(BTW: I had no idea how successful you were, how broad your reach, how impactful … and how much men appreciate you for it.)
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 17:35:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456314253531623426
Reply addressees: @RationalMale
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456310738440663048
You did. I’m just recording the rather painful effort of trying to catch up to you. 😉
And damnit but it’s depressing as hell.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 17:33:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456313782255472642
Reply addressees: @RationalMale
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456310738440663048
1of2: There is a difference in reasoning between solving the problem from the bottom up: Rollo/Red Pill, and solving the problem systemically from the top down (what I do). Hopefully between top-down and bottom-up we’ll put policy and skills in place and overcome this problem…
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 17:32:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456313434161795072
@EarthlingCarl artifact of copy-paste. (will fix)
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 17:25:14 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107219957493486620
@thattomguy ( There is a difference in reasoning between solving the problem from the bottom up: Rollo/Red Pill, and solving the problem systemically from the top down (what I do). Hopefully between top down and bottom up we will put policy in place and skills in place, to overcome this problem. Because as you can see with the success of the left, men can’t win the bottom up game. It’s not possible if the institutions rig the game in favor of women.)
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 17:24:35 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107219954918953694
hugs
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 17:04:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456306371629133825
Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456302288650317828
(OMG you are sooooo goood…)
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 16:42:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456300734530703364
Reply addressees: @ContraFabianist @EricLiford
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456300392644419591
THIS. https://twitter.com/ContraFabianist/status/1456297911449391104
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 16:32:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456298212046802952
https://twitter.com/ContraFabianist/status/1456297911449391104
So what I did is produce a common “branding problem”. The research necessary to produce the solutions branded me and the method as ideology, philosophy, or science, which is divisive and complicated, while the POLICY OUTPUT is relatively simple and widely desirable.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 16:22:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456295894152880128
Reply addressees: @EricLiford
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456295589721825282
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@EricLiford The problem producing P is that I used the public as research subjects, in search for first principles, which is a very technical methodology and resulting science and logic. Yet what people CARE ABOUT is policy changes. They emphasize politics as substitute for POLICY solutions.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1456295589721825282
RT @hoeberian: @curtdoolittle Your insight that street people are basically pilfering from the cultural commons is crucial. And by extensio…
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 16:10:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456292687938789381