ONLY THE WEST CAN INVENT WESTERN INSTITUTIONS AND TECHNOLOGIES
Everyone can make use of them. We can all transcend the animal man and become the gods we imagine.
Let a Thousand Nations and Billions of Families Bloom.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-22 08:27:00 UTC
STOP PANDERING TO PEOPLE THAT HATE YOU
Stop pandering to people that hate you, hate your kin, hate your people, hate your culture, hate your traditions, hate your history, and hate your civilization – despite the fact that you and yours have dragged them and theirs out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, disease, hard labor, child mortality, early death, endemic violence, and tyranny.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-22 08:10:00 UTC
The Prussians first, and the Germans in general had ‘got it right’. Aside from immigration they still have it … close to right. What I can’t do is put their cultural biases in analytic prose (neither can they). One of my open questions is ‘why?’ That’s why I need to live there for 18 months. I’ll figure it out. I will. And I’ll figure out how to put it into law.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-20 16:57:00 UTC
WE CAN AFFORD TO SEPARATE, SPECIALIZE, AND SPECIATE
Just as one of our favorite pundits explains that as we become more wealthy, and institutionally and economically equal, we tend rather dramatically to increase our gender bias expressions – also, in all cases, as we become wealthier, we seek to explore our differences and reinforce them rather than pay the cost of adaptation to a norm.
Most conservative liberal conflict is over this difference in conservatives paying costs to conform vs liberals consuming to experiment or explore. With liberals objecting to paying for costs they don’t want to pay directly, and conservatives objective to absorbing costs of liberal consumption and experimentation.
Now, there are two choices: conservatives oppress liberals, or liberals oppress conservatives, or we separate, specialize and speciate.
In other words, somewhere around 3500 years ago we slowed speciation. In the 20th century the left has attempted to reverse it. And they are succeeding – with horridly dysgenic results.
But with very little effort we can now AFFORD to return to speciation.
Fortunately, this is great for conservatives who are naturally eugenic, and great for liberals in the short term who are naturally dysgenic. But in the end it means we will, in the aggregate, return to white and east asian excellence and everything between us will once again decline – until they pose a threat to us out of necessity and envy.
Time to return to speciation.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-20 16:51:00 UTC
(((They))) have this strange intuition that what failed in the levant, and has failed everywhere else, will succeed in the west, if (((They))) only remove territorial, normative, and genetic barriers.
(((They))) have this strange intuition that what failed in the levant, and has failed everywhere else, will succeed in the west, if (((They))) only remove territorial, normative, and genetic barriers.
From: The Fate of Empires by Arthur John Hubbard (via Noah J Revoy) “An increase of women in public life has often been associated with national decline. The later Romans complained that, although Rome ruled the world, women ruled Rome. In the tenth century, a similar tendency was observable in the Arab Empire, the women demanding admission to the Professions hitherto monopolized by men. ‘What,’ wrote the contemporary historian, lbn Bessam, ‘have the professions of clerk, tax-collector or preacher to do with women? These occupations have always been limited to men alone.’ Many women practised law, while others obtained posts as university professors. There was an agitation for the appointment of female judges, which, however, does not appear to have succeeded. Soon after this period, government and public order collapsed, and foreign invaders overran the country. The resulting increase in confusion and violence made it unsafe for women to move unescorted in the streets, with the result that this feminist movement collapsed.”
From: The Fate of Empires by Arthur John Hubbard (via Noah J Revoy) “An increase of women in public life has often been associated with national decline. The later Romans complained that, although Rome ruled the world, women ruled Rome. In the tenth century, a similar tendency was observable in the Arab Empire, the women demanding admission to the Professions hitherto monopolized by men. ‘What,’ wrote the contemporary historian, lbn Bessam, ‘have the professions of clerk, tax-collector or preacher to do with women? These occupations have always been limited to men alone.’ Many women practised law, while others obtained posts as university professors. There was an agitation for the appointment of female judges, which, however, does not appear to have succeeded. Soon after this period, government and public order collapsed, and foreign invaders overran the country. The resulting increase in confusion and violence made it unsafe for women to move unescorted in the streets, with the result that this feminist movement collapsed.”
WOMEN RULE ONLY WHEN MEN CAN NO LONGER REACH CONSENSUS – IT IS A DEATH KNELL
From: The Fate of Empires by Arthur John Hubbard
(via Noah J Revoy)
“An increase of women in public life has often been associated with national decline.
The later Romans complained that, although Rome ruled the world, women
ruled Rome.
In the tenth century, a similar tendency was observable in the Arab Empire, the women demanding admission to the
Professions hitherto monopolized by men.
‘What,’ wrote the contemporary historian, lbn Bessam, ‘have the professions of clerk, tax-collector or preacher to do with women? These occupations have always been limited to men alone.’
Many women practised law, while others obtained posts as university professors. There was an agitation for the appointment of female judges, which, however, does not appear to have succeeded.
Soon after this period, government and public order collapsed, and foreign invaders overran the country. The resulting increase in confusion and violence made it unsafe for women to move unescorted in the streets, with the result that this feminist movement collapsed.”
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-20 10:21:00 UTC
When we try to understand early society in Scandinavia it is obvious that it was decisive for an individual to be part of a family and a social group. You were in a way identified by your affiliation to a family, a group and a society.
The worst punishment you could thus get was to be cut off from this group and society, to be excommunicated or outlawed, which has been described as a ‘social death.’
In other words we can see that our forefathers had another concept of freedom than we have. Freedom was not defined as an individual freedom, but a right to belong to a fellowship, to be part of a social group. A stranger was often considered as an enemy.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-20 10:05:00 UTC