Curt Doolittle

Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550938699 Timestamp) REPEATING – I DON’T HATE ON PEOPLE – THE JQ ANSWERED. (core) Someone just suggested I reiterate. I don’t do hate on people, but on ideas. (Although I do a lot of anger and frustration, because I don’t suffer fools, sophists, supernaturalists, or the intellectually dishonest.)

    1. Propertarianism is a social science written in the grammars of law and economics. The product of that work is universal like all sciences. Any people can use it. It is easier for our people to use it because we have higher trust, lower corruption, and more experience under empirical truth and rule of law, because we have been a middle class or middle class organized polity for longer than all other peoples.

    2. I view the Ashkenazim as ‘ours’ – genetically they are half ours, and we’ve “bought and paid for their inclusion” in our polity so to speak over the centuries – at the costs of tens of millions of lives, vast abuse by extreme usury, undermining of every one of our nations, and cultures, and much of our great civil wars.

    3. But I view their problem as ours – our failure to adapt the law to prohibit parasitism upon the commons, false promise and baiting in to moral hazard, and the use of pilpul and critique, including the defense of all of the above by GSRRM.

    4. I view the problem of this kind behavior as relatively easily solved by law – law which I have produced, by accident really, as a byproduct of attempting to explain our own group strategy in scientific terms.

    5. I view the ending of the malincentives of the industries in which they employ false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul, critique, and GSRRM resulting in continuous undermining of our civlization as relatively easy – using the law I have produced.

    6. I view restoring our high trust society, the civil society, the family, and the market between men and women, definancializing our society, depoliticizing it, de-programming it, cleaning the academy, the media, the government, and business, finance, economics, and law, of this behavior relatively easy – using the law I have produced.

    I DON’T AVOID THE QUESTION – I SHOW YOU THE MIRROR So, I don’t avoid the JQ. I explain it. I answer it. I say how to productively solve it. And I do it without hating on anything except our traditional differences in group competition that like all differences must be ameliorated by incremental suppression of novel means of parasitism, by the incremental evolution of the common law of tort. IS THIS A CIVNAT POSITION? Well, I write LAW. Whatever government you want to produce, whether nationalist, civic nationalist, or globalist, and no matter what economic model you may want to produce, you can do it with P-LAW as long as you do it truthfully and transparently, without fictionalisms, lying, and GSRRM. So it’s an ethno nationalist, civic nationalist, or globalist position. WHAT ABOUT ETHNOCENTRISM? My position is scientific: (a) ethnocentrism is always and everywhere the optimum group strategy, (b) it is the optimum international order always and everywhere (c) scale is only valuable for (i) suicide by debt expansion, (ii) use of suicide by debt expansion in the production of industrial (Gen 2 and Gen 3) warfare, in an age where hand to hand, and rifle, and mechanized infantry, have been replaced by supersonic autonomous nuclear weaponry – all but eliminating the utility of population and scale from the equation. WHAT’S MY PERSONAL OPINION? If you want my opinion (i) we are (at least our productive classes) incompatible with peoples who have practiced less self domestication (lower class size reduction, and neotonic evolution) without tragic cost to our future, to ourselves, and to our ancestors (ii) I ‘demand’ ethnocentric polity and (ii) no people or group of people have the right to deny it without conducting genocide, for which genocide is the only possible reciprocity. (iiii) I am willing to demand restitution for past and present lifetime crimes by those that attempt to make that decision for me and mine. PRODUCE INCENTIVES BY LAW – THE REST WILL FOLLOW. There are no other people other than east asians that are sufficiently compatible with us because they are the only other people more self-domesticated than we are. And there is no need for population, particularly underclass population, in an era where labor is no longer competitive in the international market therefore producing a deadweight cost burden on us for eternity. YOU DON”T NEED TO “BELIEVE” THE LAW People don’t have to believe in or agree with the Law. They just need to avoid it. They don’t need to be trained. Or educated. Incentives ripple through the economy and polity almost instantaneously. All that is required is incentive to report violations, and any violation of reciprocity that exposes anyone to risk provides incentive.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550932044 Timestamp) STUDY SPAIN TO UNDERSTAND FASCISM —“If you want to understand the history of fascist versus communist struggles of the interwar period between WW1 and WW2—study the story of Spain, and especially the work of Stanley Payne…and to understand the deep historical processes that led to the conflict between Fascists and Communists (and the various sub-factions of each side) in Spain dating back to the 1700s, check out this work….”—Nick

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550932044 Timestamp) STUDY SPAIN TO UNDERSTAND FASCISM —“If you want to understand the history of fascist versus communist struggles of the interwar period between WW1 and WW2—study the story of Spain, and especially the work of Stanley Payne…and to understand the deep historical processes that led to the conflict between Fascists and Communists (and the various sub-factions of each side) in Spain dating back to the 1700s, check out this work….”—Nick

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551027721 Timestamp) Curt Doolittle This is true. IMHO india was abused as were all colonies. That said, (a) india had one of the earliest advanced civilizations. (b) did not withstand the IE expansion, nor the muslim expansion, (c) did not wall herself off like the chinese, (d) were not able to produce a strong enough central government to do any of the above. Why? because whatever the reason – it remains india’s problem today. The more i understand it, (other than the ‘filth’ and irresponsibility for the commons), Indian thought, history, culture, religion is envious, but progression from poverty slow despite it. Why? REGARDING WESTERN CIV It is not european colonization that helped the world, but colonization and the profits therefrom that funded western IDEAS that helped the world – both in the ancient world and in the modern. And it was the Semitic Dark Ages that did the opposite: spread ignorance, poverty, and dysgenia. And it’s still happening. We all need to practice natinoalism and end this fking terrorism of each other under the banners of ideology and religion. THERE IS ONLY ONE LAW of human cooperation and that is Reciprocity at every level, personal, familial, tribal, and national. Every other action is parasitic. And if one must be a parasite to survive, then others must prosecute them in self defense. One has no right to religion that circumvents this law. And if one must practice a religion counter to this law, then one’s actions are parasitic. And they must be prosecuted in self defense.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551032329 Timestamp) I wish I could capture into words the world view when this song was written compared to the world view today. —” There is no pain you are receding A distant ship’s smoke on the horizon You are only coming through in waves Your lips move but I can’t hear what you’re saying “– We lived in a civilizational luxury, at the cost of continuous civilizational warfare. We were dragging mankind out of the dark. But in doing it paid too high a price. The collapse of communism was good for mankind. The collapse of the russian empire, rather than its conversion into a conservative version of european civilization on the eastern european model is the great catastrophe of the second half of the twentieth century. If you had told me that a decade ago I would have disagreed.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551019651 Timestamp) FILLING MARKET DEMAND —“Curt: I think one reason you are refreshing is that you are an example of older WASP masculinity. We are taught from a young age that to be masculine “cool”, assertive, that we must adopt the identity or manner of Irish or Italians [bravado] to be masculine white men. And most who are not WASPs implicitly support this, as it lowers our SMV relative to theirs, to have a large segment of their competition deemed stiff, uncool and out of style.”— G.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551027721 Timestamp) Curt Doolittle This is true. IMHO india was abused as were all colonies. That said, (a) india had one of the earliest advanced civilizations. (b) did not withstand the IE expansion, nor the muslim expansion, (c) did not wall herself off like the chinese, (d) were not able to produce a strong enough central government to do any of the above. Why? because whatever the reason – it remains india’s problem today. The more i understand it, (other than the ‘filth’ and irresponsibility for the commons), Indian thought, history, culture, religion is envious, but progression from poverty slow despite it. Why? REGARDING WESTERN CIV It is not european colonization that helped the world, but colonization and the profits therefrom that funded western IDEAS that helped the world – both in the ancient world and in the modern. And it was the Semitic Dark Ages that did the opposite: spread ignorance, poverty, and dysgenia. And it’s still happening. We all need to practice natinoalism and end this fking terrorism of each other under the banners of ideology and religion. THERE IS ONLY ONE LAW of human cooperation and that is Reciprocity at every level, personal, familial, tribal, and national. Every other action is parasitic. And if one must be a parasite to survive, then others must prosecute them in self defense. One has no right to religion that circumvents this law. And if one must practice a religion counter to this law, then one’s actions are parasitic. And they must be prosecuted in self defense.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551019022 Timestamp) ANSWERING A COMMON CRITICISM OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION —“Whenever I read something like “disproportionate success of western civilization in the ancient” I think of the cult of Dionysus and their ritualized cannibalism, the Athenians and their practice of choosing -by popular vote! – a human “scapegoat” for their collective sins to banish to certain death, the fact that the Romans only rarely performed human sacrifice in situations like the wars with the Carthaginians, the fact that one of the most revered figures from the Ancient Greek philosophical tradition was a man – Diogenes – who masturbated in public and slept in a barrel, that the Spartans used to leave infants to die in the wild of exposure if they weren’t deemed “fit” as future soldiers, that Plato was a proponent of – in his “The Republic” – a totalitarian dystopia as the ideal society, that pederasty was considered a good thing by many of their “greatest” thinkers, and that they – Romans – then deteriorated into a state where the main public pastime was watching slaves murder each other and be eaten alive by animals, it makes me wonder how this could possibly be considered a success.”—-Abu Ayoub Someone on my management team defended me once by saying —-“Curt fails like the rest of us, the difference is we do a few things and some fail, he does ten thousand things, and some fail.”— I do not confuse perfect with THE BEST. Meanwhile most civilizations cannot produce anything resembling a western commons or polity, because they cannot cull or rule the underclasses, cannot produce a competitive aristocracy, cannot produce truth, trust, commons, defense of commons, and break the limits of family, clan, and tribe to produce goods. Only japanese and Koreans. They applied truth, they created naturalism and reason culminating in roman law, and by archimedes were on the verge of the industrial revolution in just a few hundred years – and we dragged mankind out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, early death, and vicisitudes of nature. Why? They preserve competition in all walks of life, and deem it heroic. All the great civilizations of the ancient world are lost but east asia. Europe was rebuilt itself from the north. Harappan didn’t make it, but did it’s best from the east. And Judaism, christianity, and islam are a cancer that destroys all before it by reversing eugenic progress. The secret to success for a people is shrinking the lower classes until the middle classes are productive enough to carry what remains, without constant decline. the problem is it is preferable for rulers to keep people poor can concentrate wealth – everywhere except for far east and far west. China had Reason-lite and order before face but face before truth, the west had Reason, and truth before all and markets. With christianity as the cancer that we are still (some of us) struggling to escape. Africa, the pacific, and america had too little time. The middle east over extended and islam destroyed all the great civilizations as a cancer of uncontrolled underclass growth. ANd we simply see this in the data. That said, your criticisms are legit. they are just immaterial in relation to the successes. If you were ruled, were you better off under any rule than you are under western? There is no comparison of rule between civilizations even between chinese rule and western rule. The the greatest mistake my people made was expanding aristocratic egalitarianism (aristocracy of everyone) beyond the possible. The second greatest mistake my people made was the white man’s burden. It is true. But we should never have tried to carry that burden. The third greatest mistake my people made was trying to preserve the ‘market’ of the balance of powers, rather than letting the russians retake constantinople, and the germans eastern europe. The fourth greatest mistake my people made was the sequence of falure to return the slaves to africa, liberating our ancient enemy the jews, not prosecuting the communists with an inquisition, and the postwar immigration act – these are christian errors. All of these are the same mistake – optimism about mankind – and virtue signaling.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551019022 Timestamp) ANSWERING A COMMON CRITICISM OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION —“Whenever I read something like “disproportionate success of western civilization in the ancient” I think of the cult of Dionysus and their ritualized cannibalism, the Athenians and their practice of choosing -by popular vote! – a human “scapegoat” for their collective sins to banish to certain death, the fact that the Romans only rarely performed human sacrifice in situations like the wars with the Carthaginians, the fact that one of the most revered figures from the Ancient Greek philosophical tradition was a man – Diogenes – who masturbated in public and slept in a barrel, that the Spartans used to leave infants to die in the wild of exposure if they weren’t deemed “fit” as future soldiers, that Plato was a proponent of – in his “The Republic” – a totalitarian dystopia as the ideal society, that pederasty was considered a good thing by many of their “greatest” thinkers, and that they – Romans – then deteriorated into a state where the main public pastime was watching slaves murder each other and be eaten alive by animals, it makes me wonder how this could possibly be considered a success.”—-Abu Ayoub Someone on my management team defended me once by saying —-“Curt fails like the rest of us, the difference is we do a few things and some fail, he does ten thousand things, and some fail.”— I do not confuse perfect with THE BEST. Meanwhile most civilizations cannot produce anything resembling a western commons or polity, because they cannot cull or rule the underclasses, cannot produce a competitive aristocracy, cannot produce truth, trust, commons, defense of commons, and break the limits of family, clan, and tribe to produce goods. Only japanese and Koreans. They applied truth, they created naturalism and reason culminating in roman law, and by archimedes were on the verge of the industrial revolution in just a few hundred years – and we dragged mankind out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, early death, and vicisitudes of nature. Why? They preserve competition in all walks of life, and deem it heroic. All the great civilizations of the ancient world are lost but east asia. Europe was rebuilt itself from the north. Harappan didn’t make it, but did it’s best from the east. And Judaism, christianity, and islam are a cancer that destroys all before it by reversing eugenic progress. The secret to success for a people is shrinking the lower classes until the middle classes are productive enough to carry what remains, without constant decline. the problem is it is preferable for rulers to keep people poor can concentrate wealth – everywhere except for far east and far west. China had Reason-lite and order before face but face before truth, the west had Reason, and truth before all and markets. With christianity as the cancer that we are still (some of us) struggling to escape. Africa, the pacific, and america had too little time. The middle east over extended and islam destroyed all the great civilizations as a cancer of uncontrolled underclass growth. ANd we simply see this in the data. That said, your criticisms are legit. they are just immaterial in relation to the successes. If you were ruled, were you better off under any rule than you are under western? There is no comparison of rule between civilizations even between chinese rule and western rule. The the greatest mistake my people made was expanding aristocratic egalitarianism (aristocracy of everyone) beyond the possible. The second greatest mistake my people made was the white man’s burden. It is true. But we should never have tried to carry that burden. The third greatest mistake my people made was trying to preserve the ‘market’ of the balance of powers, rather than letting the russians retake constantinople, and the germans eastern europe. The fourth greatest mistake my people made was the sequence of falure to return the slaves to africa, liberating our ancient enemy the jews, not prosecuting the communists with an inquisition, and the postwar immigration act – these are christian errors. All of these are the same mistake – optimism about mankind – and virtue signaling.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551032329 Timestamp) I wish I could capture into words the world view when this song was written compared to the world view today. —” There is no pain you are receding A distant ship’s smoke on the horizon You are only coming through in waves Your lips move but I can’t hear what you’re saying “– We lived in a civilizational luxury, at the cost of continuous civilizational warfare. We were dragging mankind out of the dark. But in doing it paid too high a price. The collapse of communism was good for mankind. The collapse of the russian empire, rather than its conversion into a conservative version of european civilization on the eastern european model is the great catastrophe of the second half of the twentieth century. If you had told me that a decade ago I would have disagreed.