Dunno. Why not? 😉
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-23 17:06:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1528784517204430850
Reply addressees: @SaitouHajime00
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1528733742356779008
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
Of course. I’d love to
Of course. I’d love to.
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-23 11:58:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1528706963688792065
Reply addressees: @AdamNoEve666
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1528706764664975360
-
RT @curtdoolittle: @HeraldWeekly You’re wrong. Avoiding degeneracy by flirting p
RT @curtdoolittle: @HeraldWeekly You’re wrong. Avoiding degeneracy by flirting playfully, in pursuit of creating families, was carefully co…
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-23 11:14:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1528695847948636162
-
You make that claim with confidence but out of understandable ignorance. And Den
You make that claim with confidence but out of understandable ignorance. And Dennett is quite a bit behind. I can’t provide closure in tweets, but the deed is done. We have a constructive logic of falsification by decidability for all four sciences.
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-22 14:44:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1528386284095422465
Reply addressees: @AnarchoPerennis @Heliotrophy @culturaltutor
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1528382466431635463
-
(Thanks. Miss you man. 😉 Have a great day. )
(Thanks. Miss you man. 😉 Have a great day. )
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-22 14:26:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1528381802162925568
Reply addressees: @denischmel
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1528381592875552771
-
Because we’ve had to redefine it so many times in the past century
Because we’ve had to redefine it so many times in the past century…..
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-22 13:37:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1528369572167962624
Reply addressees: @_Akhaten
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1528368897317122048
-
RT @curtdoolittle: @Dartholomew @Heliotrophy @culturaltutor Judges and scientist
RT @curtdoolittle: @Dartholomew @Heliotrophy @culturaltutor Judges and scientists aren’t politicians, priests, professors, teachers, or mom…
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-22 13:23:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1528365940118798338
-
Again, you don’t know what you’re doing. You’re trying to state a false equivale
Again, you don’t know what you’re doing.
You’re trying to state a false equivalency.
And to do so to double down on your failure.
I’m not here to make you happy.
I just do what’s true.
And it’s often painful.
It certainly has been for me.
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-22 13:11:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1528363028718178305
Reply addressees: @Dartholomew @Heliotrophy @culturaltutor
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1528361365550911488
-
RT @curtdoolittle: @Dartholomew @Heliotrophy @culturaltutor So where you see ad
RT @curtdoolittle: @Dartholomew @Heliotrophy @culturaltutor So where you see ad hominem, I see a simple scientific statement of the truth,…
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-22 13:05:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1528361512565456896
-
RT @curtdoolittle: @Dartholomew @Heliotrophy @culturaltutor I understand your po
RT @curtdoolittle: @Dartholomew @Heliotrophy @culturaltutor I understand your position, but the only reason you hold that position is you t…
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-22 13:05:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1528361504256532480