Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

(FB 1546008938 Timestamp) DOOLITTLE VS HUNTINGTON – MINOR DIFFERENCE WITH MAJOR CONSEQUENCES —“The underlying problem for the West is not Islamic Fundamentalism. It is Islam, a different civilisation whose people are convinced of the superiority of their culture and are obsessed with the inferiority ol°their power. The problem for Islam is not CIA orthc US. Department of defense. It is the West, a different civilisation whose people are convinced of the universality of their culture and believe that their superior, if declining, power imposes on them the obligation to impose that culture throughout the world. These are the basic ingredients that fuel conflict between Islam and the West.”— Huntington. DOOLITTLE’S EXPANSION OF HUNTINGTON: My position is that it is not just the west against islam (since islam is the only civilization hostile to modernity remaining), but that it is Western Aryanism: Truth, Sovereignty, Agency, and Eugenics and the Male Pack Strategy of Nation States, against Semitic Abrahamism: Deceit, Submission, and Dysgenics, and the female herd strategy of empires of ignorance. In other words, it is against the Abrahamic Method, and it’s instantiations in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and Marxism (jewish), postmodernism (christian), Feminism (secular), and Islamism (islamic), forms The evidence is what it is. Nothing can change it. HUNTINGTON VS DOOLITTLE It’s not just culture and belief, but the survival and transcendence of mankind rather than it’s continuous devolution and destruction that occurs wherever islam, judaism spread. Huntington was arguing in the cold war model of political and military strategy. I’m arguing against extinction of mankind, by the extinction of truth, reason, science, and sovereignty. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are technologies not of rebellion but of undermining, conquest, consumption, and destruction through devolution and consumption. Islame consumed each civilization. It is cancer.