Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

Nate,
Thank you.
But you know, we live in a world created by ‘scribblers’ like Aristotle, Aquinas, Locke, Smith, Hume, The Founders, Kant, Darwin, Menger, Nietzsche, Popper, and Hayek. Everything we think and speak is organized by those people and many others. I have some aware ness that what I am doing is in the same category of revolutionary thought that will affect mankind as have others before me.
But my work is non-trivial. It is quite a bit of effort. I can see the effect it has on people who learn it. And I have come to realize that the combination of my work and AI’s may solve one of the great problems of modernity -alienation.
But, as how to make it digestible for the masses, I have found that rather difficult. And to some degree I rely on Rudyard (@Whatifalthist) to distribute what is relevant for him and in his interest to make use of. And my work does filter through the conservative and libertarian spaces although slowly and without recognition.
I agree that once I’ve published at least the first volume that we can begin promoting my work. However, our strategy and my opinion, is that we must publish our work on the law, constitution, and policy reforms before the public can comprehend my work. There is no need for them to understand the depth of it. There is however need and value for them to understand ‘what went wrong’, the basic principles, the reforms we’re suggesting, and how we can make the world a better place for all of us – without repeating another sedition against our civilization by the feminine means of warfare.

Thank you for your support and care.
It matters to me.
Hugs

Reply addressees: @russianbot29462