Yes. π
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-01 08:20:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520679475134050304
Reply addressees: @hivetyrant36 @JoshuaLisec
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520673146910789634
Yes. π
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-01 08:20:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520679475134050304
Reply addressees: @hivetyrant36 @JoshuaLisec
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520673146910789634
Right again. Putin. Cancer.
Source date (UTC): 2022-04-30 18:28:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520470117422931973
Now, it may take some time for you to disambiguate ‘using psychology’ from undermining by psychologizing as a means of deception, but that’s just practice.
Source date (UTC): 2022-04-30 16:22:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520438390893780993
Reply addressees: @TimBeckley3 @ContraFabianist @St_Rev
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520438038932905987
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@TimBeckley3 @ContraFabianist @St_Rev So all use of ‘psychological criticism’ attempts to ‘undermine’ vs argue. They are attempts to evade reciprocity.
Either you can describe behavior by rational incentives or you can’t. Either you understand or you don’t. Either you can identify a trade – or you conduct a crime.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1520438038932905987
RT @LukeWeinhagen: @bryanbrey @ThruTheHayes @curtdoolittle @StevePender @GoodDudesShow Conflict resolution in the form of competition produβ¦
Source date (UTC): 2022-04-30 16:15:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520436621124022274
DISAMBIGUATION
Psychologizing: the use of female means of undermining or the jewish means of undermining (critique) to construct ad hominem accusations of defect instead of the rational pursuit of incentives.
Source date (UTC): 2022-04-30 14:53:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520416052764626945
Reply addressees: @TimBeckley3 @ContraFabianist @St_Rev
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520415385949851654
Thank you.
See? This is why Twitter friends are awesome. lol π
Source date (UTC): 2022-04-30 14:18:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520407198911848448
Reply addressees: @andriisenyk
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520405509991538688
RT @pmarca: Narrative violation: “We find that polarization has increased the most among the demographic groups least likely to use the Intβ¦
Source date (UTC): 2022-04-30 02:20:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520226504990511110
I just did. You just didn’t comprehend it. As such you’ve removed yourself from demonstrated capacity to participate in the discourse. So please don’t waste my time.
Source date (UTC): 2022-04-30 01:29:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520213723847311365
Reply addressees: @StruanCurtis @HbdNrx @St_Rev
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520212493922152448
not an argument. It is in fact, deception. Either you can explain all human behavior by rational incentives, or you are avoiding doing so in order to pretend (lie) that the individual errs, deceives, or malfunctions.
Always. Sorry. Period.
Source date (UTC): 2022-04-30 01:23:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520212187444301825
Reply addressees: @StruanCurtis @HbdNrx @St_Rev
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520208812082409474
All psychologizing is deception.
Why are you using psychologizing?
Instead, what are the incentives of the people you’re criticizing?
Source date (UTC): 2022-04-30 00:14:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520194773734285313
Reply addressees: @StruanCurtis @HbdNrx @St_Rev
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520194186980597760