Go back and test yourself by trying to understand the argument I was making.
We seek out people who are capable of making such connections. If you can that’s great. If not, that’s ok.
Source date (UTC): 2022-08-26 19:57:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563254207666601984
Reply addressees: @dhegdeer @horseshoegorg0n
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563251692673519616
You are missing out.
Source date (UTC): 2022-08-26 19:47:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563251810000769028
Reply addressees: @dhegdeer @horseshoegorg0n
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563251692673519616
What I’m doing is high level reasoning and you’re a few centuries behind. That’s Ok. You’re jumping into a multi-decade conversation without comprehending the context, and (falsely) assuming you grasp it.
Philosophical textualism vs scientific operationalism
Source date (UTC): 2022-08-26 19:44:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563251079902826496
Reply addressees: @dhegdeer @horseshoegorg0n
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563247765009747968
The latter. My germanic intuition interprets it as loading and framing instead of testimony. However, the way they use it (those I’m referring to) as rhetorical (accentuating) testimony, not loading and framing.
Source date (UTC): 2022-08-26 19:38:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563249513019887616
Reply addressees: @toodarkmark
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563248917181243392
IRONIC: Apparently you don’t understand that NAXALT/AXALT is used as a false objection to a statement of a general rule. I’m stating a general rule. Your objection isn’t logical. It’s a claim that I’m NOT relying on a general rule of arbitrary precision. When I am. ;).
Source date (UTC): 2022-08-26 19:33:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563248195412840449
Reply addressees: @dhegdeer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563247407499923457
Listen to boris johnson for an easy to find example. They speak like they’re acting on a stage: they’ve been taught rhetoric. We haven’t. They’re right. I’ll demonstrate in a video sometime soon.
Source date (UTC): 2022-08-26 17:59:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563224689811800068
Reply addressees: @aldafa_ir
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563224119767838720
nope. just the opposite.
Source date (UTC): 2022-08-26 16:40:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563204796177207301
Reply addressees: @UberFrood @TeaPainUSA
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1562935454093217803
This is one of our best videos. The first half hour in particular is a valuable analysis.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTdgrgj8WeQ
Source date (UTC): 2022-08-26 16:26:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563201335348330496
Trying not to engage in this conversation, but you made it public.
I ignore the alt-right as unsalvageable egoistic, overconfident, incompetent, frustrated, anti-intellectual children.
I took a risk to try to help. Overestimated them and failed.
They’re an irrelevant curiosity.
Source date (UTC): 2022-08-26 16:07:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1563196453576937475
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1562755771363774464
It’s a good thing your opinion is irrelevant then.
Source date (UTC): 2022-08-25 20:48:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1562904743453855744
Reply addressees: @Terrance_69 @MrSoNso21
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1562902655940395009