Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • (FB 1552159422 Timestamp) Indic languages Indic languages are a major language f

    (FB 1552159422 Timestamp) Indic languages Indic languages are a major language family of the Indian subcontinent. They constitute a branch of the Indo-Iranian languages, itself a branch of the Indo-European language family. In the early 21st century, Indo-Aryan languages were spoken by more than 800 million people, primarily in India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.[2] Moreover, there are large immigrant and/or expatriate Indo-Aryan speaking communities in northwestern Europe, Western Asia, North America and Australia. There are about 219 known Indo-Aryan languages. [3] The largest in terms of speakers are Hindustani (Hindi-Urdu, about 329 million),[4] Bengali (242 million),[5] Punjabi (about 100 million),[6] and other languages, with a 2005 estimate placing the total number of native speakers at nearly 900 million.[7]

  • (FB 1552159318 Timestamp) Uralic languages Uralic languages, family of more than

    (FB 1552159318 Timestamp) Uralic languages Uralic languages, family of more than 20 related languages, all descended from a Proto-Uralic language that existed 7,000 to 10,000 years ago. At its earliest stages, Uralic most probably included the ancestors of the Yukaghir language. The Uralic languages are spoken by more than 25 million people scattered throughout northeastern Europe, northern Asia, and (through immigration) North America. The most demographically important Uralic language is Hungarian, the official language of Hungary. Two other Uralic languages, Estonian (the official language of Estonia) and Finnish (one of two national languages of Finland—the other is Swedish, a Germanic language), are also spoken by millions. Attempts to trace the genealogy of the Uralic languages to periods earlier than Proto-Uralic have been hampered by the great changes in the attested languages, which preserve relatively few features and therefore provide little evidence upon which scholars may base meaningful claims for a more distant relationship. Most commonly mentioned in this respect is a putative connection with the Altaic language family (including Turkic and Mongolian). This hypothetical language group, called Ural-Altaic, is not considered by most scholars to be soundly based. Although the Uralic and Indo-European languages are not generally thought to be related, more speculative studies have suggested a connection between them. Relationship with the Eskimo languages, Dravidian (e.g., Telugu), Japanese, Korean, and various American Indian groups has also been proposed. The most radical of these claims is the massive Dené-Finnish grouping of Morris Swadesh, which encompasses, among others, Sino-Tibetan (e.g., Chinese) and Athabaskan (e.g., Navajo). The Uralic language family in its current status consists of two related groups of languages, the Finno-Ugric and the Samoyedic, both of which developed from a common ancestor, called Proto-Uralic, that was spoken 7,000 to 10,000 years ago in the general area of the north-central Ural Mountains. At its very earliest stages Uralic most probably included the ancestors of the Yukaghir languages (formerly listed as a Paleo-Siberian stock with no known relatives). Over the millennia, both Finno-Ugric and Samoyedic branches of Uralic have given rise to more or less divergent subgroups of languages, which nonetheless have retained certain traits from their common source. For example, the degree of similarity between two of the least closely related members of the Finno-Ugric group, Hungarian and Finnish, is comparable to that between English and Russian (which belong to the Indo-European family of languages). The difference between any Finno-Ugric language and any Samoyedic tongue would be even greater. On the other hand, more closely related members of Finno-Ugric, such as Finnish and Estonian, differ in much the same manner as greatly diverse dialects of the same language.

  • (FB 1552159139 Timestamp) Altaic languages Altaic is a hypothetical language fam

    (FB 1552159139 Timestamp) Altaic languages Altaic is a hypothetical language family of central Eurasia and Siberia first proposed in the 18th century, but whose existence is widely discredited among comparative linguists. The Turkic, Mongolic and Tungusic groups are invariably included in the family; some authors added Koreanic and the Japonic languages. The latter expanded grouping came to be known as “Macro-Altaic”, leading to the designation of the smaller former grouping as “Micro-Altaic” by retronymy. Most proponents of Altaic continue to support the inclusion of Korean. These languages are spoken in a wide arc stretching from Eastern Europe through Anatolia and eastern Caucasus through North Asia and Central Asia to the Korean Peninsula and Japanese archipelago in East Asia. The group is named after the Altai mountain range in the center of Asia.

  • (FB 1552158788 Timestamp) ANOTHER TAKE ON THE IE EXPANSION Stage 1: “ORIGINATION

    (FB 1552158788 Timestamp) ANOTHER TAKE ON THE IE EXPANSION Stage 1: “ORIGINATION” Some pre-IE languages are also indicated:

    • Vasconic is tentatively associated here with Neolithic languages of Thessalian origin (my main working hypothesis). It would at the time be the largest European language family therefore.
      • Uralic should be right north of the early Indoeuropeans, what explains their ancestral Sprachbund.
      • Pelasgian indicates the language of Vinca-Dimini (Grey Ware), which was a limited intrusion c. 5000 BCE with origins related to Tell Halaf most likely.

    Stage 2: “EXPANSION” The main outline of the Indo-european expansion. Some other cultures and languages are indicated in gray colors for context. At this point we should have the seeds of: – Anatolian (Maykop) – Tocharian (Afanasevo, in Altai) – Indo-Iranian (Yamna) – Western Indo-european (Baalberge): a large subfamily that would give birth to Balto-Slavic, Germanic, Celtic and Italic. – Possible seeds of Tracian, Greek, etc. in the Balcanic Kurgans, an ill-defined group that would nevertheless plunder and radically alter the ethnic geography of the Eastern Balcans (see next map). Stage 3: “CONSOLIDATION” Some notes:

    • The Anatolian branch goes into Asia with the Kura-Araxes culture.
    • The Eastern Balcans are divided between two cultures:




        • Cotofeni, more purely Kurgan and a candidate for Greek origins


        • Ezero, rather Dniepr-Don (→ Sredny-Stog II) cultural inheritance. Surely proto-Thracians and hence a candidate for the origin of Armenian (via Phrygians).
    • Expansion of Yamna (proto-Indo-Iranians) and therefore liquidation of Dniepr-Don Neolithic

    • Consolidation and first expansion of the Western IE branch (Globular Amphorae). It may be important to note that in the Baalberge→→→Globular Amphorae period, this Kurgan culture experimented various influences that may be considered Vasconic: the Danubian substrate, the powerful southern Danubian culture of Baden and the Northernly Funnelbeaker influence, associated to Atlantic Megalithism.

    Stage 4: “COMPLETION” Setting the proto-historical scenario with some further expansions. Most notably:

    • Corded Ware: a major expansion of the Western IE group to the West, East and North.
    • Vucedol: probably associated with the previous, eradicates the Danubian culture in their homeland (only Foltesti in Moldavia would survive for some more time within this important Neolithic macro-culture). Vucedol would be another candidate for Greek origins for their use of the architectural concept of megaron.

    • Catacombs culture’s origins are debated but it’s clearly Kurgan in any case.

    • Poltavka represents continuity with the seed of the Kurgan/Indoeuropean phenomenon and its later evolution leads directly to Indo-Iranians.

    It should be noted that, synchronously with the Corded Ware expansion, the Megalithic bowmen of Artenac culture expanded from Dordogne, subsuming the last Western Danubian groups all the way to Belgium. This culture was probably proto-Aquitanian. A whole millennium of stability followed at the new Rhine border, crossed only by the likely traders of the Bell Beaker phenomenon. Source: http://forwhattheywereweare.blogspot.com/p/blog-page.html

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1552163856 Timestamp) SEE THE PATTERN? Phoenician > Delian > Hanseatic > Atlantic? The Naval Trading Civilizations. VS The four great (Successful) river civilizations. VS The (Difficult) Land Empires. VS The (Failed) Horse Empires Germany would have completed our evolution as europeans if not for the discovery of the new world. France died with her revolution and England divorced from europe with her empire, and germany was restoring its historical trajectory as the heart of european civilization and culture. We must do everything possible to (a) reunite the anglo empire, (b) restore the continental alliance, (c) build out the intermarium alliance, and (d) rebuild the russian empire so she is economically defensible from south and east.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1552582128 Timestamp) i love russians. idiot playing music too loud in the apartment building. girl knocks on door. asks politely. idiot talks smack. man comes from behind girl. beats idiot for ten minutes to within an inch of his life. All the while lecturing him on his behavior. stops. then hangs around until idiot recovers. this is paternalism. This is what we have lost. Paternalism. Responsibility.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1552582128 Timestamp) i love russians. idiot playing music too loud in the apartment building. girl knocks on door. asks politely. idiot talks smack. man comes from behind girl. beats idiot for ten minutes to within an inch of his life. All the while lecturing him on his behavior. stops. then hangs around until idiot recovers. this is paternalism. This is what we have lost. Paternalism. Responsibility.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1552657214 Timestamp) The boomers were ((())) seduced and they are the ‘sucker’ generation. The postwar heroic myth did them in.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1552610485 Timestamp) Leucippus -> Democritus -> Aristotle

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1552610048 Timestamp) DIOGENES -> CRATES -> ZENO -> STOICISM —“Diogenes was captured by pirates and sold into slavery, eventually settling in Corinth. There he passed his philosophy of Cynicism to Crates, who taught it to Zeno of Citium, who fashioned it into the school of Stoicism, one of the most enduring schools of Greek philosophy. None of Diogenes’ writings have survived, but there are some details of his life from anecdotes (chreia), especially from Diogenes Laërtius’ book Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers and some other sources.”—