(FB 1545754612 Timestamp) A VIKING CHRISTMAS STORY (edited) Twas the night before Christmas, and all through the village The men sharpened knives and the boys dreamt of pillage. The skulls were all hung by the chimney with care In hopes on the morrow, more would be there. The girls were nestled all snug in their beds, While visions of jewelry, danced in their heads. And mamma in her gown, and I in my shirt, Had just caught our breath from a quick winterâs flirt. When out on the river there arose such a clatter, I sprang from the bed, to see what was the matter. Away to the Hall, I flew in a rush, Tore open the shutters, and threw up the sash. The moon on the breast of the new-fallen snow Gave the lustre of mid-day to objects below. When, what to my wondering eyes should appear, But a longboat with shields, and great men with their gear. With a bearded old man, lively and wisened, I knew in a moment it must be Lord Odin. More rapid than eagles his warriors they came, And he whistled, and shouted, and called them by name! “Now, Dasher! now, Dancer! now, Prancer and Vixen! On, Comet! On, Cupid! on, Donner and Blitzen! To the top of the porch! to the top of the wall! Now dash away! Dash away! Dash away all!” As dry leaves that before the wild hurricane fly, When they meet with an obstacle, mount to the sky. So up to the house-top the coursers they flew, With bags full of booty, and Lord Odin too. And then, in a twinkling, I heard at the door The laughter of brethren hardened by war. As I drew in my head, and was turning around, Lord Odin, through the portal, came with a bound. He was dressed all in grey, from his head to his foot, And his clothes were all fouled with snow and with soot. A bundle of booty he had flung on his back, And he looked like a merchant, just opening his pack. His eyes-how they twinkled! his laughter how merry! His cheeks were like roses, his nose like a cherry! The beard of his chin was as white as the snow, And his purses, hung neatly, from his belt, in a row. The stump of a pipe, he held tight, in his teeth, And the smoke it, encircled his head, like a wreath. He had a long face, pointed hat, and grey cloak, That shook when he laughed, like the bough of an oak. He was tall and thin, but a jolly old elf, And I laughed when I saw him, in spite of myself! But a wink of his eye, and a twist of his head, Soon gave me to know, I had nothing to dread. He spoke not a word, but went straight to his work, And filled all the stockings, then turned with a jerk. And laying his finger, aside of his cheek, And giving a nod, tossed my share to my feet. He sprang to his boots, and to men gave a whistle, And away we all flew like the down of a thistle. And I heard him exclaim, âere we ran into the night, “Happy Viking to all, and to all a good-fight!” -Curt Doolittle (With Apologies to Dickens)
Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546008938 Timestamp) DOOLITTLE VS HUNTINGTON – MINOR DIFFERENCE WITH MAJOR CONSEQUENCES —âThe underlying problem for the West is not Islamic Fundamentalism. It is Islam, a different civilisation whose people are convinced of the superiority of their culture and are obsessed with the inferiority ol°their power. The problem for Islam is not CIA orthc US. Department of defense. It is the West, a different civilisation whose people are convinced of the universality of their culture and believe that their superior, if declining, power imposes on them the obligation to impose that culture throughout the world. These are the basic ingredients that fuel conï¬ict between Islam and the West.”— Huntington. DOOLITTLE’S EXPANSION OF HUNTINGTON: My position is that it is not just the west against islam (since islam is the only civilization hostile to modernity remaining), but that it is Western Aryanism: Truth, Sovereignty, Agency, and Eugenics and the Male Pack Strategy of Nation States, against Semitic Abrahamism: Deceit, Submission, and Dysgenics, and the female herd strategy of empires of ignorance. In other words, it is against the Abrahamic Method, and it’s instantiations in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and Marxism (jewish), postmodernism (christian), Feminism (secular), and Islamism (islamic), forms The evidence is what it is. Nothing can change it. HUNTINGTON VS DOOLITTLE It’s not just culture and belief, but the survival and transcendence of mankind rather than it’s continuous devolution and destruction that occurs wherever islam, judaism spread. Huntington was arguing in the cold war model of political and military strategy. I’m arguing against extinction of mankind, by the extinction of truth, reason, science, and sovereignty. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are technologies not of rebellion but of undermining, conquest, consumption, and destruction through devolution and consumption. Islame consumed each civilization. It is cancer.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1546007061 Timestamp) EMMANUEL TODD IN DEPTH: MARRIAGE DIFFERENCES MATTER – PERHAPS MOST OF ALL. https://www.samizdata.net/2013/11/first-thoughts-on-america-3-0-the-emmanuel-todd-connection/
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1546006955 Timestamp) EMMANUEL TODD AND FAMILY STRUCTURES https://morganwlfc.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/an-introduction-to-emmanuel-todd-in-english-part-one/
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1546006702 Timestamp) THE HAJNAL LINE —“What is it called? Hansa line? Hanja line? I can’t find anything when searching for it”— Hajnal Line: Line where bipartite manorialism spread in northern europe, producing delayed marriage and higher investment parenting, and seems to have been the cause of low clannishness, the work ethic, and high trust. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hajnal_line Just as Kevin Macdonald worked on the Jewish Question, Jayman/Steve Hsu and others on the genetic question, to a large degree HBD_Chick (who stays anonymous just as did Jayman) works on clannishness and she popularized (among the HBD movement) the work of both Emmanuel Todd (French historian), and John Hajnal (Hungarian-British Mathematician) in their work on the differences between populations in europe – particularly given their family structures. This work dovetails with Hannan’s “Albion’s Seed” argument about the retention of local british culture as waves of british immigrants spread across the states. -Curt Doolittle
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1546016910 Timestamp) INCOMPATIBILITY https://archive.org/details/TheClashOfCivilizations-anIslamicView.pdf
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1546009856 Timestamp) THE DIVERGENCE OF ADVANCED NATIONS (TODD: –“I am a demographer”–, Which I hope illustrates my constant point that ‘demographics is everything’. ) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yz4zUGlhK8
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546008938 Timestamp) DOOLITTLE VS HUNTINGTON – MINOR DIFFERENCE WITH MAJOR CONSEQUENCES —âThe underlying problem for the West is not Islamic Fundamentalism. It is Islam, a different civilisation whose people are convinced of the superiority of their culture and are obsessed with the inferiority ol°their power. The problem for Islam is not CIA orthc US. Department of defense. It is the West, a different civilisation whose people are convinced of the universality of their culture and believe that their superior, if declining, power imposes on them the obligation to impose that culture throughout the world. These are the basic ingredients that fuel conï¬ict between Islam and the West.”— Huntington. DOOLITTLE’S EXPANSION OF HUNTINGTON: My position is that it is not just the west against islam (since islam is the only civilization hostile to modernity remaining), but that it is Western Aryanism: Truth, Sovereignty, Agency, and Eugenics and the Male Pack Strategy of Nation States, against Semitic Abrahamism: Deceit, Submission, and Dysgenics, and the female herd strategy of empires of ignorance. In other words, it is against the Abrahamic Method, and it’s instantiations in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and Marxism (jewish), postmodernism (christian), Feminism (secular), and Islamism (islamic), forms The evidence is what it is. Nothing can change it. HUNTINGTON VS DOOLITTLE It’s not just culture and belief, but the survival and transcendence of mankind rather than it’s continuous devolution and destruction that occurs wherever islam, judaism spread. Huntington was arguing in the cold war model of political and military strategy. I’m arguing against extinction of mankind, by the extinction of truth, reason, science, and sovereignty. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are technologies not of rebellion but of undermining, conquest, consumption, and destruction through devolution and consumption. Islame consumed each civilization. It is cancer.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1546007061 Timestamp) EMMANUEL TODD IN DEPTH: MARRIAGE DIFFERENCES MATTER – PERHAPS MOST OF ALL. https://www.samizdata.net/2013/11/first-thoughts-on-america-3-0-the-emmanuel-todd-connection/
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1546006955 Timestamp) EMMANUEL TODD AND FAMILY STRUCTURES https://morganwlfc.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/an-introduction-to-emmanuel-todd-in-english-part-one/