Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

Aren’t you supposed to be the naive, benevolent psychologist with optimistic anticipations of the potential of mankind? lolz. -hugs

How long did it take darwin? Longer than I. 😉
You can keep trying. But you can’t defeat my arguments. Sorry. You’re just an infantilized girl railing in the wind. All sound and fury signifying nothing.

If you can’t understand what I wrote it’s because you are too ignorant of the subject matter, even the libertarian subject matter, to hold an opinion, and even less to criticize what you cannot grasp.

So no I don’t take you seriously because you have not said anything serious.

The non aggression principle uses deception by suggestion allowing the reader to substitute anything he or she wishes as the target of opposition. This is why there is no ‘advanced’ libertarian thought, and nothing but introductions. It’s adolescent thought. If you want to study adult thinking then study the history of the common law. That’s for grownups.

Not sure why you consider that post anything to do with Greenland. You’re misreading the context?

And yes I am a philosopher, social scientist, and serial entrepreneur with multiple $100M companies under my belt and a dozen smaller ones – plus a think tank.

Perhaps you should consider seeking to understand and not interpreting the words of others through whatever lens you’re obsessed with. So far you’re engaging in ridicule because you are doing so without grasping the context.

Seeking to understand means asking questions, not making assumptions.

Correct.

Correct.

@WerrellBradley

Looks like you were right (again). 😉

I understand. But as a safety strategy, at least at present, it makes at least some sense.

Well done. 😉