Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • I don’t understand the question (remember how many questions i field per hour on

    I don’t understand the question (remember how many questions i field per hour on these different platforms. I can’t always understand the context.)


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-10 19:38:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1369734450993639426

    Reply addressees: @JarvisWitts

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1369728454527098880

  • NBC “DEBRIS” Sci Fi Show Feedback Absolutely love it. Thrilled. Terrified that l

    NBC “DEBRIS” Sci Fi Show Feedback

    Absolutely love it. Thrilled. Terrified that like most ‘tv for smart folk’ this will meet an early demise.

    I can see where they are taking the metanarrative of Debris and its analysis of mankind and it’s relatively novel and brilliant. But there is a difference between a script, the reveal-mystery plot, the various arcs, the characters that walk us through it … and the directing (which is ok, other than careless cardboard cutout treatment of extras), the production (good enough), the casting (below), and the acting (adequate) – although the clone-actor in the second episode is fabulous. And the promotion. Which was non-existent. I only found out about it because Russian tech nerds were talking about streaming it. Right now Russia is producing much better Sci-Fi than the west. Why? Sci Fi is naturally heroic. The western ‘commentariat’ has gone full anti-heroic, fulfilling the postmodern threat of destroying culture from within. But enough of that:

    Usual failures that I see in Debris:

    1) Casting working-class actors for upper-middle-class roles. Compare with x-files or firefly casting of the leads. This is partly a side effect of the steady ‘lower classing’ of the television industry seeking to resonate with the wrong audience while alienating all.

    2) Overplaying personal drama. These characters aren’t that interesting. This plot device keeps production costs down, tries to develop characters external to the plot instead of in concert with the plot. Compare with Law and Order. This is not an x-files/Law-and-order context, not an Expanse or Dark Matter context.

    3) The female lead is talented but not for this role. The male lead has proven himself in the industry and he can pull off the acting easily. But the director (or the script) is overplaying the american ordinary guy archetype vs brit that makes him AND the female lead competitive with the suspension of disbelief. Besides, anyone with experience with British culture knows that brit working class are even worse(trashier), not better than the American working class. While the actors work well together they don’t ‘sell’ the brit/us conflict.

    That said (given that I was trained as an art critic) the concept will fly. My suspicion is production is so far ahead, that the mistakes I’m seeing might burn out the audience before the second season can be greenlit and the writing, costume (et all),


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-10 19:37:14 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105867184311635168

  • RT @crbaptiste: Ep. 1 – Grief Ep. 2 – Love I’m paying attention #Debris

    RT @crbaptiste: Ep. 1 – Grief
    Ep. 2 – Love
    I’m paying attention #Debris


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-10 19:04:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1369725819581591561

  • Yep

    Yep


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-10 19:04:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1369725808009478148

    Reply addressees: @crbaptiste

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1369134873978503168

  • TESTIMONY

    -“P-law has the effect of being so intellectually inaccessible and dense initially that it discourages a person from trying; then when you learn it, it mysteriously is perceived as almost too simple to believe. Yet, it’s still understood as complex. … That’s been my experience.”- TruthQuest

  • TESTIMONY

    -“P-law has the effect of being so intellectually inaccessible and dense initially that it discourages a person from trying; then when you learn it, it mysteriously is perceived as almost too simple to believe. Yet, it’s still understood as complex. … That’s been my experience.”- TruthQuest

  • Stephen Williams’ Explanation of Nietzsche

    Most concise, accurate explanation of Nietzsche. (I completely agree). My view is that Nietzche diagnosed the illness failed to discover the cure. We have. But then P-Law & Homo Deus force us to face the mirror. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZN99fV7JuIk

  • Stephen Williams’ Explanation of Nietzsche

    Most concise, accurate explanation of Nietzsche. (I completely agree). My view is that Nietzche diagnosed the illness failed to discover the cure. We have. But then P-Law & Homo Deus force us to face the mirror. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZN99fV7JuIk

  • Don’t be an ass

    Don’t be an ass.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-10 15:41:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1369674735823556610

    Reply addressees: @Matt_Bo4 @SethApex @njdigregorio

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1369670688638984194

  • What an EXCELLENT analogy. Exactly. Well done

    What an EXCELLENT analogy.
    Exactly.
    Well done.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-09 20:59:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1369392537182605313

    Reply addressees: @NewRightAmerica

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1369309207015612420