Yep. (And thanks for noticing)
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-09 22:19:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1458197594350436357
Reply addressees: @hoeberian
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1458177999669452802
Yep. (And thanks for noticing)
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-09 22:19:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1458197594350436357
Reply addressees: @hoeberian
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1458177999669452802
@lestado (That’s what I was thinking.)
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-09 20:38:25 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107249028641981001
@Communism_Kills AR: Feel you. Sending sympathy.
(FWIW: When I started blogging in public, we had some initial negative feedback, but taking ‘the painful truth’ approach only served to increase my reputation for brutal honesthy and legitimacy with customers. So, it depends on who your ‘byline’ is selling to, and what they’re selling, and what they want from you. If your writing exists to maximize opportunities for general eyeballs that ‘s different from whether it exists to convey you’ll speak truth to power. So you get a lot of freedom with a small powerful audience, and no freedom at all with a large powerless audience. It’s frustrating. )
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-09 20:15:18 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107248937765686891
@Communism_Kills (Gets to me too. The trolls poison the well. The crab bucket of undermining works from within as well as from without.)
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-09 20:09:57 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107248916718126022
Eli is quiet but his insights are consistently rock solid in political economics. Luke again, is quiet but his insights are consistently in behavioral econ. Michael is deep in education and mathematics but says little.Brandon says very little. Martin and I do most of the talking.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-09 19:21:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1458152687992705028
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1458150011187965970
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
So you see how people who pick up P-Logic, Science, Law, end up applying it to their domains and contributing to the body of knowledge? And people outside don’t see the power of universal commensurability in identifying first causes and dimensions of any given subject.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1458150011187965970
that’s fking genius michael….
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-09 19:19:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1458152219304501251
Reply addressees: @MichaelSurrago
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1458151910922403850
RT @MichaelSurrago: @curtdoolittle Oh something else I got from you
The typical story matches the tempo of a successful animal hunt. So wh…
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-09 19:08:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1458149521238728704
@ConceptualJames RE: Recent videos and recent interviews with Michael Malice. Seriously, James, you’re brilliant. 😉 And your humility is endearing as hell. -cheers
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-09 18:58:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1458147082594828296
It’ll take me a while to get into your frame and see what you’re trying, but I’m sure it’s doable. Sometimes very hard problems take a while to percolate in the subconscious.And I can already imagine my emphasis on decidability and social scale,would require new axis in pedagogy.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-09 18:56:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1458146605794840582
Reply addressees: @MichaelSurrago
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1458145871846125575
I need to hug you. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-09 18:51:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1458145319800147972
Reply addressees: @MichaelSurrago
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1458144872708427777