Curt Doolittle

Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • COPERNICUS’ CHILDREN Copernicus never married and is not known to have had child

    COPERNICUS’ CHILDREN

    Copernicus never married and is not known to have had children, but from at least 1531 until 1539 his relations with Anna Schilling, a live-in housekeeper, were seen as scandalous by two bishops of Warmia who urged him over the years to break off relations with his “mistress”. His sister Katharina married the businessman and Toruń city councilor Barthel Gertner and left five children, whom Copernicus looked after to the end of his life.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-23 17:14:00 UTC

  • GALILEO’S CHILDREN Despite being a genuinely pious Roman Catholic, Galileo fathe

    GALILEO’S CHILDREN

    Despite being a genuinely pious Roman Catholic, Galileo fathered three children out of wedlock with Marina Gamba. They had two daughters, Virginia (born in 1600) and Livia (born in 1601), and a son, Vincenzo (born in 1606).

    Because of their illegitimate birth, their father considered the girls unmarriageable, if not posing problems of prohibitively expensive support or dowries, which would have been similar to Galileo’s previous extensive financial problems with two of his sisters.

    Their only worthy alternative was the religious life. Both girls were accepted by the convent of San Matteo in Arcetri and remained there for the rest of their lives.

    Virginia took the name Maria Celeste upon entering the convent. She died on 2 April 1634, and is buried with Galileo at the Basilica of Santa Croce, Florence.

    Livia took the name Sister Arcangela and was ill for most of her life. Vincenzo was later legitimised as the legal heir of Galileo and married Sestilia Bocchineri.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-23 17:12:00 UTC

  • Diversity? Never confuse vacation, and cooperation, with cohabitation

    Diversity? Never confuse vacation, and cooperation, with cohabitation.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-23 15:53:00 UTC

  • Life in the states is certainly much easier. Everything mostly works. Even if it

    Life in the states is certainly much easier. Everything mostly works. Even if it’s rude. Life in Ukraine is harder, and many things don’t work well. But it’s more civilized, and far less rude.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-23 15:51:00 UTC

  • The Propertarian Paradigm of History

    1 – THE BRONZE AGE THE BRONZE AGE COLLAPSE (Dark Age 1) 2 – THE EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN PERIOD THE MEDITERRANEAN (GRECO ROMAN) PERIOD (IRON) ABRAHAMIC (SEMITIC) DARK AGE (Dark Age 2) 3 – CONTINENTAL PERIOD > NORDIC PERIOD > ATLANTIC PERIOD (STEEL) COLONIALISM …. > (FRENCH UNDERCLASS REVOLUTION …. > napoleonic authoritarian monopoly > WW1) > *THE POST WAR PERIOD* …. COMMUNISM ( WW2>COLD WAR (KOREA > VIETNAM > STAR WARS)) >ISLAMISM. THE REBALANCING OF WORLD POWERS PERIOD (TRUMP) … The completion of the second european period. Or…. (Dark Age 3) ??? THE POST WAR ERA From the end of WWI to the fall of the soviet union: the period of international consensus. This covers the period of transition from european colonialism to world consumer capitalism. The world fights the very markets that provide for our prosperity. THE COMMON HISTORIAN PARADIGM I think most historians use the fall of the soviet union in 1992, and I tend to include the conversion of communism to islamism as a continuation of the anti-market consumer capitalism process – one that cannot e solved without repairing arbitrary middle eastern borders. MY PROPERTARIAN PARADIGM (Important) My reading of history is that Marxism>Communism>Islamism constitute the second Semitic Attack on Western Civilization, by an attempt to repeat the means by which the Greco Roman, Persian, Egyptian, North African, and Old European civilizations were destroyed, and converted from aristocratic MARKETS between civilizations to underclass(religious) MONOPOLY that destroyed the growth of those civilizations. ARISTOCRATIC MARKETS, UNDERCLASS MONOPOLY The cycle of history appears to be the entire world of aristocratic and evolutionary markets against the semitic authoritarian devolutionary monopoly.

  • The Propertarian Paradigm of History

    1 – THE BRONZE AGE THE BRONZE AGE COLLAPSE (Dark Age 1) 2 – THE EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN PERIOD THE MEDITERRANEAN (GRECO ROMAN) PERIOD (IRON) ABRAHAMIC (SEMITIC) DARK AGE (Dark Age 2) 3 – CONTINENTAL PERIOD > NORDIC PERIOD > ATLANTIC PERIOD (STEEL) COLONIALISM …. > (FRENCH UNDERCLASS REVOLUTION …. > napoleonic authoritarian monopoly > WW1) > *THE POST WAR PERIOD* …. COMMUNISM ( WW2>COLD WAR (KOREA > VIETNAM > STAR WARS)) >ISLAMISM. THE REBALANCING OF WORLD POWERS PERIOD (TRUMP) … The completion of the second european period. Or…. (Dark Age 3) ??? THE POST WAR ERA From the end of WWI to the fall of the soviet union: the period of international consensus. This covers the period of transition from european colonialism to world consumer capitalism. The world fights the very markets that provide for our prosperity. THE COMMON HISTORIAN PARADIGM I think most historians use the fall of the soviet union in 1992, and I tend to include the conversion of communism to islamism as a continuation of the anti-market consumer capitalism process – one that cannot e solved without repairing arbitrary middle eastern borders. MY PROPERTARIAN PARADIGM (Important) My reading of history is that Marxism>Communism>Islamism constitute the second Semitic Attack on Western Civilization, by an attempt to repeat the means by which the Greco Roman, Persian, Egyptian, North African, and Old European civilizations were destroyed, and converted from aristocratic MARKETS between civilizations to underclass(religious) MONOPOLY that destroyed the growth of those civilizations. ARISTOCRATIC MARKETS, UNDERCLASS MONOPOLY The cycle of history appears to be the entire world of aristocratic and evolutionary markets against the semitic authoritarian devolutionary monopoly.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE PROPERTARIAN PARADIGM OF HISTORY 1 – THE

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE PROPERTARIAN PARADIGM OF HISTORY

    1 – THE BRONZE AGE
    THE BRONZE AGE COLLAPSE (Dark Age 1)

    2 – THE EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN PERIOD
    THE MEDITERRANEAN (GRECO ROMAN) PERIOD (IRON)
    ABRAHAMIC (SEMITIC) DARK AGE (Dark Age 2)

    3 – CONTINENTAL PERIOD > NORDIC PERIOD >
    ATLANTIC PERIOD (STEEL)
    COLONIALISM
    …. > (FRENCH UNDERCLASS REVOLUTION
    …. > napoleonic authoritarian monopoly >
    WW1) > *THE POST WAR PERIOD*
    …. COMMUNISM ( WW2>COLD WAR (KOREA > VIETNAM > STAR WARS)) >ISLAMISM.
    THE REBALANCING OF WORLD POWERS PERIOD (TRUMP)
    … The completion of the second european period.
    Or…. (Dark Age 3) ???

    THE POST WAR ERA
    From the end of WWI to the fall of the soviet union: the period of international consensus. This covers the period of transition from european colonialism to world consumer capitalism. The world fights the very markets that provide for our prosperity.

    THE COMMON HISTORIAN PARADIGM
    I think most historians use the fall of the soviet union in 1992, and I tend to include the conversion of communism to islamism as a continuation of the anti-market consumer capitalism process – one that cannot e solved without repairing arbitrary middle eastern borders.

    MY PROPERTARIAN PARADIGM (Important)
    My reading of history is that Marxism>Communism>Islamism constitute the second Semitic Attack on Western Civilization, by an attempt to repeat the means by which the Greco Roman, Persian, Egyptian, North African, and Old European civilizations were destroyed, and converted from aristocratic MARKETS between civilizations to underclass(religious) MONOPOLY that destroyed the growth of those civilizations.

    ARISTOCRATIC MARKETS, UNDERCLASS MONOPOLY
    The cycle of history appears to be the entire world of aristocratic and evolutionary markets against the semitic authoritarian devolutionary monopoly.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 19:31:27 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. MORON QUESTION OF THE DAY. —“What’s your po

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    MORON QUESTION OF THE DAY.

    —“What’s your position on mixing?”—

    Which question are you asking me? As a jurist of natural law? As a public intellectual practicing political economy seeking political solutions to optimum flourishing? Or as an anglo northern european man seeking the intersets of my people? Or as a man who loves his kinfolk first and foremost?

    As a jurist of natural law it is a question for a polity to choose mixing or not, since underclass mixing seems to be as beneficial as working, middle, and upper class race mixing is counter-productive. And as such the optimum conditions for all are to create many states, that produce commons that reflect the interests of the people who live in them. Nationalism is in the interests of all people.

    As a public intellectual it’s clearly superior politically and economically to create homogenous nation states. For my people as for all other peoples.

    As a northern european, I prefer others of my kin don’t mix, and I want my people and civilization to survive, and prosper. Just as I do for all other peoples.

    As an individual, am certain that I don’t choose to mix (and I have tried). But as such I won’t choose for all other peoples.

    DEMONSTRATED PREFERENCE
    But I dont just talk about it – I demonstrated that I prefer to live in a traditional, religious, homogenous country. Although, I would prefer to live in old new england, or old england, or old normandy, old netherlands, or maybe old denmark if I could – since those are the origins of my people. But due to conquest by french, cosmopolitans, and marxists, I cannot do so.

    RECIPROCITY
    But I will not force the choice for others. Only prevent others from making the choice for me and those that agree with me.

    Any man who will work to help me make a nation for me and mine, I will by reciprocity help to make a nation for he and his.

    Any man who seeks to stop me and mine from creating a nation that provides the optimum for our kin interests is an enemy and I will work against him at the cost of my life and his.

    NATURAL LAW ON INVOLUNTARY ASSOCIATION
    Under natural law, heterogeneity is not a choice that is open to restitution (repair) and therefore involuntary imposition is against the law of nature and of men, and as such must be prosecuted, and the only restitution for genocide is genocide – a consequence for which western politicians should tremble and fear.

    All men who fight for nationalism are our brothers in arms. All others are merely obstacles to be ended.

    Revolt. Separate. Prosper. Speciate.

    CRITICISM OF THE MAN IN THE MIRROR
    You have simple answers if you’re a simple person with simple responsibilities, particularly if you are only vaguely responsible for yourself.

    Those of us who are more sophisticated, more able, with wider affect, and broader responsibilities, who work to take responsibilities for tribe, nation, race, and mankind have more sophisticated answers.

    Don’t equate us other than in our interests. In my world I work for in the intersets of the common moral people, and against the interests of parasites and fools.

    ***Is that clear enough (you f-cking idiot). WN is trash because only fucking morons are stupid enough to take the short obvious, selfish, moron-route to political change.***

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 18:56:56 UTC

  • THE PROPERTARIAN PARADIGM OF HISTORY 1 – THE BRONZE AGE THE BRONZE AGE COLLAPSE

    THE PROPERTARIAN PARADIGM OF HISTORY

    1 – THE BRONZE AGE

    THE BRONZE AGE COLLAPSE (Dark Age 1)

    2 – THE EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN PERIOD

    THE MEDITERRANEAN (GRECO ROMAN) PERIOD (IRON)

    ABRAHAMIC (SEMITIC) DARK AGE (Dark Age 2)

    3 – CONTINENTAL PERIOD > NORDIC PERIOD >

    ATLANTIC PERIOD (STEEL)

    COLONIALISM

    …. > (FRENCH UNDERCLASS REVOLUTION

    …. > napoleonic authoritarian monopoly >

    WW1) > *THE POST WAR PERIOD*

    …. COMMUNISM ( WW2>COLD WAR (KOREA > VIETNAM > STAR WARS)) >ISLAMISM.

    THE REBALANCING OF WORLD POWERS PERIOD (TRUMP)

    … The completion of the second european period.

    Or…. (Dark Age 3) ???

    THE POST WAR ERA

    From the end of WWI to the fall of the soviet union: the period of international consensus. This covers the period of transition from european colonialism to world consumer capitalism. The world fights the very markets that provide for our prosperity.

    THE COMMON HISTORIAN PARADIGM

    I think most historians use the fall of the soviet union in 1992, and I tend to include the conversion of communism to islamism as a continuation of the anti-market consumer capitalism process – one that cannot e solved without repairing arbitrary middle eastern borders.

    MY PROPERTARIAN PARADIGM (Important)

    My reading of history is that Marxism>Communism>Islamism constitute the second Semitic Attack on Western Civilization, by an attempt to repeat the means by which the Greco Roman, Persian, Egyptian, North African, and Old European civilizations were destroyed, and converted from aristocratic MARKETS between civilizations to underclass(religious) MONOPOLY that destroyed the growth of those civilizations.

    ARISTOCRATIC MARKETS, UNDERCLASS MONOPOLY

    The cycle of history appears to be the entire world of aristocratic and evolutionary markets against the semitic authoritarian devolutionary monopoly.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 15:31:00 UTC

  • Ok. So imagine this. Every city dwelling family and most suburban families have

    Ok. So imagine this. Every city dwelling family and most suburban families have a ‘country house’, even if it’s just a garden shed, or a cottage, and a couple of acres of land.

    How does that change the way of life?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 10:40:00 UTC