Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

@Afterrthought@ramzpaul@AndrewAnglin@AshaLogos@kingofallnads@occdissent

I didn’t understand this post at first, so I didn’t respond. After seeing it a second time I agree. Facts are facts: the success of the left at suppressing our means of organization online reflects the decline in our success at political action.

My understanding was, and is, that the only solution is ‘showing up with 2M men’ because the USG cannot field enough men who can (willingly) contain that number, and with that number we can demand reforms I’ve written.

I keep hoping that one of the conservative sites will succeed in creating a ‘separate’ digital discourse. Unfortunately between investor constraints, commercial constraints, political constraints, the reluctance of conservatives to fund such things, and the tendency of ‘the stupid, angry, lost boys’ to poison the discourse, the totalitarians to claim they have solutions (they don’t) the christians to claim they have solutions (they don’t) the libertarians to claim they have solutions (they don’t), and the tendency of these groups to infighting despite that they don’t have solutions, only an ‘adult’ – military or political, heroic, personality can unite the ‘tribes’. And the enemy is exceptional at crushing the emergence of such leaders.

So despite my efforts, and those of others, and those of millions of well meaning fools, I see a bloody civil war, house to house, neighbor against neighbor as a deterministic outcome.

The crashing economy and the death of the boomers might help bring it about, because the only thing holding the government together is ‘it isn’t bad enough yet.’