Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

@sakovkt There are no religious ‘awakenings’ only ‘reformations’ Communism is a reformation of Judaism, pomo-pc-woke-feminism is a reformation of Christianity. Islamism is a reformation of Islam using communist strategy and tactics. Buddhism is a reformation of Hinduism, and only the Japanese maintained the only ‘true’ and natural religion (ancestor worship).

Duggin is hard to judge, because he is vastly more sophisticated in his use of theology, philosophy, and science as means of rhetorical ideation – but I doubt he’s right. Religiosity declines faster and faster with every decade. So what’s occurring is we’re all seeking demand for another religious reformation.

The entirety of Christianity failed to reform in response to darwin. We’ve had no Augustine 400s or Aquinas 1200s in the 1800’s and so the church was replaced by the academy, and the academy converted to marxism-neo-marxism-feminism-pomo-woke.

In retrospect, we can see that the Catholics almost got it right, but that the church as a FORMAL institution was unable to reform because of its economic and careerist incentives, just as our current government and academy cannot reform because of their careerist incentives.

The combination of the english invesntino of the modern state, the european natural law in scientific terms and christian love as a via positiva requirement is simply identical to the science of of human cooperation, economics, and evolution.

But it seems we either get sophomoric humanism, or supernatural christianity, and we can’t compete the european project of the unification of Athens for the masculine and Jerusalem for the feminine.