354067156995
Reply addressees: @torinmccabe @BlurmpfG @PROPERTARYAN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360448741266911232
You lie by every means possible. Either give me a case with which to test your argument that I can’t test recirprocity and testifiabilty or dont’. If you don’t then you’re just evading making your case.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-13 04:31:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360446568210563074
Reply addressees: @torinmccabe @PROPERTARYAN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360446212034363393
it’s over his head. this is a waste of time. I was hoping to maybe learn something but it’s just another idiot in the pile of idiots. There are very few people worth talking with and all these morons do is ruin the public discourse with their pretense of knoweldge.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-13 04:26:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360445315111870471
Reply addressees: @BlurmpfG @torinmccabe @PROPERTARYAN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360444280976859136
Nope. And like you’ve just demonstrated, you aren’t competent to make that assessment. You can’t even grasp the basics of law, the history of it or how it functions.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-13 04:25:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360445017043709958
Reply addressees: @torinmccabe @BlurmpfG @PROPERTARYAN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360444518856871942
Exactly. You make claims with no evidence. I’m begging you to try. Just one example.
You can’t do it because you know I’m right.
And this is definitely above your pay grade.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-13 04:25:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360444850005561344
Reply addressees: @torinmccabe @BlurmpfG @PROPERTARYAN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360444298244816896
That’s simply false. The JUDGING IS THE OUTCOME.
Where are you coming up with this? You’re just pulling this nonsense out of the air.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-13 04:23:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360444421913931777
Reply addressees: @torinmccabe @PROPERTARYAN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360444173166477312
He misrepresented everything, If there is any truth in there is a fragment of it in order to construct a falsehood. That’s how lies by sophistry are cosntructed. So I guess I have to spend six months gutting you idiots in public too.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-13 04:22:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360444278351269893
Reply addressees: @torinmccabe @BlurmpfG @PROPERTARYAN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360443592385458180
You can repeat it all you want but you just demonstrated (a) you aren’t competent to make the judgement, and (b) he just demonstrated that he’s not competent to make that judgement (c) and he had to appeal to sophistry to try to.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-13 04:21:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360444009139822593
Reply addressees: @torinmccabe @BlurmpfG @PROPERTARYAN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360443592385458180
So, you’re over your head because anyone with training in the sciences, or law would be able to engage in this conversation. But I know what philosophical sophistry is constructed from just as I know what Abrahamic deceit is constructed from. And you’re using those fallacies.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-13 04:15:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360442324275388418
Reply addressees: @torinmccabe @PROPERTARYAN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360441961107308544
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@torinmccabe @PROPERTARYAN I said: I have reduced law to first principles so that it can be stated in formal logic that can test the testifiability and reciprocity of any and all human claims. This is true. I know this is true.
You will not engage in testing this logic with examples.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1360441961107308544
(I can’t tell if he’s just defending his malinvestment at this point, or if he’s confused, or doesn’t comprehend what’s going on. )
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-13 04:11:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360441340182622209
Reply addressees: @BlurmpfG @torinmccabe @PROPERTARYAN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360441079686959104