Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • The Heathens(Naturalists) Were Vastly More Effective than the Abrahamics (Supernaturalists)

    It is just clear that Heathens (non-abrahamics) in the ancient world and ‘pagans’ (post-Abrahamics) in the modern world were thousands of times more effective than Abrahamists, who by and large manufactured ignorance and superstition, causing the Abrahamic Dark Age of ignorance and dragging every civilization it touched into collapse.

  • The Heathens(Naturalists) Were Vastly More Effective than the Abrahamics (Supernaturalists)

    It is just clear that Heathens (non-abrahamics) in the ancient world and ‘pagans’ (post-Abrahamics) in the modern world were thousands of times more effective than Abrahamists, who by and large manufactured ignorance and superstition, causing the Abrahamic Dark Age of ignorance and dragging every civilization it touched into collapse.

  • You know, there is a reason britain excelled when they taught the Nicomachean et

    You know, there is a reason britain excelled when they taught the Nicomachean ethics – and declined when they stopped.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 20:08:00 UTC

  • THE REALITY OF RACES, SUBRACES, MINOR RACES Races, Subraces, Tribes, Clans, Fami

    THE REALITY OF RACES, SUBRACES, MINOR RACES

    Races, Subraces, Tribes, Clans, Families and Classes can interbreed, but differences matter. The primary differences are the degree of neoteny (white and east asian) vs deeper maturity (semites, iranics, africans, and australoids), the more feminine or masculine structure of the brain (yes really), and the size of the underclass due largely to winter climates, manorial farming, and close cohabitation in winters while caring for animals. (Or in the european and chinese cases, aggressive use of criminal punishment – particularly european hanging of large portions of the underclasses every generation).

    Using size of class, degree of neoteny or maturity, and balance of masculine and feminine traits, each of the Races, Subraces, an sometimes Tribes, has evolved (adapted) for certain excellences that are geography, climate, means of production, and method of socialization dependent.

    Human domestication like animal domestication, uses neotonic selection to suppress sexual maturity and preserve the features and cooperative intuitions of youth. The goal for any polity is to increase intelligence, industriousness, and trust. Counter to our assumptions the San (the oldest continuous tribe) were more gentle, and humans appear to have become increasingly AGGRESSIVE in some regions and increasingly GENTLE in other regions, which is easily measurable by group testosterone distributions, rates and ages of maturity, and ‘hardiness’ of features (deeper maturity). By the upward redistribution of reproduction (china, europe, and jewish) you increase the distribution of neoteny in the public largely by the reduction of rates of reproduction of the underclasses. The simple fact is that many people are a harm to their fellows simply because they are a drag on norms, laws, traditions, values, and institutions, literacy, technology, and the work force capacity – perhaps most importantly making a sufficient middle class to produce a voluntary organization of possible impossible, and forcing the dependence upon familial corruption (india, south america, south europe, all of islam) despite access to trade routes.

    THE OPTIMUM POLITICAL ORDER

    The optimum political order is homogenous – diversity is always and everywhere bad for obvious and well documented reasons. It trades short term profits for long term costs that destroy the political order and reduce it to levantine, south american, and indian levels of poverty and corruption.

    The optimum political order is Small – The only value of scale military power to exploit others. The only value of federations is to produce defense of trade routes and prohibit rent seeking (corruption) on those trade routes.

    THE EUGENICISTS WERE RIGHT.

    And any group of size (the east asians) who succeed will leave the rest of the world behind. The europeans managed by the late middle ages to nearly eliminate their underclasses. This is why european intelligence is dropping (the flynn effect is reversing). Not because of individuals. But because of restoration of their underclasses. If Norway can lose IQ (they have) then any group can.

    Smarter people are more moral – simply because they can afford to be.

    “NO MORE LIES”


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 20:05:00 UTC

  • THE PSEUDO-SCIENTIFIC ATTACK ON CIVILIZATION. The curse of postmodern pseudoscie

    THE PSEUDO-SCIENTIFIC ATTACK ON CIVILIZATION.

    The curse of postmodern pseudoscience in most of the other answers. Postmodernism like Marxism was designed, like Abrahamic Religions, as an attack on European Peoples (civilization), to eradicate our civlization in the modern world just as Abrahamic religion was used to eradicate the five great civilizations of the ancient world: Roman New Europe), Byzantine (old europe), Anatolian, Persian (Iranic), Egyptian, and North African. All those civilizations were destroyed by the last attempt at cultural destruction.

    Why? Marxism/Postmodernism in the modern world, and Abrahamic Religion in the ancient world foster dysgenic rapid reproduction of the underclasses reversing genetic domestication under small farm mixed agrarianism, effectively weaponizing reproduction and ignorance and superstition against civilization.

    There are reasons that the Han, Koreans,Japanese and Europeans succeeded and other civilizations failed to maintain rates of innovation. The reason is that the Han, Koreans and Japanese remained insular and homogeneous, and whites succeed as long as they also remain homogeneous and practice eugenic reproduction through manorialism (meritocracy).

    The rest of the world did the opposite and the sizes of their underclasses pose such a burden that they cannot produce sufficient middle and upper classes to produce high trust commercially successful political orders.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 20:04:00 UTC

  • I mean, what is the history of Greece other than the attempt to keep the east –

    I mean, what is the history of Greece other than the attempt to keep the east – first the Hittites (anatolian indo europeans) and the Semites (afro-asiatics) – at bay?

    And then alexander had to go and reverse the problem…


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 20:00:00 UTC

  • Let me help you. A TEMPLE was a BANK. That’s why. Sep 1, 2018, 7:34 AM

    https://www.ancient.eu/article/974/banking-in-the-roman-world/Again. Let me help you. A TEMPLE was a BANK. That’s why.

    https://www.ancient.eu/article/974/banking-in-the-roman-world/Updated Sep 1, 2018, 7:34 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 19:52:00 UTC

  • The abrahamic, marxist-feminist-postmodernist struggle against white man. Versus

    The abrahamic, marxist-feminist-postmodernist struggle against white man. Versus the classical and modern struggle against nature. It’s no wonder they created ignorance and stagnation wherever they went.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 19:51:00 UTC

  • “Q: Why do people refer to American whites as Caucasian?”— Of the four major r

    –“Q: Why do people refer to American whites as Caucasian?”—

    Of the four major races: Negroid, Australoid, Mongoloid, and Caucusoid, we tend to use the term ‘Caucasian’ to refer to Europeans, because that’s the only choice the government gives us on our surveys.

    To be accurate it should be northern european (atlantic-germanic) eastern european (slavic), southern european(mediterranean), old european(balkans), anatolian european (greek, sardinian, boot of italy). Iranic, semitic, turkic. and so on.

    This is more important in america because we have had a civil war over race and we are very close to having another.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 19:41:00 UTC

  • ON MANNERBUND I agree with the ‘sentiment’ of the Mannerbund narrative, but I ex

    ON MANNERBUND

    I agree with the ‘sentiment’ of the Mannerbund narrative, but I express it as ‘it all begins with the militia’, and the militia functions on the brotherhood of warriors. I disagree with the Social Matters / Mannerbund in that the fact that our civilization begins there, does not mean it is SUFFICIENT to defeat enemies, or that much can be made of that ‘feeling’ alone. What binds people are incentive to bind with one another.

    Many of you are seeking the sense of safety and power in the pack and the restoration of our institutions of brotherhood throughout society due to the intentional destruction of them by the deconstructionists in marxism, femininsm, postmodernism, who exploit a ready willingness in our female population to defect by sh-t testing us.

    But you are making the mistake of an intuitionistic bias that is VERY RARE, instead of providing MAJOR incentives (military, political, economic, personal wealth, agency, status, and a plan to get there you are searching in the dark for emotional support, rallying without resources to do so.

    Those institutions of brotherhood are the last good we will achieve, not the first. They are a premium achieved for having worked to obtain military, political, economic, wealth, status benefits.

    Men will REPORT affiliation for sentiments.

    Men will DEMONSTRATE conviction for material rewards.

    The feeling of safety of the pack comes only from the shared experience of working as a pack to produce an outcome which provides an alternative to the present, yet promises only chaos because of an ABSENCE OF VISION.

    I do not operate from your perspective but work backward to achieve that emotion through demonstrated action together by the use of incentives to achieve material success.

    The answer to our problem is to provide an actionable plan the end result is mannerbund.

    That actionable plan is a means of altering the status quo such that POSSIBLE demands are met.

    One does not defeat a fortress by direct attack, but by starving it. One does not threaten potential allies but pays them off. One does not create incentives for defenders of the fortress by promises of suffering, but promising them returns.

    Once the fortress is won, the holdouts must be flayed and salted and hung from the walls for their crimes.

    All revolutions are suspect in prospect but deterministic in retrospect.

    It’s time to win.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 19:16:00 UTC