I am in the states and safe. Thank you.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-24 15:22:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1496868108971118592
Reply addressees: @marsden_katana
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1496867050559528962
@Astinsan@genophilia The correct understanding is that ‘conservatives’ in general, and the alt right in specific, are not innovative, double down on past failures, are low information, over attribute competency, are defensive, reluctant to act, and reluctant to create or trust leaders who CAN act.
So all political groups have to innovate. The only question is WHAT they innovate.
Most of my work is an innovation – perhaps the only meaningful ‘conservative’ innovation since Darwin and the subsequent Eugenics movements. And it’s possible to innovate USING my work, precisely because I disambiguate what must remain, and what may change.
If you don’t know your group strategy (and no conservatives, alt right do – hell, no one does.). Then you can’t preserve it from internal undermining without authoritarianism that prevents innovation to stay ahead of competing innovators. So you lose either way without innovating.
So can we blame conservatives, libertarians, and the alt right for generations of repeated failure? Or do we blame ourselves for failing to produce elites that provided the knolwedge we need, in an innnovation that we need, in order to defeat the enemy … without defeating ourselves.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-24 15:07:45 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107853595654108572
@GTW66 Then whose job is it to fix the problem of their fear?
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-24 10:09:03 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107852421096838980
Are you just making that up? lol
yes.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-24 08:18:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1496761358431363073
Reply addressees: @chrishaley32
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1496758762153119747
@Java2107 They are simply as far above your head as your conversations with a five year old and for these same reason: you lack requisite minimum knowledge for adult conversation. And likely lack intellectual honesty.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-23 20:25:44 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107849183717046380
@Java2107 Of course not. Dumb people are not useful.
Like you.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-23 20:22:10 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107849169670800326
@Java2107 Dumb people very frequently cannot comprehend what I write or say. But again, the lion does not trouble himself with the opinons of sheep. Instead we search for and collect the few people of sufficient and ability to learn, and of sufficient character to speak truth before face regardless of cost, and we invest in those who can do the work. You can’t. We know that already. It’s OK. This is adult conversation. Back to the kiddie pool. Back to your kiddie stories.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-23 20:17:43 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107849152157526141
@Java2107 I wasn’t offended. I was merely stating the case, defending the informational commons from your use of the feminine, abrhamic means of deception by avoiding the underlying argument to causation.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-23 20:03:17 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107849095416128571
@Java2107 Inferiors are always offended by superiors. It’s a cost of superiority to bear their offense, just asi t is a cost of parenting that we bear the offense of our children.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-23 20:02:05 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107849090696497954
@RadioFreeNorthwest Well done.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-23 19:43:16 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107849016683867237