Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

The Flip Side of Colonialism
October 9th, 2018 9:31 AM THE FLIP SIDE OF COLONIALISM
1. Colonialism was a profound if not most profound good since the invention of farming – we dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, disease, hard labor, child mortality, early death, suffering, tyranny, and subjectivity to the vicissitudes of nature – kicking and screaming all the while.
2. Slavery was universal and whites were more frequently the subject of it (by muslims) than perpetrators of it. Whites are not malaria-immune but many blacks are. Whites have higher (hotter) metabolisms, and blacks don’t. Whites had to be taken from the criminal class. Africans were captured by other africans as prisoners of war in order to attempt to unify west african empires (which would have happened).
3. Creating middle classes by resource exploitation, and selling manufactured (value added) goods to developing peoples was the only means possible of dragging the vast body of dirty, ignorant, superstitious, violent, poor, disease ridden, un-domesticated human animals out of of their condition, and reforming their societies incrementally until they themselves could create a middle class civilization capable of self governance without threat to more advanced civilizations.
Our failure was only in having the european civil wars and leaving our project incomplete. That failure led to the only significant problem of colonialism: (a) the failure to complete the replacement french despotism with english developmentalism. (b) the absence of the technology of fiat money credit that would have eliminated the need for gold and resource extraction. (c) the collapse left an opening for French Socialism, Jewish Communism, Islamic Fundamentalism. (d) the introduction of medicines and health science without the introduction of eugenics (birth control). (e) the failure of our investments in the third world which generally were too insubstantial to do other than delay or inhibit internal growth of demand. This meant that the warm weather colonies most able to produce high value goods (particularly sugar) with Africans, and therefore (a) had more survivors, (b) spread the genres of previously constrained peoples to new territories, (c) forcibly modernized both cultures, civilizations and Genes. And it was not ‘known’ that enslaved primitives were capable of civilized behavior at the time. It was only in the 19th century after the industrial revolution that we found that citizens were more profitable than serfs, were more profitable than slaves. I don’t ignore anything. I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job to expose and educate the ignorant, unable, sophomoric, and willingly deceptive. ã lol
October 9, 2018
No, The Byzantines Weren’t Roman

October 9th, 2018 12:17 PM NO THE BYZANTINES WEREN’T ROMAN AND THE EASTERN ROMAN EMPIRE HAD LITTLE IF NOTHING TO DO WITH ROME OR EUROPE.CHRISTIANITY IS JEWISH, SYRIAN, AND GRECO-ANATOLIAN Ethnically, culturally, organizationally, they were Anatolians and the greek aristocracy (european conquerors) of the athenians and spartans lost. We treat old europe (southeast europe) as european (atlantic+scandinavian + germanic+ celtic+ italic ) but this is just a convention. The balkans were old europe (anatolians), and remain anatolians (I haplogroup), and were not european, or roman, merely a ROMAN CONQUEST of the western Greek Empire. The holy roman empire was neither holy nor roman. The byzantine empire was neither european or roman, but anatolian/syrian. The balkans and greece today are still Anatolian and Muslim, and poor, and low trust, and corrupt. The boot of italy is still ethnically anatolian (greek), and that is why italy consists of two countries: germanic north and greek south. There are no Itals any more than there are Etrus, or Hellenes. There never were romans in Constantinople. There were merely greeks, balkans, anatolians, and syrians that held onto the roman name the way the germans held onto the roman name, and the church held onto the roman name: for status. Roman Empire was, as all european peoples, a religion of the Hearth and Land (“Heathen”). The jews, syrians, and greco-anatolians manufactured this false religion, and imposed it upon the european peoples in order to destroy the aristocratic recovery of rome after the invasion and the plague – a plague given to the west via byzantium. 1 – INDO EUROPEAN EXPANSION BEGINS THE GREAT SHIFT 2 – MESOPOTAMIAN EMPIRES EVOLVE SUMER->ACADIAN->ASSYRIAN (AND LATER ->BABYLONIAN) which appear to have been a locally originating subrace, and Sumerian neither semitic nor indo-european.) 2 – HITTITES(EUROPEANS) AND EGYPTIANS EXHAUST EACH OTHER FIGHTING OVER THE TRADE ROUTES. 3 – ASSYRIANS(MESOPOTAMIANS) CONQUER HITTITES (AND LEVANT/ANATOLIA) 4 – THE SEA PEOPLES (EUROPEANS) RAID AND DEFEAT ALL OLD WORLD CIVS EXCEPT EGYPT BY COLLAPSING WORLD TRADE (but egypt never recovers). 5 – ELAM(West Asians)->PERSIANS(EASTERN INDO EUROPEANS) ESTABLISH THE ACHAEMENID EMPIRE AND THREATEN GREECE 6 – GREEKS CONQUER ANATOLIA TO PERSIA TO EGYPT. (Macedon) (“Greece” is not the peninsula alone but the peninsula and the lands around the aegean, including the peloponnese, islands, and western anatolian coast. 7 – ROMANS CONQUER GREEKS. (Rome) 8 – GREEKS RE-CONQUER ROMANS (Bosphorus-Constantinople) by imposing middle eastern cults and religio-administrative rule in the Persian and Egyptian model. 9 – SELJUKS CONQUER ARABS, THEN EVENTUALLY GREEKS (Bosphorus -> Balkans and enter old europe) 10 – GERMANICS (Europeans) CONQUER SELJUKS, ARABS – THE NEW WORLD, AND ASIA 11 – JEWS AND MUSLIMS STAGE THE SECOND RECONQUEST OF EUROPA: MARXISM-SOCIALISM-POSTMODERNISM-FEMINISM AS AN INTELLECTUAL VANGUARD, WITH MUSLIMS PRACTICING RAIDING, TERRORISM, AND IMMIGRATION TO THE POINT OF FAILURE. THAT’S HISTORY. THATS HISTORY IN A NUTSHELL.

October 9, 2018
Temples Functioned as Banks

October 9th, 2018 9:45 AM [T]he only historic facts we know are that (a) someone seems to have existed, (b) the fact that temples functioned as banks necessary for trade, and the uprising at the temple, (c)the prosecution and crucifixion of this person. Every other aspect appears to have been produced by the fictionalization and incorporation of other myths, that like all of judaism, began either in mesopotamia, persia, egypt, or greece. We can document and have the evolution of each of the myths, from the first evidence in anatolia, to the spread throughout the fertile crescent.

The fact that most muslim scholars support the story of mohammed against all historical evidence. The fact that most christian scholars support the story of jesus against the historical evidence. And the fact that most jewish scholars support the existence of each of the characters and events, despite the evidence, tells us nothing. Truth is not determined by democracy, or by opinion, nor by historical authorship, but by evidence that survives falsification of all of the above. Someone named jesus seems to have lived. However, the only evidence we have that does not have origin in other myths and religions, is (a) uprising at the temple, (b) prosecution, (c) crucifiction. EVERYTHING ELSE was intentionally imported from prior religions synthesizing Seneca the Younger’s Stoicism, Greek Neo Platonism (idealism)/Authoritarianism, and Jewish pro roman reformation authors. The origin of the ‘risen after three days’ is most interesting because it actually refers to the morning star which, in the jewish tradition, was not just Horace but Lucifer.

October 9, 2018
The Flip Side of Colonialism
October 9th, 2018 9:31 AM THE FLIP SIDE OF COLONIALISM
1. Colonialism was a profound if not most profound good since the invention of farming – we dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, disease, hard labor, child mortality, early death, suffering, tyranny, and subjectivity to the vicissitudes of nature – kicking and screaming all the while.
2. Slavery was universal and whites were more frequently the subject of it (by muslims) than perpetrators of it. Whites are not malaria-immune but many blacks are. Whites have higher (hotter) metabolisms, and blacks don’t. Whites had to be taken from the criminal class. Africans were captured by other africans as prisoners of war in order to attempt to unify west african empires (which would have happened).
3. Creating middle classes by resource exploitation, and selling manufactured (value added) goods to developing peoples was the only means possible of dragging the vast body of dirty, ignorant, superstitious, violent, poor, disease ridden, un-domesticated human animals out of of their condition, and reforming their societies incrementally until they themselves could create a middle class civilization capable of self governance without threat to more advanced civilizations.
Our failure was only in having the european civil wars and leaving our project incomplete. That failure led to the only significant problem of colonialism: (a) the failure to complete the replacement french despotism with english developmentalism. (b) the absence of the technology of fiat money credit that would have eliminated the need for gold and resource extraction. (c) the collapse left an opening for French Socialism, Jewish Communism, Islamic Fundamentalism. (d) the introduction of medicines and health science without the introduction of eugenics (birth control). (e) the failure of our investments in the third world which generally were too insubstantial to do other than delay or inhibit internal growth of demand. This meant that the warm weather colonies most able to produce high value goods (particularly sugar) with Africans, and therefore (a) had more survivors, (b) spread the genres of previously constrained peoples to new territories, (c) forcibly modernized both cultures, civilizations and Genes. And it was not ‘known’ that enslaved primitives were capable of civilized behavior at the time. It was only in the 19th century after the industrial revolution that we found that citizens were more profitable than serfs, were more profitable than slaves. I don’t ignore anything. I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job to expose and educate the ignorant, unable, sophomoric, and willingly deceptive. ã lol
October 9, 2018
Good Maps of Evolution of Europa and West Asia

October 9th, 2018 3:27 PM GOOD MAPS OF EVOLUTION OF EUROPA AND WEST ASIA

October 9, 2018
Good Maps of Evolution of Europa and West Asia

October 9th, 2018 3:27 PM GOOD MAPS OF EVOLUTION OF EUROPA AND WEST ASIA

October 9, 2018
DEATHS FROM PLAGUE VS WARFARE VS RELIGION VS IDEOLOGY Plague is a disease (Bubon

DEATHS FROM PLAGUE VS WARFARE VS RELIGION VS IDEOLOGY

Plague is a disease (Bubonic Plague) spread by the bacteria Yersinia Pestis originating it what appears Pakistan in less virulent form?, spreading to china, and as usual, becoming virulent in china, and from china via overland and ships to persia, mesopotamia, the Levant, to the black sea, to the bosphorus to europe. The Plague is responsible for almost as many deaths (100-200M). With the Spanish Flu (50M), Small Pox (500M), Tuberculosis (Billions?), Malaria (Many Billions – mostly urban) providing comparisons. Plague deaths at 100-200m, were almost as deadly as deaths caused by islamic fundamentalism(750M) and jewish communism (100M), and european decimation of the native american population (unknown, but conservatively 50M).

Source date (UTC): 2018-10-09 13:27:00 UTC

October 9, 2018
HISTORY IN A NUTSHELL 1 – Indo European Expansion Begins The Great Shift 2 – Mes

HISTORY IN A NUTSHELL

1 – Indo European Expansion Begins The Great Shift

2 – Mesopotamian Empires Evolve Sumer->acadian->assyrian (And Later ->Babylonian) Which Appear To Have Been A Locally Originating Subrace, And Sumerian Neither Semitic Nor Indo-european.)

2 – Hittites(europeans) And Egyptians Exhaust Each Other Fighting Over The Trade Routes.

3 – Assyrians(mesopotamians) Conquer Hittites (And Levant/anatolia)

4 – The Sea Peoples (Europeans) Raid And Defeat All Old World Civs Except Egypt By Collapsing World Trade (But Egypt Never Recovers).

5 – Elam(west Asians)->persians(eastern Indo Europeans) Establish The Achaemenid Empire And Threaten Greece

6 – Greeks Conquer Anatolia To Persia To Egypt. (Macedon) (“Greece” Is Not The Peninsula Alone But The Peninsula And The Lands Around The Aegean, Including The Peloponnese, Islands, And Western Anatolian Coast.

7 – Romans Conquer Greeks. (Rome)

8 – Greeks Re-conquer Romans (Bosphorus-constantinople) By Imposing Middle Eastern Cults And Religio-administrative Rule In The Persian And Egyptian Model.

9 – Seljuks Conquer Arabs, Then Eventually Greeks (Bosphorus -> Balkans And Enter Old Europe)

10 – Germanics (Europeans) Conquer Seljuks, Arabs – The New World, And Asia

11 – Jews And Muslims Stage The Second Reconquest Of Europa: Marxism-socialism-postmodernism-feminism As An Intellectual Valguard, With Muslims Practicing Raiding, Terrorism, And Immigration To The Point Of Failure.

That’s History. Thats History In A Nutshell.

Source date (UTC): 2018-10-09 12:33:00 UTC

October 9, 2018
NO THE BYZANTINES WEREN’T ROMAN AND THE EASTERN ROMAN EMPIRE HAD LITTLE IF NOTHI

NO THE BYZANTINES WEREN’T ROMAN AND THE EASTERN ROMAN EMPIRE HAD LITTLE IF NOTHING TO DO WITH ROME OR EUROPE.

CHRISTIANITY IS JEWISH, SYRIAN, AND GRECO-ANATOLIAN

Ethnically, culturally, organizationally, they were Anatolians and the greek aristocracy (european conquerors) of the athenians and spartans lost. We treat old europe (southeast europe) as european (atlantic+scandinavian + germanic+ celtic+ italic ) but this is just a convention. The balkans were old europe (anatolians), and remain anatolians (I haplogroup), and were not european, or roman, merely a ROMAN CONQUEST of the western Greek Empire.

The holy roman empire was neither holy nor roman. The byzantine empire was neither european or roman, but anatolian/syrian. The balkans and greece today are still Anatolian and Muslim, and poor, and low trust, and corrupt.

The boot of italy is still ethnically anatolian (greek), and that is why italy consists of two countries: germanic north and greek south. There are no Itals any more than there are Etrus, or Hellenes.

There never were romans in Constantinople. There were merely greeks, balkans, anatolians, and syrians that held onto the roman name the way the germans held onto the roman name, and the church held onto the roman name: for status.

Roman Empire was, as all european peoples, a religion of the Hearth and Land (“Heathen”). The jews, syrians, and greco-anatolians manufactured this false religion, and imposed it upon the european peoples in order to destroy the aristocratic recovery of rome after the invasion and the plague – a plague given to the west via byzantium.

1 – INDO EUROPEAN EXPANSION BEGINS THE GREAT SHIFT

2 – MESOPOTAMIAN EMPIRES EVOLVE SUMER->ACADIAN->ASSYRIAN (AND LATER ->BABYLONIAN) which appear to have been a locally originating subrace, and Sumerian neither semitic nor indo-european.)

2 – HITTITES(EUROPEANS) AND EGYPTIANS EXHAUST EACH OTHER FIGHTING OVER THE TRADE ROUTES.

3 – ASSYRIANS(MESOPOTAMIANS) CONQUER HITTITES (AND LEVANT/ANATOLIA)

4 – THE SEA PEOPLES (EUROPEANS) RAID AND DEFEAT ALL OLD WORLD CIVS EXCEPT EGYPT BY COLLAPSING WORLD TRADE (but egypt never recovers).

5 – ELAM(West Asians)->PERSIANS(EASTERN INDO EUROPEANS) ESTABLISH THE ACHAEMENID EMPIRE AND THREATEN GREECE

6 – GREEKS CONQUER ANATOLIA TO PERSIA TO EGYPT. (Macedon) (“Greece” is not the peninsula alone but the peninsula and the lands around the aegean, including the peloponnese, islands, and western anatolian coast.

7 – ROMANS CONQUER GREEKS. (Rome)

8 – GREEKS RE-CONQUER ROMANS (Bosphorus-Constantinople) by imposing middle eastern cults and religio-administrative rule in the Persian and Egyptian model.

9 – SELJUKS CONQUER ARABS, THEN EVENTUALLY GREEKS (Bosphorus -> Balkans and enter old europe)

10 – GERMANICS (Europeans) CONQUER SELJUKS, ARABS – THE NEW WORLD, AND ASIA

11 – JEWS AND MUSLIMS STAGE THE SECOND RECONQUEST OF EUROPA: MARXISM-SOCIALISM-POSTMODERNISM-FEMINISM AS AN INTELLECTUAL VANGUARD, WITH MUSLIMS PRACTICING RAIDING, TERRORISM, AND IMMIGRATION TO THE POINT OF FAILURE.

THAT’S HISTORY. THATS HISTORY IN A NUTSHELL.

Source date (UTC): 2018-10-09 12:17:00 UTC

October 9, 2018
THE FLIP SIDE OF COLONIALISM 1. Colonialism was a profound if not most profound

THE FLIP SIDE OF COLONIALISM

1. Colonialism was a profound if not most profound good since the invention of farming – we dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, disease, hard labor, child mortality, early death, suffering, tyranny, and subjectivity to the vicissitudes of nature – kicking and screaming all the while.

Our failure was only in having the european civil wars and leaving our project incomplete. That failure led to the only significant problem of colonialism: (a) the failure to complete the replacement french despotism with english developmentalism. (b) the absence of the technology of fiat money credit that would have eliminated the need for gold and resource extraction. (c) the collapse left an opening for French Socialism, Jewish Communism, Islamic Fundamentalism. (d) the introduction of medicines and health science without the introduction of eugenics (birth control). (e) the failure of our investments in the third world which generally were too insubstantial to do other than delay or inhibit internal growth of demand.

2. Slavery was universal and whites were more frequently the subject of it (by muslims) than perpetrators of it. Whites are not malaria-immune but many blacks are. Whites have higher (hotter) metabolisms, and blacks don’t. Whites had to be taken from the criminal class. Africans were captured by other africans as prisoners of war in order to attempt to unify west african empires (which would have happened).

This meant that the warm weather colonies most able to produce high value goods (particularly sugar) with Africans, and therefore (a) had more survivors, (b) spread the genres of previously constrained peoples to new territories, (c) forcibly modernized both cultures, civilizations and Genes. And it was not ‘known’ that enslaved primitives were capable of civilized behavior at the time. It was only in the 19th century after the industrial revolution that we found that citizens were more profitable than serfs, were more profitable than slaves.

3. Creating middle classes by resource exploitation, and selling manufactured (value added) goods to developing peoples was the only means possible of dragging the vast body of dirty, ignorant, superstitious, violent, poor, disease ridden, un-domesticated human animals out of of their condition, and reforming their societies incrementally until they themselves could create a middle class civilization capable of self governance without threat to more advanced civilizations.

I don’t ignore anything. I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job to expose and educate the ignorant, unable, sophomoric, and willingly deceptive. 　 lol

Source date (UTC): 2018-10-09 09:31:00 UTC

October 9, 2018