RT @daniellecsavoy: https://t.co/BhJf3Uhil3
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-10 01:24:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590515670843736065
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
I don’t recall but from a quick scan of his material I understand the issue beca
I don’t recall but from a quick scan of his material I understand the issue because I’ve lived it. I spent more resources trying to communicate with normies than I did in solving the ‘hard problems’ of philosophy and law.
He’s right of course.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-10 01:03:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590510543554871300
Reply addressees: @BoasRickie @wil_da_beast630
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590507883737026561
-
I just want to thank you for honest adult conversation. And I acknowledge the mo
I just want to thank you for honest adult conversation.
And I acknowledge the morality of your opinions.
It’s hard to discuss such matters otherwise 😉
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-09 19:43:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590429833640964096
Reply addressees: @ComradeChernov
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590423077703540736
-
As it should be. 😉
As it should be. 😉 https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1590384919829962752
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-09 19:30:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590426709933064195
-
Ok, so fine
Ok, so fine.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-09 19:14:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590422675851456513
Reply addressees: @ComradeChernov
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590422095284277248
-
You are engaging in the abrahamic method of deciet by trying to claim a monopoly
You are engaging in the abrahamic method of deciet by trying to claim a monopoly control over a unversal definition. In maxist theory he uses only two classes. However in the rest of the sciences we use many classes. Your definition is only a utility not a truth.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-09 19:13:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590422326784700418
Reply addressees: @ComradeChernov
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590421504076152833
-
RT @wil_da_beast630: I’d been looking for this data! There is very real, quantit
RT @wil_da_beast630: I’d been looking for this data!
There is very real, quantitative evidence for my “effect of AA AND legacy programs on…
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-09 19:01:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590419284445958144
-
(hugs) 😉
(hugs) 😉
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-09 18:33:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590412181736394752
Reply addressees: @Nefertiiti
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590411830421516289
-
But I think I understood your original position as ‘faith in human nature’, and
But I think I understood your original position as ‘faith in human nature’, and your ‘moral nature’ as equalitarian, as the cause of your preference for Leninism. And it’s kind of hard to argue against your incentives. They’re virtuous.
But I have to deal with the humans we have.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-09 18:32:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590411999791284224
Reply addressees: @ComradeChernov
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590408772975218690
-
So, again, compare my economic and strategic predictions to the vast majority of
So, again, compare my economic and strategic predictions to the vast majority of talking heads and see who has been more accurate for the past fifteen years or so. The question is WHY? Why is the information publicly available, but so many people predict so poorly when using it? https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1590380377968848899
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-09 16:29:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590381059874512896
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1590380377968848899