I know you’re having fun ’cause I remember you as periodically inserting a bit of wit.
So I’ll go along and say … “pretty much. yeah.”
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-11 17:08:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613221203610636307
Reply addressees: @ShaySha41785173 @Barbara72633997
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613220794636828672
You do realize that you’re engaging in diversion as a means of deception, in order to not reform your bias, right?
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-11 16:28:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613211326742134784
Reply addressees: @nickybrockwell1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613210521037148163
I’d agree. But then that’s a false equivalency that some are more important than others because they are material, or some are more sacred than others because they are intuitionistic.
The net is don’t mother adults – its actually ‘a crime’.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-11 16:21:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613209592783163394
Reply addressees: @nickybrockwell1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613209179220500483
Rather difficult to say meaningful things that require enumeration or sequences in the limits of a tweet. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-11 03:46:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613019493277597701
Reply addressees: @AyaRayArohi @BellesDigs
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613018866216734721
I think you’re missing the point. But I don’t want to have a lengthy discussion on PZ’s feed.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-11 02:46:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613004385872666625
Reply addressees: @sciencefandom @PeterZeihan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613002261478707200
No.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-10 23:06:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612949041171636226
Reply addressees: @Scott29686378 @philosophytweet
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612948271349235713
That said, yes, you’re ‘cut’ is a good one.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-10 22:37:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612941830806540288
Reply addressees: @ContraFabianist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612940047262842880
The point is, that you said nothing of merit, other than that you disapprove. So one shallow meaningless argument deserves a shallow meaningless argument in return.
I’m sorry if the Darwinian properties of the universe offend, you, especially when applied to yourself. But Deal.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-10 21:33:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612925662590820352
Reply addressees: @kblount29 @georealpolitik
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612925018366775298
BTW: The filter doesn’t work. You’re still a 3. ie: Don’t throw stones you don’t want thrown back.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-10 21:07:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612919124471980066
Reply addressees: @kblount29 @georealpolitik
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612917851211309059
Well, unfortunately, no, because I’m active in the field and have been involved in research, and tested about every way possible. I just feel responsible for y’all, and I have a thing against infantilizing, irresponsibility,, evasion, lying, denying, projection and undermining.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-10 21:06:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612918838084902946
Reply addressees: @kblount29 @georealpolitik
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612917851211309059