Same difference, stated from the opposite direction.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 15:44:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456648744255033346
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN @toodarkmark
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456648614667816972
To borrow from the obvious: “Not an argument.” lol
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 15:44:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456648633550528513
Reply addressees: @Bohm_Baller @BobMurphyEcon @billyj41
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456646488646459399
😉 ok. I’m happy for you.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 15:31:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456645371397120012
Reply addressees: @thegreatduggo @Loveon999 @Redrum_of_Crows
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456645072456388611
Is there more context? I think I might see how he’d interpret that as race baiting.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 15:30:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456645061308035075
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN @toodarkmark
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456640441261207552
Understood.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 15:13:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456640862725754880
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN @toodarkmark
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456640769037684739
I did discuss the actual point. The actual point is that you’re making judgments in ignorance. There is nothing unusual about having direct connections with banks, or personal relationships with bankers. In fact, that’s ‘how it’s done’ among ‘grownups’. Meaning people who matter.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 15:12:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456640626955595777
Reply addressees: @thegreatduggo @Loveon999 @Redrum_of_Crows
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456640062272249860
James doesn’t want to get dragged into certain conversations, or even have them show up in his space.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 15:10:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456639996602032132
Reply addressees: @toodarkmark @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456639600139640838
Sorry kid. Whether or not a sentence makes sense so to speak is very often determined by the ignorance of the person interpreting it. You failed. Sorry.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 15:07:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456639308627066890
Reply addressees: @thegreatduggo @Loveon999 @Redrum_of_Crows
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456637394107650050
I’ll vote for you. lol. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 14:50:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456635121545715718
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456634108025659398
@Ulrik_Pedersen If y’all made a list of policies and laws so that we could all debate policies and laws, you’d have a case. The problem is you use NSDAP and NAZIs and National Socialism as buckets without making a bullet list of changes and refining it until it’s an actionable set of steps possible for institutions to implement. You odn’t need to make historical excuses for policies. Some of the NSDAP policies were shit and some of them were good. In particular the defense of the peole from the globalists was an important innovation, without going into communism, which destroyed the productivity of the private sector and private sector use of capital.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 14:50:18 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107225010565696368