Curt Doolittle updated his status.
Prosperity creates opportunity for self expression. All these anti-civilizational people: Antifa, Leftists, addicts, parasites, the psychotic, the immoral, the criminal, and the perverted are self-selecting. One needn’t ask them to wear badges or tattoos. They cannot escape the history of their behavior – its written in, on, and in records of them.
Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 13:24:38 UTC
Find a woman who wants six or more children. Live where you can afford to have them. The rest of the defectors will be outbred in three generations (90 years).
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 12:22:00 UTC
https://twitter.com/TOOEdit/status/1023311716422049793https://twitter.com/TOOEdit/status/1023311716422049793WHITES ARE LESS CLANNISH (RACIST) THAN OTHER GROUPS – THATS JUST THE SCIENCE OF IT.
—“Interesting thought from Kevin MacDonald that I haven’t pondered before – many high-performing whites so aspie that they feel nothing for their people?”— John Mark
https://twitter.com/TOOEdit/status/1023311716422049793
Jayman and HBDChick both suggest that we developed lower clannishness, and the research supports it. The question is why. Either the value of human life in low population density (cold), or the cold’s influence on neoteny, or both.
Since it does not appear in the siberians/alut/amerindians (they are super predators) but it does in the east asians who have even greater neoteny than we do (to their detriment – although they use nationalism and racism as a defense against the weakness).
I suggest that it’s more likely the result of the mixture of pastoralism agrarianism metalworking, and winters, and the downward expansion of the middle class under manorialism.
I also suggest whites have far greater agency than any others, which is a male genetic property. This is why we differ from east asians. We have greater agency despite our parallel neoteny.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 12:20:00 UTC
https://twitter.com/TOOEdit/status/1023311716422049793WHITES ARE LESS CLANNISH (RACIST) THAN OTHER GROUPS – THATS JUST THE SCIENCE OF IT.
—“Interesting thought from Kevin MacDonald that I haven’t pondered before – many high-performing whites so aspie that they feel nothing for their people?”— John Mark
https://twitter.com/TOOEdit/status/1023311716422049793
Jayman and HBDChick both suggest that we developed lower clannishness, and the research supports it. The question is why. Either the value of human life in low population density (cold), or the cold’s influence on neoteny, or both.
Since it does not appear in the siberians/alut/amerindians (they are super predators) but it does in the east asians who have even greater neoteny than we do (to their detriment – although they use nationalism and racism as a defense against the weakness).
I suggest that it’s more likely the result of the mixture of pastoralism agrarianism metalworking, and winters, and the downward expansion of the middle class under manorialism.
I also suggest whites have far greater agency than any others, which is a male genetic property. This is why we differ from east asians. We have greater agency despite our parallel neoteny.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 12:20:00 UTC
Prosperity creates opportunity for self expression. All these anti-civilizational people: Antifa, Leftists, addicts, parasites, the psychotic, the immoral, the criminal, and the perverted are self-selecting. One needn’t ask them to wear badges or tattoos. They cannot escape the history of their behavior – its written in, on, and in records of them.
Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 09:24:00 UTC
Just say it. “These are *my* people. My kin. My past. My future. Mine.” And then act like it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-31 22:56:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1024428492648316929
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
Just say it. “These are *my* people. My kin. My past. My future. Mine.” And then act like it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-31 22:55:49 UTC
The duel for honor vs sniping for harm. We have see from thousands of video examples, that black culture habituates and promote ‘sniping’ (sucker punching), ganging-up, beating-while-down, and worse, beating while unconscious. This is antithetical to white culture, that has habituated the duel for thousands of years. In the white history of the duel, two men (and women for that matter) may settle disputes with judicial sanction as long as they are equally equipped, no others interfere, and no ‘advantage taken’ when a man is down. However, if any of these rules is violated, the seconds (insurers of each party) may kill in the present or future those who violate it. This means all men are sovereign. But this is antithetical to peoples outside of the indo european tradition of judicial duels between sovereigns.
The duel for honor vs sniping for harm. We have see from thousands of video examples, that black culture habituates and promote ‘sniping’ (sucker punching), ganging-up, beating-while-down, and worse, beating while unconscious. This is antithetical to white culture, that has habituated the duel for thousands of years. In the white history of the duel, two men (and women for that matter) may settle disputes with judicial sanction as long as they are equally equipped, no others interfere, and no ‘advantage taken’ when a man is down. However, if any of these rules is violated, the seconds (insurers of each party) may kill in the present or future those who violate it. This means all men are sovereign. But this is antithetical to peoples outside of the indo european tradition of judicial duels between sovereigns.
by Daniel Gurpide Multiculturalism also leads directly to the death of beauty in art. Different cultures have vastly different ideas of beauty. Michelangelo did not produce African masks. Chopin did not write rap or beat on hollow logs. John William Waterhouse and Jackson Pollock inhabited very different inner worlds. In a multicultural society, standards and traditions are abandoned. European standards are necessarily too ‘Eurocentric’; no group may impose its standards on any other—nor even maintain its own traditions for long. In painting, sculpture, architecture, music, literature, and the decorative arts, there is no longer a ‘centre.’ The continuity of thousands of years is broken. There is chaos. The real danger of art for egalitarians is that it offers ideals and models, and those ideals—in classical European art—are not egalitarian ideals, nor are the models politically correct. If you are trying to prepare students to be rootless, cosmopolitan citizens of the New World Order, you certainly do not want them to come into contact with the undemocratic spirit of Homer or Shakespeare. From it all, a bland, offensive-to-no-one, make-it-as-cheaply-as-possible artistic ethos invades our lives from every side, coupled with an avant-garde which revels in the equally empty perverse. Again, as we begin to live in a society of ugly people, wherever we look we see ugly paintings, ugly advertisements, ugly clothing, ugly body deformations and decorations, and ugly buildings. A people disconnected from its own traditions of beauty—a people inundated with the bland and ugly, mingled with the weird and trendy and ugly—is sickened and greatly weakened.