The only people that learn anything from genetic testing are those whose ancestors didn’t learn.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-26 19:40:00 UTC
The only people that learn anything from genetic testing are those whose ancestors didn’t learn.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-26 19:40:00 UTC
WHY SEPARATE AND INSULATE?
Because we have three advantages to preserve as a group:
1. A Demographic Advantage: far smaller lower class dead weight.
2. A Genetic Advantage: Neoteny. Agency. Beauty. Creativity
3. And a Cultural Advantage: Heroism/Excellence, Sovereignty/Reciprocity, Truth before face/Duty before Family, Rule of Law/Jury, Markets in everything.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-25 15:33:00 UTC
The Frankfurt School’s Critical Theory is just GRSM to undermine western civilization.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-25 00:47:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099833308786102272
The Frankfurt School’s Critical Theory is just GRSM to undermine western civilization.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 19:47:00 UTC
—“Westerners evolved from scarcity and low opportunity, trough a feedback system of effort-related opportunity where cognitive empathy evolved to accommodate the potential of exhaustive tit-for-tat. Affective empathy is just entropy under homogeneity and persistent norms and institutions (hence, Scandinavia).”—Simon Ström
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 15:12:00 UTC
The Generations of European Thought:
Gen1: Heathen
(ancestral, seasons, nature)
(ALL)
Gen2: Aryan
(exhaustive heroism and excellence)
(UPPER)
Gen3: Aristotelian
(exhaustive naturalism, science, law)
(MIDDLE)
Gen4: Christian
(exhaustive forgiveness and charity)
(LOWER)
I would be Aryan, Aristotelian, Heathen, Christian in my priorities.
Kind of wonder what other priorities others feel.
HEATHEN …………………….CHRISTIAN
|………………………………………………….|
|………………………………………………….|
|………………………………………………….|
|………………………………………………….|
ARYAN…………………….ARISTOTELIAN
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 14:10:00 UTC
I wish I could capture into words the world view when this song was written compared to the world view today.
—“
There is no pain you are receding
A distant ship’s smoke on the horizon
You are only coming through in waves
Your lips move but I can’t hear what you’re saying
“–
We lived in a civilizational luxury, at the cost of continuous civilizational warfare. We were dragging mankind out of the dark. But in doing it paid too high a price.
The collapse of communism was good for mankind.
The collapse of the russian empire, rather than its conversion into a conservative version of european civilization on the eastern european model is the great catastrophe of the second half of the twentieth century.
If you had told me that a decade ago I would have disagreed.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 13:18:00 UTC
(from elsewhere)
—…it is very hard for much of the world, and in particular the muslim world, to grasp the function of ‘heroism’ and ‘truth before face’. It is contra-ethical to their intuition. It is however what makes us adapt and innovate thru continuous competition – and them not.—CD
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 12:55:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle
This is true. IMHO india was abused as were all colonies.
That said, (a) india had one of the earliest advanced civilizations. (b) did not withstand the IE expansion, nor the muslim expansion, (c) did not wall herself off like the chinese, (d) were not able to produce a strong enough central government to do any of the above.
Why? because whatever the reason – it remains india’s problem today.
The more i understand it, (other than the ‘filth’ and irresponsibility for the commons), Indian thought, history, culture, religion is envious, but progression from poverty slow despite it. Why?
REGARDING WESTERN CIV
It is not european colonization that helped the world, but colonization and the profits therefrom that funded western IDEAS that helped the world – both in the ancient world and in the modern. And it was the Semitic Dark Ages that did the opposite: spread ignorance, poverty, and dysgenia.
And it’s still happening.
We all need to practice natinoalism and end this fking terrorism of each other under the banners of ideology and religion.
THERE IS ONLY ONE LAW of human cooperation and that is Reciprocity at every level, personal, familial, tribal, and national. Every other action is parasitic. And if one must be a parasite to survive, then others must prosecute them in self defense.
One has no right to religion that circumvents this law. And if one must practice a religion counter to this law, then one’s actions are parasitic. And they must be prosecuted in self defense.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 12:02:00 UTC
ANSWERING A COMMON CRITICISM OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION
—“Whenever I read something like “disproportionate success of western civilization in the ancient” I think of the cult of Dionysus and their ritualized cannibalism, the Athenians and their practice of choosing -by popular vote! – a human “scapegoat” for their collective sins to banish to certain death, the fact that the Romans only *rarely* performed human sacrifice in situations like the wars with the Carthaginians, the fact that one of the most revered figures from the Ancient Greek philosophical tradition was a man – Diogenes – who masturbated in public and slept in a barrel, that the Spartans used to leave infants to die in the wild of exposure if they weren’t deemed “fit” as future soldiers, that Plato was a proponent of – in his “The Republic” – a totalitarian dystopia as the ideal society, that pederasty was considered a good thing by many of their “greatest” thinkers, and that they – Romans – then deteriorated into a state where the main public pastime was watching slaves murder each other and be eaten alive by animals, it makes me wonder how this could possibly be considered a success.”—-Abu Ayoub
Someone on my management team defended me once by saying
—-“Curt fails like the rest of us, the difference is we do a few things and some fail, he does ten thousand things, and some fail.”—
I do not confuse perfect with THE BEST.
Meanwhile most civilizations cannot produce anything resembling a western commons or polity, because they cannot cull or rule the underclasses, cannot produce a competitive aristocracy, cannot produce truth, trust, commons, defense of commons, and break the limits of family, clan, and tribe to produce goods. Only japanese and Koreans.
They applied truth, they created naturalism and reason culminating in roman law, and by archimedes were on the verge of the industrial revolution in just a few hundred years – and we dragged mankind out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, early death, and vicisitudes of nature. Why?
They preserve competition in all walks of life, and deem it heroic.
All the great civilizations of the ancient world are lost but east asia. Europe was rebuilt itself from the north. Harappan didn’t make it, but did it’s best from the east. And Judaism, christianity, and islam are a cancer that destroys all before it by reversing eugenic progress.
The secret to success for a people is shrinking the lower classes until the middle classes are productive enough to carry what remains, without constant decline. the problem is it is preferable for rulers to keep people poor can concentrate wealth – everywhere except for far east and far west.
China had Reason-lite and order before face but face before truth, the west had Reason, and truth before all and markets. With christianity as the cancer that we are still (some of us) struggling to escape. Africa, the pacific, and america had too little time. The middle east over extended and islam destroyed all the great civilizations as a cancer of uncontrolled underclass growth. ANd we simply see this in the data.
That said, your criticisms are legit. they are just immaterial in relation to the successes.
If you were ruled, were you better off under any rule than you are under western? There is no comparison of rule between civilizations even between chinese rule and western rule.
The the greatest mistake my people made was expanding aristocratic egalitarianism (aristocracy of everyone) beyond the possible. The second greatest mistake my people made was the white man’s burden. It is true. But we should never have tried to carry that burden. The third greatest mistake my people made was trying to preserve the ‘market’ of the balance of powers, rather than letting the russians retake constantinople, and the germans eastern europe. The fourth greatest mistake my people made was the sequence of falure to return the slaves to africa, liberating our ancient enemy the jews, not prosecuting the communists with an inquisition, and the postwar immigration act – these are christian errors.
All of these are the same mistake – optimism about mankind – and virtue signaling.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 09:37:00 UTC