I will debate both. Easily.
But I also know the audience easily understands:
(a) You evaded proposals for twenty different topics
(b) Those arguments falsify all of Rothbardian sophistries.
(c) You are seeking only to regurgitate a circular definition not conduct an argument.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 22:55:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411458715140694020
Reply addressees: @NSKinsella
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411457516500828164
@Xistance OMG!!!!!! it’s PERFECT!!!!
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 21:31:41 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106518800077787379
That’s a narrow topic we can debate.
Hmmm… you know what I think?
You don’t want to debate.
You want to recite.
You can’t debate.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 20:57:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411428810034143235
Reply addressees: @NSKinsella
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411428606417543175
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@NSKinsella Are you sure this is true? Your ethics only prohibit impositions of cost upon intersubjectively verifiable property, and that leaves open blackmail and every other kind of soft, hard, and conspiratorial fraud. Are you saying Non Aggression against IVP is superior to Reciprocity?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411428606417543175
You’re making circular arguments. you can either defend libertarianism against my criticisms or not. If you can’t then of course, you’re demonstraing I’m right.
You can deny and evade but I’ve made the accusations.
You can either answer them in a debate or not.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 20:41:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411424857670176769
Reply addressees: @NSKinsella
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411421547290677248
I challenge any Rothbardian, libertarian, ancap, from the Mises, Rothbard, Hoppe camps, including anyone at M.I. PFS, or Hoppe himself to debate me on these accusations. Together we solved Sociology in three generations but Anglo science replaced both Jewish and German Sophistry. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1411414292046528514
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 20:33:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411422953376563209
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1411414292046528514
English: Stigma (disgrace) not Stigmata (Jesus’ wounds.)
Or in Latin, Stigma (wound) and the plural Stigmata.
Great freudian slip.
Made me laugh. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 20:25:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411420753547829249
Reply addressees: @jwarrenprescott
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411419902724902915
Here are a set of options. Within that set of topics you can find something to debate. It covers the entire spectrum of my criticism of rothbardianism and less so hoppe’s use of germanic secular theological > kantian > hegelian > marxist rationalism.
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1411414292046528514
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 20:09:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411416778346057734
Reply addressees: @NSKinsella @NotGovernor
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411381910673240064
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1411414292046528514
RT @threadreaderapp: @curtdoolittle Guten Tag, here is your unroll: @NSKinsella (1 of 24): Stephan, don’t GSRRM (or lie) you simply… https:…
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 20:01:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414721522286604
unroll
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 20:00:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414655348658179
Reply addressees: @threadreaderapp
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414292046528514
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@NSKinsella
(1 of 24): Stephan, don’t GSRRM (or lie) you simply rejected the topics I proposed. (Any of the following topics are open to discussion, or any you suggest.)
OPTIONS:
(a) is a libertarian polity possible to bring into being and to survive competition?
… https://t.co/9R6r4ygy1l
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411414292046528514
19. Isn’t the use of kantian rationalism (the german attempt at creating a secular pseudoscientific alternative to occult religion) by Hoppe just a minor improvement on Rothbardian pilpul, critique, and false promise of freedom from competitive pressures and laws of nature?
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 19:59:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414346845114371
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414345666510850
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
18. Isn’t libertarianism a set of demands for privilege (escape from paying for the costs of the commons necessary to produce ‘order’ including the institution of property) using the female presumption of their intrinsic value rather than an irrelevant minority propulation?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411414345666510850