well done. yes.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-03 17:13:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1422606579250106369
Reply addressees: @Reciproperty
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1422606168669757444
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
@PeterZeihan Curious about your take on a counter-proposition
@PeterZeihan
Curious about your take on a counter-proposition: https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1422584790491049986
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-03 15:50:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1422585708565385218
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1422584790491049986
-
again you are confusing three issues, and my criticism is that you’re asking a t
again you are confusing three issues, and my criticism is that you’re asking a thought leader to get involved in political mudfight when that’s not his job. (It’s mine, not his)
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-03 01:54:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1422375232703193093
Reply addressees: @hoeberian @PeterZeihan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1422374669605347330
-
Like I said. I can’t contribute to this debate. I can only explain the incentive
Like I said. I can’t contribute to this debate. I can only explain the incentives, thought processes and biases of the actors. Even so it’s not worth my time. and for you to criticize a theorist’s work because he doesn’t advocate for your topic is intellectually dishonest.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-03 01:51:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1422374655638319104
Reply addressees: @hoeberian @PeterZeihan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1422373566545383425
-
Well, again, you’re making a decision based on a set of presumptions, and while
Well, again, you’re making a decision based on a set of presumptions, and while the research scientists I know agree, I think you’re confusing conspiracy with the problems of collective decision and organization in democratic polities – they aren’t empirical. That’s the problem.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-03 01:45:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1422372973114187783
Reply addressees: @hoeberian @PeterZeihan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1422372175529533451
-
My point is the same. Between March and now his content is getting a refresh and
My point is the same. Between March and now his content is getting a refresh and it’s all solid.
As others note Peter avoids the big political question of the day in order to improve the big geostrategic and economic concerns of the day.
Division of labor. It works.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-03 01:26:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1422368339184308226
Reply addressees: @test1234875 @PeterZeihan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1422367277794594816
-
@Afterrthought Smart
@Afterrthought Smart
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-03 00:55:56 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106689472507478337
-
PETER ZEIHAN made good use of the past year, and he’s on a roll with new content
PETER ZEIHAN made good use of the past year, and he’s on a roll with new content, at a higher resolution than the past. This analysis of south of the border is flawless.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVrNWPltr6g
@PeterZeihan
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-03 00:40:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1422356695309762565
-
@Afterrthought @ramzpaul @Counter-Currents @kingofallnads @rooshv @VDARE @TheZBl
@Afterrthought@ramzpaul@Counter-Currents@kingofallnads@rooshv@VDARE@TheZBlog …. I want to get involved.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-03 00:27:36 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106689361132947088
-
@Sqpatrick @a Pretty much, yes. 😉
@Sqpatrick @a Pretty much, yes. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-03 00:27:05 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106689359103336002