Curt Doolittle

Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • population density is only an asset as long as there is sufficient food, water,

    population density is only an asset as long as there is sufficient food, water, and power to sustain it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 20:24:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1109913996168032256

  • US population density is only an asset as long as there is sufficient food, wate

    US population density is only an asset as long as there is sufficient food, water, and power to sustain it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 16:24:00 UTC

  • Crowns are for the valiant — sceptres for the bold! Throne and power for mighty

    Crowns are for the valiant — sceptres for the bold!

    Throne and power for mighty men who dare to take and hold.

    Gold is for the mistress — silver for the maid —

    Copper for the craftsman cunning at his trade.

    Tears are for the craven, prayers are for the clown —

    Halters for the silly neck that cannot keep a crown.

    Wounds are for the desperate, blows are for the strong.

    Balm and oil for weary hearts all cut and bruised with wrong.

    Good! said the Baron sitting in his hall,

    For Iron — Cold Iron — is master of them all.

    by Kipling.

    (Edited for clarity. 😉 )

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 15:12:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54798309_10157069765892264_257868599

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54798309_10157069765892264_2578685990717620224_o_10157069765882264.jpg by Michael AbbottSvan HerulBut then you look at the people that cultivated all that into the left….and they are a majority of a certain race….Mar 26, 2019, 3:56 AMby Michael Abbott

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 11:56:00 UTC

  • IN CASE YOU MISSED IT … FRAMES OF PEOPLES (important) (read this) Continental

    IN CASE YOU MISSED IT … FRAMES OF PEOPLES

    (important) (read this)

    Continental vs Scandinavian vs Anglo thought, (vs Latin and Orthodox thought for that matter).

    —“It’s just been a challenge suggesting to [Curt] that declarative constructs are not how morality is actually processed.”–Josh Jeppson

    It’s not how it’s processed. I agree. Its however how it is CALCULATED.

    (a) this is forever going to be a debate between occult semitic supernatural, the continental(german) phenomenalistic and the scientific (scandinavian) anglo, and as far as I know tells us nothing other than the amount of time under semitic (church) influence (rule) and the demand for obedience between island (scandinavian/athenian naval security), and territorial (germanic/spartan army vulnerability), or the imperial (Roman Anglo/Germanic-American power confidence)

    (b) So the *demand* for Scientific Rules of Dispute resolution (American), Conformity of Values(Scandinavian), and Conformity of Thought value and deed (German), is determined by the environment for certain. By habituation (tradition) over time out of consequence. By genetics over longer time by rates of reproduction and eugenic suppression.

    (c) And while we EVOLVE a system to satisfy that demand (cheap law of engineering, more expensive law of norms, and very expensive law of thought word and deed), the system of rules one implements need not be limited to the means under which it evolved, any more than reason, measurement (math) and science (testimony) need be limited to those who evolved it.

    (d) My understanding is that one writes law (science) by calculation, one teaches norms (public experience) by imitation of rules, and one indoctrinates into thoughts (education) by parable. ie: Specific Formulae, General Rules, Loose Parables.

    (e) we develop ‘values’ in response to internal trust and external security. These are adaptations. A russian, a Pole, an Italian, a Frenchman, a German, a Dane, an Anglo, an Australian, and an American develop values suited to our condition. However, we assumed these are CHOSEN, and we assume their method of communication must be non-rational. Neither is true.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 11:36:00 UTC

  • by Nick Heywood Society is a result of Similar DNA selecting each other for trus

    by Nick Heywood

    Society is a result of Similar DNA selecting each other for trust and likelihood of lessor cost reciprocity and productive cooperation than otherwise!

    In other words?…. How likely is it that you, assuming you’re from a similar gene pool, are or will…

    a. Advise me to act on falsehoods?

    b. advise me to act on falsehoods you know to be false (Lie!)?

    c. exchange resources as a result (with no warranty) (rip me off)?

    d. just take my S (Theft)?

    e. initiate violence if I refuse (Attempt to kill me)?

    f. Complete or honour agreements?

    g. Agree to 3rd party, empirical (Scientific method and competent authority) judgement in the event of dispute?

    h. our reciprocity and/or cooperation results in productivity improvements for you and I?

    Compared to an unfamiliar, unknown, unsampled (blind faith) gene pool?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-23 09:02:00 UTC

  • Ths was before communism and socialism fell. That’s why it’s from 1968. Back in

    Ths was before communism and socialism fell. That’s why it’s from 1968. Back in that era we were still in the postwar economic boom. It ended with the oil crisis in 73. The rest of the boom ended with the entry of china and india into the world market. IT”S NOT POSSIBLE. SORRY.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-23 01:20:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1109263637636673536

    Reply addressees: @614YangGang

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106756742241796096

    IN REPLY TO:

    @614YangGang

    The letter often referenced by Andrew
    Yang, which was signed by over 1,000
    economists urging Congress to adopt
    Universal Basic Income in 1968. #YangGang https://t.co/7nxkj9kM1h

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106756742241796096

  • “Blood not mud”

    “Blood not mud”

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-22 09:32:00 UTC

  • RT @HeraclitusBot: Fragment 44. Contribute at #HeraclitusFragments

    RT @HeraclitusBot: Fragment 44.
    Contribute at https://github.com/r03ert0/Heraclitus-Fragments
    #HeraclitusFragments https://t.co/j4HqvdTqkZ

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-21 23:36:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108874985060397056

  • HOW WE DESTROY OUR CIVIL SOCIETY by Curt Doolittle As someone who has gone from

    HOW WE DESTROY OUR CIVIL SOCIETY

    by Curt Doolittle

    As someone who has gone from middle class to 1%’er and retired in his 40’s, money was absolutely no use to me OTHER than signal value.

    For people with limited ability, money reduces stress. For those of us with ability it does nothing. I have seen no evidence to date that anything over median + 20% produces increased happiness. All we do is purchase cars, homes, and vacations with greater signal value.

    The primary value of money is (UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH WARNING:) to separate yourself from people you don’t want to be around – because we have no right of voluntary disassociation.

    This is, in my opinion, the primary problem of multiculturalism: it is not possible to separate EXCEPT by economic cost, which means we abandon the middle, lower middle, working, and laboring classes to association with undesirables.

    In other words, we cannot judge people by their character and therefore admit them to schools, neighborhoods and businesses (or politics) but we simply put economic sorting in place which because of immigration destroys our middle and working classes. Involuntary Association Is Not A Market Action nor is it commensurable with the Natural Law of Reciprocity. Nor peaceful harmonious coexistence.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-21 10:39:00 UTC