Done
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-10 18:35:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866552327068586169
Reply addressees: @orion_pulse @tunguz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866535533813567781
Done
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-10 18:35:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866552327068586169
Reply addressees: @orion_pulse @tunguz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866535533813567781
RT @JakeFis64057669: @The_Kyle_Mann https://t.co/AGLArrsgqC

Source date (UTC): 2024-12-10 16:40:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866523515383583208
That’s a good thing.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-10 16:40:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866523424102945233
Reply addressees: @BigmamaDolcea @The_Kyle_Mann
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866287090549362833
That’s a good thing Kyle.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-10 16:39:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866523244377129291
Reply addressees: @The_Kyle_Mann
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866160459940057511
It’s always interesting when someone assumes I am unaware of something rather that I have more knowledge of the causal hierarchy of existence at all scales than they do.;)
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-09 22:34:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866250008280088835
Reply addressees: @ArionWise11 @TonyGause49
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866209871965593885
Yes. As I said in a followup comment, for some reason, despite being in both states recently, I confused minnesota and wisconsin. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-09 22:33:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866249740851249473
Reply addressees: @Nav_Vette @RetroCoast
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866242665483792754
An assertion that requires an argument and evidence.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-09 19:27:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866203157472350444
Reply addressees: @ArionWise11 @TonyGause49
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866203022705000643
RT @nutherjoe: @curtdoolittle https://twitter.com/nutherjoe/status/1029125928301907968
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-09 18:26:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866187559719883129
(that’s the short version, yes.) lol
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-09 18:09:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866183369832484971
Reply addressees: @TonyGause49 @ArionWise11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866181838575734941
Q: Curt: –“Speaking as a friend. Your usage of advanced technical vocabulary restricts what you write to people like me used to reading advanced philosophical books. You will never reach a wide audience that way.”–@ArionWise11
Of course. However, a couple of questions arise:
1) I have to produce work that can survive competition in legal forum over at least two centuries, and against the enemy who is equally sophisticated as I am despite the unsophistication of both populations we serve.
2) Who has power and who will always have power? Whether it be power to advance popular and national interests or collective international interests?
3) What audience do I speak to then? In my understanding I speak to those who will at sometime soon have power.
4) Are those you suggest I might reach capable of understanding what I’m communicating without adapting it to their (lesser) frames of reference (theology, fascism), or will they adapt to the frame of reference (greater) that I’m providing?
5) I’m quite happy if others communicate to their audiences on their terms what I suggest. And it happens consistently if slowly and without attestation.
I am quite aware of the minority of young men who are producing content that informs their bases. The question is whether those bases (y’all) have or will have any power – the answer appears to be no. Instead, those bases can only reduce impediment to those with power, amplify the power of those with power, and if necessary apply force in mass to enforce those with possibility of, possession of, and skills in weilding power.
This is the primary problem with the internet generations – they understand that they can have a voice, that they can counter the voices of propaganda, and that they can shift democratic opinion ‘somewhat’, and they can make a bit of money doing it. Weakening the power of the past generation of power structures.
But that is not power. It is only influence. Power requires the capacity to organize incentives to apply some means of coercion whether moral or immoral.
And the means by which power is engineered is the law.
Cheers
CD
Reply addressees: @ArionWise11
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-09 18:05:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866182468468129792
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866178135512727558