Curt Doolittle updated his status.
—“If you worship your enemy, you are defeated. If you adopt your enemyâs religion, you are enslaved. If you breed with your enemy, you are destroyed.” — Polydoros of Sparta
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 19:38:11 UTC
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
ARISTOTLE: THOSE WITHOUT AGENCY ARE BEASTS TO BE RULED
From Alexander of Macedon by Peter Green
“He had the whole body of Greek civilized opinion
behind him. Euripides held that it was proper (eikos) for
âbarbariansâ to be subject to Greeks. Plato and Isocrates
both thought of all non-Hellenes as natural enemies who
could be enslaved or exterminated at will. Aristotle himself
regarded a war against barbarians as essentially j ust.48 Such
theories may well be dismissed as grotesque; but they are no
more grotesque than de Gobineauâs concept of the Aryan
superman. And grotesque or not, they have the power to
compel belief, and thus to affect menâs lives in the most
fundamental way. When Hitler exterminated the European
Jews, he based his actions, precisely, on the belief that
certain categories of mankind could be dismissed as sub-
human â that is, like Aristotle, he equated them with
beasts or plants.
For Aristotle, however, the brute or vegetable nature of
barbarians had a special quality, which must have struck a
responsive chord in his pupil. âNo one,â he wrote, âwould
value existence for the pleasure of eating alone, or that of
sex . . . unless he were utterly servileâ (i.e. slave or bar-
barian). To such a person, on the other hand, it would
make no difference whether he were beast or man. The key example he cites is the Assyrian voluptuary Sardanapalus
(Assurbanipal): barbarians, it is clear, are to be despised
above all because they live exclusively through and for the senses.
The purely hedonistic life, in fact, was something which
Aristotle taught his pupil to regard as beneath contempt.
Such a doctrine must have had a strong appeal for Alex-
ander, who always placed a premium on self-control and
self-denial (at least during the earlier stages of his career),
and whose enthusiastic, impressionable nature reveals a
strong hero-worshipping streak. (It made no odds to him
whether his hero was mythical or contemporary: he may
have modelled himself on Achilles, but he was equally
ready to adopt the quick-stepping gait of his old tutor
Leonidas.) The Alexander who ate so sparingly, who gave
away the spoils of war with such contemptuous generosity,
keeping little for himself, and who said he was never more
conscious of his own mortality than âduring the time he lay
with a woman or sleptâ50 â this, surely, was a man whose
debt to Aristotleâs teaching and inï¬uence was fundamental.
For good or ill, the years at Mieza left a permanent mark
on him.
Aristotleâs advice on the respective treatment of Greeks
and barbarians is, of course, capable of a more mundane
interpretation: that in order to get the best out of those
whom one intends to exploit, one must humour them far
enough to win their cooperation. Greeks required to be
treated as equals, to have their sense of independence –
however illusory -â fostered with the greatest care. Asiatics,
on the other hand, would only respond to, or respect, a
show of rigorous authoritarianism â the Victorian district
ofï¬cerâs creed. Whether Aristotle intended this lesson or not,
it was one that Alexander learnt all too well. As we shall
see, he applied it to every individual or group with whom he
subsequently came in contact.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 16:47:43 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
IN OTHER WORDS AFRICA WAS A MICROCOSM OF AFRO-EURASIA
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 16:28:09 UTC
photos_and_videos/your_posts/36912310_10156491356507264_3357716410225655808_n_10156491356502264.jpg ARISTOTLE’S ETHNOCENTRISMAlex Annenhttps://youtu.be/6KqkyNnm7BcJul 12, 2018 4:28pmJim KosidloSmart manJul 12, 2018 4:42pmNicholas SmithDiversity divides.Jul 12, 2018 4:57pmJacob SmithIn republic Socrates states the importance of a brotherhood between Hellenic city states that forbids full scale war, advice that the ruling class of the time should have listened to.Jul 12, 2018 5:12pmKarl SchmidtWhy We Fight, by Guillaume FayeJul 12, 2018 5:50pmVivek NaAmazing – he says exactly what I always believed and should be self evident from evolution.
We are less chaotic when surrounded by people like ourselves. Familiarity breeds consentJul 12, 2018 6:13pmSavannah DicksonWho translated this?Jul 12, 2018 7:36pmSavannah DicksonEvery post of Nationalist SocialismJul 12, 2018 7:37pmAndrew ClaytonThe modern trend to treat democracy as a synonym for good is a terrible mistake, assuming it is a mistake… 🤔Jul 12, 2018 7:50pmChrisGabriel Ryan Jonathon PerdisJul 12, 2018 8:03pmDennis NikonovCurt I posted this on your timeline a couple months ago :)Jul 12, 2018 8:13pmOliver CrokeWhat book is that?Jul 12, 2018 8:22pmKarl SchmidtWhy We Fight, by Guillaume Faye. It’s a great book and an easy readJul 12, 2018 8:23pmOliver CrokeThanks!Jul 12, 2018 8:23pmBrian D RobisonBill AlanJul 12, 2018 8:27pmFlorian GeyerMutilating the classics is an abominable crime.Jul 12, 2018 8:58pmJustico Mitchelldemocracy is trash, tho. not on some “voting is violence” “reeee, collectivism” type shit, either.Jul 12, 2018 9:33pmMatthew GenackIt’s less than ideal in a homogeneous country, and dysfunctional in a heterogeneous country.Jul 12, 2018 9:40pmJustico Mitchelli don’t use that many words to say “trash.” i don’t have a great vocabulary.Jul 12, 2018 9:41pmCurt Doolittlenot sure who I got it from other than it wasn’t sharable. Probably you then. lol ;)Jul 12, 2018 9:51pmCurt DoolittleI’m slow sometimes….. ;)Jul 12, 2018 9:51pmChris Dobsonlmao ive been sharing this with ppl for the last 5 yearsJul 13, 2018 12:24amAlex IrizarryWhy do I feel like most of you are confusing ethnic with racial?Jul 13, 2018 4:49amRyan Partingtonmight be trash, but it’s the trashbag with old food in it instead of the trashbag with old used needles in itJul 13, 2018 8:49amRyan PartingtonThis’d be arguing why mutliculturalism doesnt work then. That you can be any size, shape or colour of citizen, but if you dont take part in the culture you’re in it causes friction. Due to your status as a minority group you cant make any political decisions based on your group, which means you have to join up with a larger group. That’s why democrats want open borders and mass immigration, because they’re the party that gets the votes from non-americansJul 13, 2018 8:52amOscar Svanbergit’s true for race aswell.Jul 13, 2018 10:09amJordanus NicolausTiger
wow what a truly excellent reading of aristotle
unparalleled scholarshipJul 13, 2018 10:33amFrederic DurffDiversity of males that is.
Women can adapt to any society as long as they’re provided for. Only males care about kinship.Jul 13, 2018 11:42amJay DizzleDoes anyone know where this came from?Jul 13, 2018 9:00pmMatt DiasBrandon DylanJul 16, 2018 8:29pmAlex IrizarryRyan Partington democrats don’t want open borders lolJul 16, 2018 8:49pmDan BeateauWould you mind telling me the text this is from?Jul 17, 2018 5:25amCurt DoolittleDennis Nikonov What book is the text from? do you know? It turns out I got this image from Twitter. So I don’t know.Jul 17, 2018 11:02amKevin FenchakWhy We Fight by Guillame FayeJul 17, 2018 12:35pmKevin FenchakHis “metapolitical dictionary”Jul 17, 2018 12:35pmDale MillerHISTORY REPEATING ITSELF ! WOW 😮Jul 17, 2018 6:35pmAna KrosniakAnd yet it is not right to reproduce with foreign women and create mutts within the country that is also harmful.Jul 17, 2018 7:57pmKarl SchmidtYeaJul 21, 2018 1:21amFrederic Durff1) That graph has been used over and over again in many debates. It’s highly flawed to use it imo for several reasons:
a) A guy can date outside his race and still want kids from a female of his own race: I sleep with black women and Asian women a lot yet would never have kids with a non-white.
b) Women on dating sites apply rational thinking to their dating preferences. A woman meeting a nice guy that’s not of her race in her every day life would care way less about his race as long as he’s not too ugly/dumb/poor.
c) if that graph was the absolute truth you’d see equal representations in real life: yet black man/white woman is way more prevalent than black woman/white man.
2) the 90% not feminist figure is stupid and only exists because of the way the question is asked and how women associate feminism with nagging, bald or pink-dyed hair activists. But 99% of Western women are feminists.Jul 21, 2018 5:24amARISTOTLE’S ETHNOCENTRISM
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 16:08:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/36912310_10156491356507264_3357716410225655808_n_10156491356502264.jpg ARISTOTLE’S ETHNOCENTRISMAlex Annenhttps://youtu.be/6KqkyNnm7BcJul 12, 2018 4:28pmJim KosidloSmart manJul 12, 2018 4:42pmNicholas SmithDiversity divides.Jul 12, 2018 4:57pmJacob SmithIn republic Socrates states the importance of a brotherhood between Hellenic city states that forbids full scale war, advice that the ruling class of the time should have listened to.Jul 12, 2018 5:12pmKarl SchmidtWhy We Fight, by Guillaume FayeJul 12, 2018 5:50pmVivek NaAmazing – he says exactly what I always believed and should be self evident from evolution.
We are less chaotic when surrounded by people like ourselves. Familiarity breeds consentJul 12, 2018 6:13pmSavannah DicksonWho translated this?Jul 12, 2018 7:36pmSavannah DicksonEvery post of Nationalist SocialismJul 12, 2018 7:37pmAndrew ClaytonThe modern trend to treat democracy as a synonym for good is a terrible mistake, assuming it is a mistake… 🤔Jul 12, 2018 7:50pmChris@[100000554603882:2048:Gabriel Ryan] @[100001051667274:2048:Jonathon Perdis]Jul 12, 2018 8:03pmDennis NikonovCurt I posted this on your timeline a couple months ago :)Jul 12, 2018 8:13pmOliver CrokeWhat book is that?Jul 12, 2018 8:22pmKarl SchmidtWhy We Fight, by Guillaume Faye. It’s a great book and an easy readJul 12, 2018 8:23pmOliver CrokeThanks!Jul 12, 2018 8:23pmBrian D Robison@[100006869018359:2048:Bill Alan]Jul 12, 2018 8:27pmFlorian GeyerMutilating the classics is an abominable crime.Jul 12, 2018 8:58pmJustico Mitchelldemocracy is trash, tho. not on some “voting is violence” “reeee, collectivism” type shit, either.Jul 12, 2018 9:33pmMatthew GenackIt’s less than ideal in a homogeneous country, and dysfunctional in a heterogeneous country.Jul 12, 2018 9:40pmJustico Mitchelli don’t use that many words to say “trash.” i don’t have a great vocabulary.Jul 12, 2018 9:41pmCurt Doolittlenot sure who I got it from other than it wasn’t sharable. Probably you then. lol ;)Jul 12, 2018 9:51pmCurt DoolittleI’m slow sometimes….. ;)Jul 12, 2018 9:51pmChris Dobsonlmao ive been sharing this with ppl for the last 5 yearsJul 13, 2018 12:24amAlex IrizarryWhy do I feel like most of you are confusing ethnic with racial?Jul 13, 2018 4:49amRyan Partingtonmight be trash, but it’s the trashbag with old food in it instead of the trashbag with old used needles in itJul 13, 2018 8:49amRyan PartingtonThis’d be arguing why mutliculturalism doesnt work then. That you can be any size, shape or colour of citizen, but if you dont take part in the culture you’re in it causes friction. Due to your status as a minority group you cant make any political decisions based on your group, which means you have to join up with a larger group. That’s why democrats want open borders and mass immigration, because they’re the party that gets the votes from non-americansJul 13, 2018 8:52amOscar Svanbergit’s true for race aswell.Jul 13, 2018 10:09amJordanus Nicolaus@[623365840:2048:Tiger]
wow what a truly excellent reading of aristotle
unparalleled scholarshipJul 13, 2018 10:33amJay DizzleDoes anyone know where this came from?Jul 13, 2018 9:00pmGregory Aluf KoshkinWhich book?Jul 16, 2018 7:12pmGregory Aluf KoshkinIt works well in Switzerland and Hong Kong. Small scale and homogeneous.Jul 16, 2018 7:14pmMatt Dias@[100013876667622:2048:Brandon Dylan]Jul 16, 2018 8:29pmAlex IrizarryRyan Partington democrats don’t want open borders lolJul 16, 2018 8:49pmDan BeateauWould you mind telling me the text this is from?Jul 17, 2018 5:25amCurt Doolittle@[1300401473:2048:Dennis Nikonov] What book is the text from? do you know? It turns out I got this image from Twitter. So I don’t know.Jul 17, 2018 11:02amKevin FenchakWhy We Fight by Guillame FayeJul 17, 2018 12:35pmKevin FenchakHis “metapolitical dictionary”Jul 17, 2018 12:35pmDale MillerHISTORY REPEATING ITSELF ! WOW 😮Jul 17, 2018 6:35pmMirko LopezLots of luck! America is a diverse, multi ethnic and multi racial society. It works just fine. Get over it!Jul 18, 2018 6:33pmKarl SchmidtYeaJul 21, 2018 1:21amARISTOTLE’S ETHNOCENTRISM
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 16:08:00 UTC
—“If you worship your enemy, you are defeated. If you adopt your enemy’s religion, you are enslaved. If you breed with your enemy, you are destroyed.” — Polydoros of Sparta
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 15:38:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
ARISTOTLE’S ETHNOCENTRISM
—“Aristotle encouraged Alexander toward eastern conquest and Aristotle’s own attitude towards Persia was unabashedly ethnocentric. In one famous example, he counsels Alexander to be “a leader to the Greeks and a despot to the barbarians, to look after the former as after friends and relatives, and to deal with the latter as with beasts or plants”.—
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 14:33:58 UTC
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
WE TRANSCEND – TOGETHER
Love Thyself. Love Thy Kin. Love Thy Nation. But Transcend all of man.
Of course I love my family, tribe, and nation above all. But I also wish every other family and tribe to prosper, evolve, and transcend.
Any man who fights for truth and liberty is my brother. Any man who uses truth and liberty to advance his family, tribe, and nation is a nobleman whom I will reciprocally insure.
This is how our families, tribes, and nations raise each other into transcendence.
And it is the way we build numbers in the world with which to domesticate or eliminate the hordes of animals unable to transcend from beast into man.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 14:24:39 UTC
ARISTOTLE: THOSE WITHOUT AGENCY ARE BEASTS TO BE RULED
From Alexander of Macedon by Peter Green
“He had the whole body of Greek civilized opinion
behind him. Euripides held that it was proper (eikos) for
‘barbarians’ to be subject to Greeks. Plato and Isocrates
both thought of all non-Hellenes as natural enemies who
could be enslaved or exterminated at will. Aristotle himself
regarded a war against barbarians as essentially j ust.48 Such
theories may well be dismissed as grotesque; but they are no
more grotesque than de Gobineau’s concept of the Aryan
superman. And grotesque or not, they have the power to
compel belief, and thus to affect men’s lives in the most
fundamental way. When Hitler exterminated the European
Jews, he based his actions, precisely, on the belief that
certain categories of mankind could be dismissed as sub-
human — that is, like Aristotle, he equated them with
beasts or plants.
For Aristotle, however, the brute or vegetable nature of
barbarians had a special quality, which must have struck a
responsive chord in his pupil. ‘No one,’ he wrote, ‘would
value existence for the pleasure of eating alone, or that of
sex . . . unless he were utterly servile’ (i.e. slave or bar-
barian). To such a person, on the other hand, it would
make no difference whether he were beast or man. The key example he cites is the Assyrian voluptuary Sardanapalus
(Assurbanipal): barbarians, it is clear, are to be despised
above all because they live exclusively through and for the senses.
The purely hedonistic life, in fact, was something which
Aristotle taught his pupil to regard as beneath contempt.
Such a doctrine must have had a strong appeal for Alex-
ander, who always placed a premium on self-control and
self-denial (at least during the earlier stages of his career),
and whose enthusiastic, impressionable nature reveals a
strong hero-worshipping streak. (It made no odds to him
whether his hero was mythical or contemporary: he may
have modelled himself on Achilles, but he was equally
ready to adopt the quick-stepping gait of his old tutor
Leonidas.) The Alexander who ate so sparingly, who gave
away the spoils of war with such contemptuous generosity,
keeping little for himself, and who said he was never more
conscious of his own mortality than ‘during the time he lay
with a woman or slept’50 — this, surely, was a man whose
debt to Aristotle’s teaching and influence was fundamental.
For good or ill, the years at Mieza left a permanent mark
on him.
Aristotle’s advice on the respective treatment of Greeks
and barbarians is, of course, capable of a more mundane
interpretation: that in order to get the best out of those
whom one intends to exploit, one must humour them far
enough to win their cooperation. Greeks required to be
treated as equals, to have their sense of independence –
however illusory -— fostered with the greatest care. Asiatics,
on the other hand, would only respond to, or respect, a
show of rigorous authoritarianism — the Victorian district
officer’s creed. Whether Aristotle intended this lesson or not,
it was one that Alexander learnt all too well. As we shall
see, he applied it to every individual or group with whom he
subsequently came in contact.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 12:47:00 UTC
http://www.newsweek.com/humans-did-not-evolve-single-population-africa-researchers-say-1018143?amp=1http://www.newsweek.com/humans-did-not-evolve-single-population-africa-researchers-say-1018143?amp=1IN OTHER WORDS AFRICA WAS A MICROCOSM OF AFRO-EURASIA
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 12:28:00 UTC