Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

@Nature_and_Race Quibble: Don’t like to disagree with you – ever, but don’t like us to bait criticism by oversting the case – both derive from the french invention of socialism, and the functional difference is national and ethnoeugenic of superior peoples vs international and ethnodysgenic of inferior peoples. But the goal of both was an alternative to liberalism (what we call evils of capitalism) in both cases, and to provide an alternative to the horrors of communism’s destruction of identity by the national socialists preserving national identity. The practical difference was that NS succeeded, Communism failed, and that this is because NS produced private-public partnerships rather than destroying the public sector entirely.