Typical lie by false testimony. You were never a fan.
We have catalogued the techniques by which the left lies and we can create an AI that labels it as such.
Why? Accuse, promote, inflame, disproven, shift, new accusation, repeat, with no recognition or acceptance of failure.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-01 16:44:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587485806436012033
Reply addressees: @dariosings_
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587449318755090432
He was correctly criticizing hillary for narrative construction in her favor in the absence of the evidence, by showing that there was an equally believable alternative.
But for women and the left first order negative logic is somehow too great of an intellectual feat.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-01 16:42:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587485334023163905
Reply addressees: @ReneeAlida
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587460158258642947
Just checkin’. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-01 16:37:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587483924174970885
Reply addressees: @LukeWeinhagen
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587480661291581440
Please don’t waste my time.
I have enough problems with lunatics already
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-01 16:18:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587479088108904450
Reply addressees: @Johnnymax72
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587478329946431489
This is an insight luke. Connecting two different axes. Excellent work.
Although I just saw a whole new field of work to do… Why is it that you keep doing that? lol
(BTW: I think you mean ‘despite’ errors?)
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-01 16:16:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587478599212335104
Reply addressees: @LukeWeinhagen
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587475869232254976
Can you restate that?
–“heritability doesn’t show “how genetic” a trait is.”–
I infer that I agree with you but I’m not really sure what point you’re trying to make.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-01 15:58:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587474110757617668
Reply addressees: @DamienMorris @NSesardic
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587472980602413063
I responded to you because you made an idiosyncratic projection (iron law of feminine and left projection). You just asserted another idiosyncratic judgment that is contrary to all of the science of economics and politics. Why do you even vaguely assume merit in your opinion?
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-01 15:42:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587470157319995392
Reply addressees: @evanfeenstra @naval
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587469048484630528
Anna, you’re just emoting because you’re female, and neurotic, and lack comprehension of decidability, law, economics, politics and history. You might think pretense-of-equality is a good thing. But it’s a recipe for incompetency. Democracy is a luxury good made by monarchy+law.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-01 15:38:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587469225060335617
Reply addressees: @Anna19909269
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587468203487174657
This is why I include David Deutsch in my short list. He isn’t wrong, but he’s just restating what everyone else has said forever, with his own quantum spin. I can’t decide if he understands the quantum(background) as a classical or mathy object. I’d have to interview him. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1587463469925801986
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-01 15:20:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587464528291401729
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1587463469925801986
Correct.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-01 14:41:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587454874559602695
Reply addressees: @johnmarkneato @anuqore @naval
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587335759773794304