Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

(For followers, the irony of someone lecturing me on Popper… lol. Where are @RafeChampion and the rathouse crew when this happens? First, I don’t understand mathematics, second I don’t understand popperian thought. Next someone will tell me I don’t grok Hayek or Hoppe. lolz )

I can it’s just a bit harder and I have zero confidencde you will eitehr comprehend it (you haven’t comprehended anything at all so far) or just throw more ad hom and goal post movement at it. I mean, there are hours and hours of video on ‘the method’ on youtube. Its all public.

That’s not the same thing as saying that I copied her work,read it before, or took it seriously. It’s just that its in your work, and I can’t evaluate it from within your work.I treat it as heresay until I have read it. I don’t see the point though. Because it appears trivial.

I read your work. It’s not hard. It’s shallow. I iddn’t read ALL your work. I read the thesis and the first papers in the search results. They all make the same errors.

You haven’t stated the relationship between her work and mine. In casual survey I don’t see it. And I’ve stated the orgin of my thought and it’s well documented in the thousands of pages of notes I’ve archived over the past few decades online.

What’s your evidence?

Like I said, that’s gonna take a bit of work. Becuase what you do is trivial (and nonsense), and what I do is very complicated. 😉

Not my job to educate you.

That has nothing to do with the fact that I ddidn’t know of Gplligan, wouldnt take her seriuosly if I did, and that you claimed I relied on her work rather than those I stated (and I forgot Gary Stanley Becker.)

That said even ancient sumerian law was clear about women’s ethics.