Well sure. But why express empathy for them when they’re demonstrably horrible people unfit for the duty and responsibility of any association whatsoever with not only the monarchy, but the government, and society as well?
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-10 16:25:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612848212460851202
Reply addressees: @kakakakaty2 @georealpolitik
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612846102566563844
I’m trying to science your responses. I see a pattern but can’t quite get my arms around it. You’re defending some sort of prior. And defending it for a reason. I can’t quite determine either yet. The more evidence I see, the more likely I’ll discover it. All behavior’s rational.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-10 15:53:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612840102350168067
Reply addressees: @yorukoglu_asli @shermanklumpp
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612831261164277763
You are correct on all counts. Yes.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-10 15:49:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612838949558394881
Reply addressees: @nianello6
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612837882858770434
I don’t know the answer and don’t jump on me because of it, because I don’t follow celebrity gossip, but visibly mature but under the age of consent, is not equal to pedophilia. It’s illegal. It’s bad judgment. It’s irresponsible. But it’s not pedophilia. Who’s a pedophile?
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-10 03:54:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612659189221924865
Reply addressees: @ThymeMatterof @NicoleNp021728
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612653954990481408
Well, the pattern is correct, but … not so much on the logic. 😉 lol https://twitter.com/NoahRevoy/status/1612545015930327040 https://t.co/4WClV1mlwC
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-10 03:20:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612650665469173760
If I watch this and it’s a waste of my time, you owe me. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-10 01:53:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612628643615735809
Reply addressees: @ScottClaremonty
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612626327668158464
I could probably play that concept game with you a bit but I’m not quite able to get my arms around what you’re intending. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-10 01:52:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612628488820822017
Reply addressees: @NewScribeOldInk
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612625781993218050
You: responsibility evading > argument evading > pretense of knowledge > pretense of argument by substitution of disapproval for falsification > fraud.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-10 01:30:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612622893287968769
Reply addressees: @foodologistgirl @Barbara72633997
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612586111263457281
And you’re a child pretending you can play games with the older kids. 😉 Which, I, like the older kids, find laughable.
BLOCKED
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-10 01:27:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612622000224190464
Reply addressees: @George_178
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612621504667353088
‘authentic’ is a. ‘new true scottsman’ fallacy. I can’t quite intuit what you mean but I assume it’s a combination of ‘healthy’, ‘successful’ and ’empirically obviously superior given the long history and tradition of what works.’
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-10 01:25:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612621643435614210
Reply addressees: @NewScribeOldInk
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612588728249376769